IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fuzodm/v16y2017i3d10.1007_s10700-016-9252-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relations among efficient solutions in uncertain multiobjective programming

Author

Listed:
  • Mingfa Zheng

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Yuan Yi

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

  • Zutong Wang

    (Air Force Engineering University)

  • Tianjun Liao

    (Beijing Institute of System Engineering)

Abstract

Based on uncertainty theory, this work deals with the relations among concepts of efficient solutions for uncertain multiobjective programming (UMOP) problems. Firstly, the UMOP model with uncertain vectors in objective functions is presented. Secondly, seven types of concepts of efficient solutions for the UMOP model, such as expected-value standard-deviation efficiency, expected-value properly efficiency, efficiency with belief degrees etc., are defined. Finally, the relations of these different efficiency concepts, especially the expected-value standard-deviation efficiency and efficiency with belief degrees, are established under certain conditions, and two numerical examples are given to illustrate these theoretical results. Our work helps to determine what types of efficient solutions are obtained by each of these concepts and also provides theoretical foundation for multiple attribute decision-making in uncertain systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingfa Zheng & Yuan Yi & Zutong Wang & Tianjun Liao, 2017. "Relations among efficient solutions in uncertain multiobjective programming," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 329-357, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9252-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10700-016-9252-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10700-016-9252-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10700-016-9252-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2004. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 427-429, April.
    2. Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad & Masri, Hatem, 2010. "A compromise solution for the multiobjective stochastic linear programming under partial uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 55-59, April.
    3. ,, 2004. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 223-229, February.
    4. Alarcon-Rodriguez, Arturo & Ault, Graham & Galloway, Stuart, 2010. "Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1353-1366, June.
    5. Muñoz, María M. & Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben, 2012. "Satisfactory solution concepts and their relations for Stochastic Multiobjective Programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 430-442.
    6. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Wang, Zutong & Guo, Jiansheng & Zheng, Mingfa & Wang, Ying, 2015. "Uncertain multiobjective traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 478-489.
    8. Caballero, Rafael & Cerda, Emilio & del Mar Munoz, Maria & Rey, Lourdes, 2004. "Stochastic approach versus multiobjective approach for obtaining efficient solutions in stochastic multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(3), pages 633-648, November.
    9. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben, 2012. "Solution approaches for the multiobjective stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Cinzia Colapinto & Davide La Torre & Danilo Liuzzi, 2020. "A stochastic dynamic multiobjective model for sustainable decision making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 539-556, October.
    2. Engau, Alexander & Sigler, Devon, 2020. "Pareto solutions in multicriteria optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 357-368.
    3. Javier León & Justo Puerto & Begoña Vitoriano, 2020. "A Risk-Aversion Approach for the Multiobjective Stochastic Programming Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Walter Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    5. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    6. Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra & Coit, David W. & Felder, Frank A., 2020. "Pareto uncertainty index for evaluating and comparing solutions for stochastic multiple objective problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 644-659.
    7. Sophie N. Parragh & Fabien Tricoire & Walter J. Gutjahr, 2022. "A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for a bi-objective stochastic facility location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(2), pages 419-459, June.
    8. Mercier, Quentin & Poirion, Fabrice & Désidéri, Jean-Antoine, 2018. "A stochastic multiple gradient descent algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 808-817.
    9. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben, 2012. "Solution approaches for the multiobjective stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 1-16.
    10. Chaabane Djamal & Mebrek Fatma, 2014. "Optimization of a linear function over the set of stochastic efficient solutions," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 157-178, January.
    11. Jörg Fliege & Huifu Xu, 2011. "Stochastic Multiobjective Optimization: Sample Average Approximation and Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 135-162, October.
    12. S. Rangavajhala & A. A. Mullur & A. Messac, 2009. "Equality Constraints in Multiobjective Robust Design Optimization: Decision Making Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 315-337, February.
    13. Mahdi Zarghami, 2010. "Urban Water Management Using Fuzzy-Probabilistic Multi-Objective Programming with Dynamic Efficiency," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(15), pages 4491-4504, December.
    14. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew & Dowd, Kevin, 2008. "Turning pension plans into pension planes: What investment strategy designers of defined contribution pension plans can learn from commercial aircraft designers," MPRA Paper 33749, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Lunn, Pete & McGowan, Féidhlim & Howard, Noel, 2018. "Do some financial product features negatively affect consumer decisions? a review of evidence," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS78.
    16. T Peña & P Lara & C Castrodeza, 2009. "Multiobjective stochastic programming for feed formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1738-1748, December.
    17. Belaid AOUNI & Cinzia COLAPINTO & Davide LA TORRE, 2008. "Solving stochastic multi-objective programming through the GP model," Departmental Working Papers 2008-18, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    18. Fatima Bellahcene, 2019. "Decision maker's preferences modeling for multiple objective stochastic linear programming problems," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(3), pages 5-16.
    19. Zarghami, Mahdi & Szidarovszky, Ferenc, 2009. "Revising the OWA operator for multi criteria decision making problems under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 259-265, October.
    20. Emilio Cerdá & Julio Moreno Lorente, 2009. "Chance Constrained Programming with one Discrete Random Variable in Each Constraint," Working Papers 2009-05, FEDEA.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9252-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.