IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fuzodm/v22y2023i1d10.1007_s10700-022-09382-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ELECTRE II method based on the cosine similarity to evaluate the performance of financial logistics enterprises under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ruichen Zhang

    (Sichuan University)

  • Zeshui Xu

    (Sichuan University)

  • Xunjie Gou

    (Sichuan University)

Abstract

It is very common to use linguistic information to solve decision-making problems in real life, and the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (DHHFLTS) has been widely used because of its powerful ability of expressing complex linguistic information. There is no doubt that the comparison method of double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic elements (DHHFLEs) not only occupies an important theoretical and practical position, but also is the basis for further study of DHHFLTSs. However, the existing comparison methods of DHHFLEs still have some limitations. Therefore, this paper proposes a new DHHFLE comparison method, which is an improvement and perfection of the existing DHHFLE comparison methods. In addition, considering that the current research on distance and similarity measures of DHHFLEs is mostly based on the algebraic point of view, this paper proposes a cosine similarity measure of DHHFLEs, which fills the gap in the study of distance and similarity measures from the geometric point of view. Then, the cosine similarity-based DHHFL-ELECTRE II method is proposed to solve the multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem in the double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Finally, this method is used to solve a MADM problem in the performance evaluation of financial logistics enterprises. The results show that the proposed method has certain applicability and feasibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruichen Zhang & Zeshui Xu & Xunjie Gou, 2023. "ELECTRE II method based on the cosine similarity to evaluate the performance of financial logistics enterprises under double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 23-49, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:22:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-022-09382-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10700-022-09382-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10700-022-09382-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10700-022-09382-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu & Huchang Liao & Francisco Herrera, 2021. "Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term set and its use in designing an improved VIKOR method: The application in smart healthcare," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(12), pages 2611-2630, December.
    2. Liao, Huchang & Wu, Xingli & Mi, Xiaomei & Herrera, Francisco, 2020. "An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Yongming & Li, Yanhong & Zhu, Hongli & Li, Guangxu, 2023. "A decision support model for buying battery electric vehicles considering consumer learning and psychological behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua Shi & Lin Huang & Ke Li & Xiang-Hu Wang & Hu-Chen Liu, 2022. "An Extended Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Method for Emergency Decision Making with Complex Linguistic Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Zhao, Meng & Xu, Chang & Zhao, Wenxian & Lin, Mingwei, 2023. "New energy vehicle online selection method considering attribute compensation relationship and aspiration strength," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Zhiying Zhang & Huchang Liao, 2024. "A stochastic cross-efficiency DEA approach based on the prospect theory and its application in winner determination in public procurement tenders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 509-537, October.
    4. Wei Huang & Peiqi Hu & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Yinke Liu & Yu Huang, 2022. "Smart Sales Empower Small Farmers: An Integrated Matching Method between Suppliers and Consumers Based on the Information Axiom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shanlin Yang, 2022. "A comparative analysis of probabilistic linguistic preference relations and distributed preference relations for decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 71-97, March.
    6. Liu, Xianliang & Ma, Yonghao, 2021. "A method to analyze the rank reversal problem in the ELECTRE II method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Jinshan Ma & Zhiqi Yuan & Guanghua Zheng & Fushan Lang, 2022. "Combination Generalized Grey Target Decision Method for Mixed Attributes Based on Zero-Sum Game Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1121-1143, December.
    8. Zhongqiong Qu & Yongxin Wei & Xun Li, 2021. "Risk Perception of Rural Land Supply Reform in China: From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Guohua Qu & Zhijie Zhang & Weihua Qu & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Sidong Xian & Ke Qing & Ling Tang & Huilan Pan, 2023. "A Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Based on Possibility Degree Matrix and $$\mathbb {ZPDHL}$$ ZPDHL -VIKOR Method," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 633-666, June.
    11. Song, Yongming & Li, Yanhong & Zhu, Hongli & Li, Guangxu, 2023. "A decision support model for buying battery electric vehicles considering consumer learning and psychological behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Meng, Fanyong & Tang, Jie & An, Qingxian, 2023. "Cooperative game based two-stage consensus adjustment mechanism for large-scale group decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Chao Fu & Min Xue & Wenjun Chang, 2022. "Multiple criteria decision making with reliability of assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 121-157, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:22:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-022-09382-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.