IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v17y2016i1p61-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health care costs attributable to overweight calculated in a standardized way for three European countries

Author

Listed:
  • M. Lette
  • W. Bemelmans
  • J. Breda
  • L. Slobbe
  • J. Dias
  • H. Boshuizen

Abstract

This article presents a tool to calculate health care costs attributable to overweight in a comparable and standardized way. The purpose is to describe the methodological principles of the tool and to put it into use by calculating and comparing the costs attributable to overweight for The Netherlands, Germany and Czech Republic. The tool uses a top-down and prevalence-based approach, consisting of five steps. Step one identifies overweight-related diseases and age- and gender-specific relative risks. Included diseases are ischemic heart disease, stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, colorectal cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer and osteoarthritis. Step two consists of collecting data on the age- and gender-specific prevalence of these diseases. Step three uses the population-attributable prevalence to determine the part of the prevalence of these diseases that is attributable to overweight. Step four calculates the health care costs associated with these diseases. Step five calculates the costs of these diseases that are attributable to overweight. Overweight is responsible for 20–26 % of the direct costs of included diseases, with sensitivity analyses varying this percentage between 15–31 %. Percentage of costs attributable to obesity and preobesity is about the same. Diseases with the highest percentage of costs due to overweight are diabetes, endometrial cancer and osteoarthritis. Disease costs attributable to overweight as a percentage of total health care expenditures range from 2 to 4 %. Data are consistent for all three countries, resulting in roughly a quarter of costs of included diseases being attributable to overweight. Copyright The Author(s) 2016

Suggested Citation

  • M. Lette & W. Bemelmans & J. Breda & L. Slobbe & J. Dias & H. Boshuizen, 2016. "Health care costs attributable to overweight calculated in a standardized way for three European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(1), pages 61-69, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:61-69
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0655-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10198-014-0655-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-014-0655-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Orosz & David Morgan, 2004. "SHA-Based National Health Accounts in Thirteen OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," OECD Health Working Papers 16, OECD Publishing.
    2. Pieter H M van Baal & Johan J Polder & G Ardine de Wit & Rudolf T Hoogenveen & Talitha L Feenstra & Hendriek C Boshuizen & Peter M Engelfriet & Werner B F Brouwer, 2008. "Lifetime Medical Costs of Obesity: Prevention No Cure for Increasing Health Expenditure," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, February.
    3. A. Konnopka & M. Bödemann & H.-H. König, 2011. "Health burden and costs of obesity and overweight in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(4), pages 345-352, August.
    4. Heijink, Richard & Noethen, Manuela & Renaud, Thomas & Koopmanschap, Marc & Polder, Johan, 2008. "Cost of illness: An international comparison: Australia, Canada, France, Germany and The Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 49-61, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesse D Malkin & Drishti Baid & Reem F Alsukait & Taghred Alghaith & Mohammed Alluhidan & Hana Alabdulkarim & Abdulaziz Altowaijri & Ziyad S Almalki & Christopher H Herbst & Eric Andrew Finkelstein & , 2022. "The economic burden of overweight and obesity in Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Maximilian Tremmel & Ulf-G. Gerdtham & Peter M. Nilsson & Sanjib Saha, 2017. "Economic Burden of Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens & Claire Carette & Claire Rives-Lange & Joane Matta & Marcel Goldberg & Philippe Juvin & Marie Zins & Sebastien Czernichow, 2018. "Obesity and emergency care in the French CONSTANCES cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Margherita d’Errico & Milena Pavlova & Federico Spandonaro, 2022. "The economic burden of obesity in Italy: a cost-of-illness study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(2), pages 177-192, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Effertz & Susanne Engel & Frank Verheyen & Roland Linder, 2016. "The costs and consequences of obesity in Germany: a new approach from a prevalence and life-cycle perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(9), pages 1141-1158, December.
    2. Pieter van Baal & Meg Perry‐Duxbury & Pieter Bakx & Matthijs Versteegh & Eddy van Doorslaer & Werner Brouwer, 2019. "A cost‐effectiveness threshold based on the marginal returns of cardiovascular hospital spending," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 87-100, January.
    3. Donal O'Neill & Olive Sweetman, 2013. "Estimating Obesity Rates in Europe in the Presence of Self-Reporting Errors," Economics Department Working Paper Series n236-13.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    4. Lauber, Verena & Thomas, Lampert, 2014. "The Effect of Early Universal Daycare on Child Weight Problems," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100399, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Strulik, Holger, 2014. "A mass phenomenon: The social evolution of obesity," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 113-125.
    6. Pieter H. M. van Baal & Talitha L. Feenstra & Johan J. Polder & Rudolf T. Hoogenveen & Werner B. F. Brouwer, 2011. "Economic evaluation and the postponement of health care costs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 432-445, April.
    7. Nhung Nghiem & Tony Blakely & Linda J Cobiac & Amber L Pearson & Nick Wilson, 2015. "Health and Economic Impacts of Eight Different Dietary Salt Reduction Interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Mathauer, Inke & Nicolle, Emmanuelle, 2011. "A global overview of health insurance administrative costs: what are the reasons for variations found?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 235-246.
    9. Allison Larg & John Moss, 2011. "Cost-of-Illness Studies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 653-671, August.
    10. Giorgio Brunello & Pierre-Carl Michaud & Anna Sanz-de-Galdeano, 2008. "The Rise in Obesity Across the Atlantic An Economic Perspective," Working Papers WR-586, RAND Corporation.
    11. Bredenkamp, Caryn & Gragnolati, Michele, 2008. "Sustainability of health care financing in the western Balkans: an overview of progress and challenges," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 11(2), pages 151-184.
    12. Margherita d’Errico & Milena Pavlova & Federico Spandonaro, 2022. "The economic burden of obesity in Italy: a cost-of-illness study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(2), pages 177-192, March.
    13. Simon Wieser & Marco Riguzzi & Mark Pletscher & Carola A. Huber & Harry Telser & Matthias Schwenkglenks, 2018. "How much does the treatment of each major disease cost? A decomposition of Swiss National Health Accounts," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(8), pages 1149-1161, November.
    14. Luqman Tariq & Matthijs van den Berg & Rudolf T Hoogenveen & Pieter H M van Baal, 2009. "Cost-Effectiveness of an Opportunistic Screening Programme and Brief Intervention for Excessive Alcohol Use in Primary Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-8, May.
    15. Son Nghiem & Rasheda Khanam & Xuan-Binh Vu & Bach Xuan Tran, 2020. "Implicitly Estimating the Cost of Mental Illness in Australia: A Standard-of-Living Approach," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 261-270, April.
    16. O’Neill, Donal, 2015. "Measuring obesity in the absence of a gold standard," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 116-128.
    17. Richard A. Dunn & Nathan W. Tefft, 2014. "Has Increased Body Weight Made Driving Safer?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(11), pages 1374-1389, November.
    18. Ren, Yanjun & Castro Campos, Bente & Loy, Jens-Peter & Brosig, Stephan, 2019. "Low-income and overweight in China: Evidence from a life-course utility model," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(8), pages 1753-1767.
    19. Brunello, Giorgio & Michaud, Pierre-Carl & Sanz-de-Galdeano, Anna, 2008. "The Rise in Obesity across the Atlantic: An Economic Perspective," IZA Discussion Papers 3529, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    20. Kanters, Tim A. & Brouwer, Werner B.F. & van Vliet, René C.J.A. & van Baal, Pieter H.M. & Polder, Johan J., 2013. "A new prevention paradox: The trade-off between reducing incentives for risk selection and increasing the incentives for prevention for health insurers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 150-158.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Overweight; Cost calculation; Health care costs; Macrolevel data; C82; I19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C82 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data; Data Access
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:17:y:2016:i:1:p:61-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.