IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v45y2025i1d10.1007_s10669-024-09997-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping life cycle assessment (LCA) scientific research in agriculture: what do we still have to do?

Author

Listed:
  • Kássio R. G. Lucas

    (University of California)

  • Carlos Eduardo Caldarelli

    (State University of Londrina)

  • Maurício Ursi Ventura

    (State University of Londrina)

  • Longlong Tang

    (Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization)

  • Kiyotada Hayashi

    (EarthShift Global, Asia G.K)

  • Naoki Yoshikawa

    (The University of Shiga Prefecture)

Abstract

Scientific literature documents and dictates the direction of knowledge and to recognize it we rely on techniques that compile information to point out the next paths in science. One of the promising techniques is bibliometric analysis, especially when applied to the recent and under developing approach, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Considering that the methodology still has limitations and can generate simplified results, we sought to map its characteristics in agricultural use, characterizing the evolution and trends of scientific research when using LCA in the agricultural sector over a period of twenty years, from 2002 to 2022. We used bibliometric analysis for a systematic review of the literature, using the Scopus repository as a database. To organize and process the data, we used the VOSviewer software. It was found 4943 articles, of which the publication peaks occurred in the last ten years, published predominantly by journals related to environmental sciences. This is due to the study characteristics being mainly focused on methodology improving. They have been produced mainly in the USA, Europe, and China, without emphasis on regions, such as Latin America, Africa, and Asia, although they largely concentrate global agricultural production and with relevant sustainability challenges. Through bibliometric analysis, three main clusters were formed: Impact Assessment (which deals with methodological development); Types of products (about raw materials for alternative energy production); and Substances and activities (particularly substances related to greenhouse gas emissions and activities related to animal and feed farming). We note that the methodology still neglects certain types of impacts, such as biodiversity loss, soil degradation, and partly the (eco) toxicity of pesticides. The methodology is still insufficient for decision-making, with a limited understanding of agricultural functions and difficulties in modeling certain persistent effects, although it continues to be strategically improved. Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Kássio R. G. Lucas & Carlos Eduardo Caldarelli & Maurício Ursi Ventura & Longlong Tang & Kiyotada Hayashi & Naoki Yoshikawa, 2025. "Mapping life cycle assessment (LCA) scientific research in agriculture: what do we still have to do?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09997-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-024-09997-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-024-09997-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-024-09997-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:45:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10669-024-09997-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.