IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v22y2013i5d10.1007_s10726-012-9296-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Type-2 TOPSIS: A Group Decision Problem When Ideal Values are not Extreme Endpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Majid Zerafat Angiz Langroudi

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

  • Ali Emrouznejad

    (Aston University)

  • Adli Mustafa

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

  • Joshua Ignatius

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

Abstract

In the traditional TOPSIS, the ideal solutions are assumed to be located at the endpoints of the data interval. However, not all performance attributes possess ideal values at the endpoints. We termed performance attributes that have ideal values at extreme points as Type-1 attributes. Type-2 attributes however possess ideal values somewhere within the data interval instead of being at the extreme end points. This provides a preference ranking problem when all attributes are computed and assumed to be of the Type-1 nature. To overcome this issue, we propose a new Fuzzy DEA method for computing the ideal values and distance function of Type-2 attributes in a TOPSIS methodology. Our method allows Type-1 and Type-2 attributes to be included in an evaluation system without compromising the ranking quality. The efficacy of the proposed model is illustrated with a vendor evaluation case for a high-tech investment decision making exercise. A comparison analysis with the traditional TOPSIS is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Majid Zerafat Angiz Langroudi & Ali Emrouznejad & Adli Mustafa & Joshua Ignatius, 2013. "Type-2 TOPSIS: A Group Decision Problem When Ideal Values are not Extreme Endpoints," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 851-866, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9296-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Chang, Yu-Hern, 2009. "Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 464-473, April.
    2. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. F. Hutton Barron & Bruce E. Barrett, 1996. "Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(11), pages 1515-1523, November.
    5. Li, Xiao-Bai & Reeves, Gary R., 1999. "A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 507-517, June.
    6. Marcos Lins & Luiz Novaes & Luiz Legey, 2005. "Real Estate Appraisal: A Double Perspective Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 79-96, September.
    7. Paul J. H. Schoemaker & C. Carter Waid, 1982. "An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 182-196, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Antunes & Rangan Gupta & Zinnia Mukherjee & Peter Wanke, 2022. "Information entropy, continuous improvement, and US energy performance: a novel stochastic-entropic analysis for ideal solutions (SEA-IS)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 289-318, June.
    2. Hsu-Shih Shih, 2016. "A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 537-565, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghasemi, M.-R. & Ignatius, Joshua & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2014. "A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 640-650.
    2. Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Ignatius, Joshua & Rezaee, Babak, 2019. "Improving discriminating power in data envelopment models based on deviation variables framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 442-447.
    3. Fang, Tao & Fang, Debin & Yu, Bolin, 2022. "Carbon emission efficiency of thermal power generation in China: Empirical evidence from the micro-perspective of power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.
    5. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Baris Yilmaz & Mehmet Yurdusev & Nilgun Harmancioglu, 2009. "The Assessment of Irrigation Efficiency in Buyuk Menderes Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(6), pages 1081-1095, April.
    7. Risto Lahdelma & Pekka Salminen, 2001. "SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 444-454, June.
    8. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    9. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Madjid Tavana & Kobra Gholami & Zahra Ghelej Beigi, 2015. "A Bounded Data Envelopment Analysis Model in a Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Safety in the Semiconductor Industry," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 679-701, February.
    10. Jesús Peiró-Palomino & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2018. "Assessing well-being in European regions. Does government quality matter?," Working Papers 2018/06, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    11. Maciej Jewczak & Agata Zoltaczek, 2011. "Technical efficiency evaluation of health care entities in 1999-2009 - spatial and dynamic analysis - a case study of general care hospitals, with the use of DEA method (Ocena efektywnosci technicznej," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(33), pages 194-210.
    12. Wolff, François-Charles, 2014. "Lift ticket prices and quality in French ski resorts: Insights from a non-parametric analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1155-1164.
    13. François-Charles Wolff, 2014. "Lift ticket prices and quality in French ski resorts: Insights from a non-parametric analysis," Working Papers hal-00952999, HAL.
    14. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Pereira, Deivison da Silveira & Soares de Mello, João Carlos C.B., 2021. "Efficiency evaluation of Brazilian airlines operations considering the Covid-19 outbreak," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.
    17. Stéphane Blancard & Maximin Bonnet & Jean-François Hoarau, 2020. "The specific role of agriculture for economic vulnerability of small island spaces," Working Papers hal-02441237, HAL.
    18. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Per J. Agrell & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami & Pegah Khoshnevis, 2017. "The role of multiplier bounds in fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 249-276, March.
    19. Sahar Ahmadvand & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2018. "An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 587-603, December.
    20. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Saber Saati & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi, 2018. "Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 909-932, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9296-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.