IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v19y2022i2d10.1007_s10433-022-00697-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice models in Nordic long-term care: care managers' experiences of privilege and disadvantage among older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Erlandsson

    (Stockholm University)

  • Helene Brodin

    (Stockholm University)

  • Lea Graff

    (The Danish Centre for Social Science Research)

  • Olli Karsio

    (University of Jyväskylä)

Abstract

Consumer choice models have been introduced in eldercare services in several Western welfare societies. Choice models in eldercare emphasise the importance of individuals’ abilities to make informed choices and therefore entail a risk for increased inequalities among older adults with care needs. In the Nordic countries, such inequality risks are in stark contrast to universal policy ambitions of equal access to care services. Care managers, who are responsible for needs assessment for eldercare services, have a central role in implementing policies and, thus, have first-hand experience of their impact on older adults’ access to care. The aim of this study was to explore care managers’ experiences of how user choice affects older adults’ access to care services in three Nordic cities: Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm. These cities were purposely selected as forerunners in marketisation, with different ways of implementing choice models. Semi-structured interviews with care managers were conducted in Copenhagen, Tampere, and Stockholm and analysed thematically. The findings indicate there are difficulties related to older adults’ ability to access information needed to make informed choices, as well as limitations in choice related to available services and personal finances. Further, care managers find that older adults’ abilities to overcome these difficulties are shaped by their health, education, language skills, and assistance from relatives. In order to reduce the risk of choice models increasing the gap between older adults with different resources and capabilities, there is a need to develop accessible information, as well as models for professional guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Erlandsson & Helene Brodin & Lea Graff & Olli Karsio, 2022. "Choice models in Nordic long-term care: care managers' experiences of privilege and disadvantage among older adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 211-220, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10433-022-00697-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-022-00697-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-022-00697-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-022-00697-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meinow, Bettina & Parker, Marti G. & Thorslund, Mats, 2011. "Consumers of eldercare in Sweden: The semblance of choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1285-1289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malin Christina Ericsson & Margaret Gatz & Ingemar Kåreholt & Marti G. Parker & Stefan Fors, 2017. "Validation of abridged mini-mental state examination scales using population-based data from Sweden and USA," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 199-205, June.
    2. Sukkird, Vatcharapong & Shirahada, Kunio, 2015. "Technology challenges to healthcare service innovation in aging Asia: Case of value co-creation in emergency medical support system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-128.
    3. Walter Beckert & Elaine Kelly, 2021. "Divided by choice? For‐profit providers, patient choice and mechanisms of patient sorting in the English National Health Service," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 820-839, April.
    4. Paula Cristina Albuquerque, 2017. "Information intermediaries in the social care market for the older population," Working Papers Department of Economics 2017/17, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    5. Amadeo Fuenmayor & Rafael Granell & María Angeles Tortosa, 2016. "Quasi-markets Targets and the Evaluation of Nursing-home Funding in the Valencian Region," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 216(1), pages 13-38, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:19:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10433-022-00697-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.