IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v94y2021i8d10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00173-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Charting closed-loop collective cultural decisions: from book best sellers and music downloads to Twitter hashtags and Reddit comments

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Schneider

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

  • Johannes Scholten

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

  • Bulcsú Sándor

    (Babes-Bolyai University)

  • Claudius Gros

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

Abstract

Charts are used to measure relative success for a large variety of cultural items. Traditional music charts have been shown to follow self-organizing principles with regard to the distribution of item lifetimes, the on-chart residence times. Here we examine if this observation holds also for (a) music streaming charts (b) book best-seller lists and (c) for social network activity charts, such as Twitter hashtags and the number of comments Reddit postings receive. We find that charts based on the active production of items, like commenting, are more likely to be influenced by external factors, in particular by the 24 h day–night cycle. External factors are less important for consumption-based charts (sales, downloads), which can be explained by a generic theory of decision-making. In this view, humans aim to optimize the information content of the internal representation of the outside world, which is logarithmically compressed. Further support for information maximization is argued to arise from the comparison of hourly, daily and weekly charts, which allow to gauge the importance of decision times with respect to the chart compilation period.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Schneider & Johannes Scholten & Bulcsú Sándor & Claudius Gros, 2021. "Charting closed-loop collective cultural decisions: from book best sellers and music downloads to Twitter hashtags and Reddit comments," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:94:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00173-0
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00173-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00173-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00173-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltán Néda & Levente Varga & Tamás S Biró, 2017. "Science and Facebook: The same popularity law!," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Ordanini, Andrea & Nunes, Joseph C., 2016. "From fewer blockbusters by more superstars to more blockbusters by fewer superstars: How technological innovation has impacted convergence on the music chart," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 297-313.
    3. C. Gros & G. Kaczor & D. Marković, 2012. "Neuropsychological constraints to human data production on a global scale," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 85(1), pages 1-5, January.
    4. Claudius Gros, 2017. "Entrenched time delays versus accelerating opinion dynamics: are advanced democracies inherently unstable?," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 90(11), pages 1-8, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudius Gros, 2021. "Collective strategy condensation: When envy splits societies," Papers 2101.10824, arXiv.org.
    2. Ilda Inácio & José Velhinho, 2022. "Comments on Mathematical Aspects of the Biró–Néda Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Claudius Gros, 2022. "Collective strategy condensation towards class-separated societies," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(6), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Marc Bourreau & François Moreau & Patrik Wikström, 2022. "Does digitization lead to the homogenization of cultural content?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 427-453, January.
    5. Tóth, István & Lázár, Zsolt I. & Varga, Levente & Járai-Szabó, Ferenc & Papp, István & Florian, Răzvan V. & Ercsey-Ravasz, Mária, 2021. "Mitigating ageing bias in article level metrics using citation network analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    6. Biró, T.S. & Néda, Z., 2018. "Unidirectional random growth with resetting," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 335-361.
    7. Daniel Kaimann & Ilka Tanneberg & Joe Cox, 2021. "“I will survive”: Online streaming and the chart survival of music tracks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 3-20, January.
    8. Lin Hu & Anqi Li & Xu Tan, 2021. "A Rational Inattention Theory of Echo Chamber," Papers 2104.10657, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    9. Matherly, Ted & Arens, Zachary G. & Arnold, Todd J., 2018. "Big brands, big cities: How the population penalty affects common, identity relevant brands in densely populated areas," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 15-33.
    10. Vieira, Elizabeth S. & Lepori, Benedetto, 2016. "The growth process of higher education institutions and public policies," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 286-298.
    11. Biró, Tamás S. & Telcs, András & Józsa, Máté & Néda, Zoltán, 2023. "Gintropic scaling of scientometric indexes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    12. Claudius Gros, 2022. "Collective strategy condensation towards class-separated societies," Papers 2206.03421, arXiv.org.
    13. Jifeng Mu & Ellen Thomas & Jiayin Qi & Yong Tan, 2018. "Online group influence and digital product consumption," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 921-947, September.
    14. Steininger, Dennis M. & Gatzemeier, Simon, 2019. "Digitally forecasting new music product success via active crowdsourcing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 167-180.
    15. Cédric Ceulemans & Victor Ginsburgh & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez & Sheila Weyers, 2018. "One Hundred Years of Solitude Bestsellers in the United States, 1900-1999," Working Papers ECARES 2018-26, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Siudem, Grzegorz & Nowak, Przemysław & Gagolewski, Marek, 2022. "Power laws, the Price model, and the Pareto type-2 distribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    17. Mrowinski, Maciej J. & Gagolewski, Marek & Siudem, Grzegorz, 2022. "Accidentality in journal citation patterns," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    18. Andreas Hefti & Julia Lareida, 2021. "Competitive attention, Superstars and the Long Tail," ECON - Working Papers 383, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    19. Cena, Anna & Gagolewski, Marek & Siudem, Grzegorz & Żogała-Siudem, Barbara, 2022. "Validating citation models by proxy indices," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:94:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1140_epjb_s10051-021-00173-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.