IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v21y2012i2d10.1007_s10726-011-9269-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of Group Decision Method for Environmental Foresight and Water Resources Planning Using a Fuzzy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ana X. Halabi

    (Universidad de La Sabana
    Macquarie University)

  • Jairo R. Montoya-Torres

    (Universidad de La Sabana)

  • Nelson Obregón

    (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana)

Abstract

Group decision-making (i.e., multi-expert) is an important subject in planning water resources. The inherent complexity and uncertainty of real world urge many experts to be involved in decision-making processes. This paper presents an application of the linguistic-label aggregation method in a real-life case study. The case was taken from a foresight exercise in Colombia (South America) concerning environmental and water resources planning in a river basin. The group decision-making problem is solved using a four-step approach based on (i) the evaluation of experts’ opinions, (ii) the aggregation of opinions for each alternative, (iii) fuzzy ranking, and (iv) final assessment. Two main issues that are new in our work is that we consider temporal linguistic labels and a fuzzy ranking procedure that is able to include the mean, the standard deviation, the fuzzy membership function and the frequency of experts’ opinions for each alternative. The approach is developed and implemented on a computational tool. Results show an efficient decision-making process, that is, the tool demonstrated to deal with shortest time frames and to increase the efficiency of the planning resources, mainly because allows the decision manager to focus on the establishment of criteria. The latter also leads to objectivity and eases the identification and discussion of elements of consensus in decisions that otherwise may be embedded in individuals’ interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana X. Halabi & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Nelson Obregón, 2012. "A Case Study of Group Decision Method for Environmental Foresight and Water Resources Planning Using a Fuzzy Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 205-232, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:21:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-011-9269-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-011-9269-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-011-9269-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-011-9269-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeshui Xu, 2006. "A Practical Procedure for Group Decision Making under Incomplete Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 581-591, November.
    2. Christof Weinhardt & Stefan Seifert, 2010. "Developments in GDN Research: Introduction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 107-109, March.
    3. Herrera, F. & Martinez, L. & Sanchez, P. J., 2005. "Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 115-132, October.
    4. Wang, Reay-Chen & Chuu, Shian-Jong, 2004. "Group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 563-572, May.
    5. Xu, Zeshui, 2005. "Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 249-254, June.
    6. Liu, Chih-Ming & Wang, Mao-Jiun & Pang, Yock-Seng, 1994. "A multiple criteria linguistic decision model (MCLDM) for human decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 466-485, August.
    7. Guangquan Zhang & Jie Lu, 2003. "An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 501-515, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    2. Danielle Costa Morais & Adiel Teixeira Almeida & José Rui Figueira, 2014. "A Sorting Model for Group Decision Making: A Case Study of Water Losses in Brazil," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 937-960, September.
    3. Ali Azarnivand & Arash Malekian, 2016. "Analysis of Flood Risk Management Strategies Based on a Group Decision Making Process via Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 1903-1921, April.
    4. Ali Azarnivand & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, 2017. "A Multi-level Strategic Group Decision Making for Understanding and Analysis of Sustainable Watershed Planning in Response to Environmental Perplexities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 629-648, May.
    5. Adiel T. de Almeida-Filho & Madson B. S. Monte & Danielle C. Morais, 2017. "A Voting Approach Applied to Preventive Maintenance Management of a Water Supply System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 523-546, May.
    6. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Apreda, Riccardo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2020. "Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeshui Xu, 2006. "A Practical Procedure for Group Decision Making under Incomplete Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 581-591, November.
    2. Pang, Jifang & Liang, Jiye, 2012. "Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 294-301.
    3. Lan, Jibin & Chen, Yuwen & Ning, Mengyao & Wang, Zhongxing, 2015. "A new linguistic aggregation operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 156-164.
    4. Sun, Bingzhen & Ma, Weimin, 2015. "An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-92.
    5. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi & Feng, Bo, 2010. "The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 455-463, June.
    6. Liu, Fang & Zhang, Wei-Guo & Wang, Zhong-Xing, 2012. "A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 747-754.
    7. Chuu, Shian-Jong, 2011. "Interactive group decision-making using a fuzzy linguistic approach for evaluating the flexibility in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 279-289, August.
    8. Jia-Wei Tang & Tsuen-Ho Hsu, 2018. "Utilizing the Hierarchy Structural Fuzzy Analytical Network Process Model to Evaluate Critical Elements of Marketing Strategic Alliance Development in Mobile Telecommunication Industry," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-284, April.
    9. Chiu-Chi Wei & Chih-Chien Tai & Shun-Chin Lee & Meng-Ling Chang, 2023. "Assessing Knowledge Quality Using Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Ni Li & Minghui Sun & Zhuming Bi & Zeya Su & Chao Wang, 2014. "A new methodology to support group decision-making for IoT-based emergency response systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 953-977, November.
    11. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K & Zhao, Longfeng & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chien, Chen-Fu & Lev, Benjamin, 2020. "The evolution of Omega-The International Journal of Management Science over the past 40 years: A bibliometric overview," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Serrano García, Jakeline & Acevedo Álvarez, Carlos Alberto & Castelblanco Gómez, Johnatan Mauricio & Arbeláez Toro, Juan José, 2017. "Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 93-109.
    13. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    14. Hui Lin & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Risk Preferences and Its Use in Low-Carbon Tourism Destination Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Zeshui Xu, 2013. "Compatibility Analysis of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 463-482, May.
    16. Jiahui Chai & Sidong Xian & Sichong Lu, 2021. "Z probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in multi-attribute group decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 529-566, December.
    17. Zhou, Shenghan & Liu, Wei & Chang, Wenbing, 2016. "An improved TOPSIS with weighted hesitant vague information," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 47-53.
    18. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu & Huchang Liao, 2019. "Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Possibility Degree-Based Linear Assignment Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 35-63, January.
    19. Shuangsheng Wu & Jie Lin & Zhenyu Zhang & Yushu Yang, 2021. "Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm and Its Application in Judicial Practice," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Ahmet Aytekin & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2017. "Analyzing Financial Performance Of Insurance Companies Traded In BIST via Fuzzy Shannon's Entropy Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 5(1), pages 51-84, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:21:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-011-9269-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.