IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fuzodm/v19y2020i4d10.1007_s10700-020-09329-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A group decision making with probability linguistic preference relations based on nonlinear optimization model and fuzzy cooperative games

Author

Listed:
  • Pei Liang

    (Central South University)

  • Junhua Hu

    (Central South University)

  • Bo Li

    (Central South University)

  • Yongmei Liu

    (Central South University)

  • Xiaohong Chen

    (Central South University)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to solve the group decision making problems which contain inconsistent probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) and unknown expert weights. When the PLPRs are inconsistent, there are contradictories in the preference relations expressed by the experts. The evaluation value with contradictory information will bring out an incorrect consequence in decision making. Hence, this paper develops a novel consistency measure method to gauge the consistency level of PLPRs. Moreover, a nonlinear optimization model is newly constructed to optimize the inconsistent PLPRs. The proposed methods overcome the limitations in the existing methods and ameliorate the interpretation and complexities of inconsistency PLPRs revise strategies. Additionally, a weighting method using fuzzy cooperative games with PLPRs is put forward to derive the weight vector of experts. It helps to balance the deviations between the individual PLPRs and the group PLRP. At last, a numerical example illustration for physician selection is put forward to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and its practical applicability. The comparative analysis gives deep insights into the rationality of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei Liang & Junhua Hu & Bo Li & Yongmei Liu & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "A group decision making with probability linguistic preference relations based on nonlinear optimization model and fuzzy cooperative games," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 499-528, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:19:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10700-020-09329-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10700-020-09329-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10700-020-09329-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10700-020-09329-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi, 2008. "On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 430-444, September.
    2. Sui-zhi Luo & Hong-yu Zhang & Jian-qiang Wang & Lin Li, 2019. "Group decision-making approach for evaluating the sustainability of constructed wetlands with probabilistic linguistic preference relations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(12), pages 2039-2055, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu-Rong Yan & Khalid A. Alattas & Mohsen Bakouri & Abdullah K. Alanazi & Ardashir Mohammadzadeh & Saleh Mobayen & Anton Zhilenkov & Wei Guo, 2022. "Generalized Type-2 Fuzzy Control for Type-I Diabetes: Analytical Robust System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shanlin Yang, 2022. "A comparative analysis of probabilistic linguistic preference relations and distributed preference relations for decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 71-97, March.
    3. Zijun Li & Fanyong Meng, 2023. "The potential and consistency of the Owen value for fuzzy cooperative games with a coalition structure," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 387-414, September.
    4. Huimin Xiao & Shouwen Wu & Chunsheng Cui, 2022. "The Research on Consistency Checking and Improvement of Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relation Based on Similarity Measure and Minimum Adjustment Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huimin Xiao & Shouwen Wu & Chunsheng Cui, 2022. "The Research on Consistency Checking and Improvement of Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relation Based on Similarity Measure and Minimum Adjustment Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Feifei Jin & Chang Li & Jinpei Liu & Ligang Zhou, 2021. "Distribution Linguistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Based on Consistency and Consensus Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    4. González-Arteaga, T. & Alcantud, J.C.R. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2016. "A cardinal dissensus measure based on the Mahalanobis distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 575-585.
    5. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2011. "An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 179-189, July.
    6. Meimei Xia & Jian Chen & Juliang Zhang, 2015. "Multi-criteria decision making based on relative measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 791-811, June.
    7. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shanlin, 2012. "An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 167-176.
    8. Wu, Zhibin & Huang, Shuai & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Multi-stage optimization models for individual consistency and group consensus with preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 182-194.
    9. Mamata Sahu & Anjana Gupta, 2019. "Improving the consistency of incomplete hesitant multiplicative preference relation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 324-343, March.
    10. Fu, Chao & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2010. "The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 601-608, November.
    11. Jia Huang & Hu-Chen Liu & Chun-Yan Duan & Ming-Shun Song, 2022. "An improved reliability model for FMEA using probabilistic linguistic term sets and TODIM method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 235-258, May.
    12. Ergu, Daji & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi & Shi, Yong, 2011. "A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 246-259, August.
    13. Zaiwu Gong & Lihong Wang, 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera & Francisco Javier Cabrerizo & Sergio Alonso & Ignacio Javier Pérez & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Assisting Users in Decisions Using Fuzzy Ontologies: Application in the Wine Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Yucheng Dong & Cong-Cong Li & Yinfeng Xu & Xin Gu, 2015. "Consensus-Based Group Decision Making Under Multi-granular Unbalanced 2-Tuple Linguistic Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 217-242, March.
    16. Gong, Zaiwu & Zhang, Huanhuan & Forrest, Jeffrey & Li, Lianshui & Xu, Xiaoxia, 2015. "Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 183-192.
    17. Zhiping Hou & Sangsang He & Ruxia Liang & Junbo Li & Ruilu Huang & Jianqiang Wang, 2023. "Evaluating Economy Hotel Website Service Quality: A Hybrid Bounded Rationality Behavioral Decision Support Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Zhen Zhang & Chonghui Guo, 2017. "Deriving priority weights from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations under group decision-making settings," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(12), pages 1582-1599, December.
    19. Yongming Song, 2018. "Deriving the priority weights from probabilistic linguistic preference relation with unknown probabilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Sun, Bingzhen & Ma, Weimin, 2015. "An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:19:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10700-020-09329-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.