IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i5d10.1007_s10668-022-02244-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of dynamic incentives on the recycling of livestock and poultry manure in a multiscenario evolutionary game

Author

Listed:
  • L. X. Xiong

    (Central South University of Forestry and Technology
    Universite de Lille)

  • X. Y. Li

    (Central South University of Forestry and Technology)

  • J. J. Ning

    (Central South University of Forestry and Technology)

  • Y. R. Dong

    (Central South University of Forestry and Technology)

  • Y. Yan

    (Central South University of Forestry and Technology)

Abstract

Accelerating the recycling of livestock and poultry manure is an important direction to control nonpoint-source pollution in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Based on evolutionary game theory, this study analyzes the complex behavioral interaction between farmers and breeding enterprises. We define the ideal scenarios and clarify the influence of key variables on the equilibrium results. The results show the following: (1) Replication dynamic analysis and an evolution phase diagram show that the optimal behavior strategy of farmers and breeding enterprises is organic fertilizer and recycling, and the evolutionary game between the parties tends toward the optimal solution. (2) When the government subsidy was $$\mu \hspace{0.17em}$$ μ = 0.55, farmers’ and breeding enterprises’ strategies tend to reach the optimal equilibrium the fastest after 3 weeks and 1 week, respectively; when government administrative efficiency was $$k\hspace{0.17em}$$ k = 5, farmers’ and breeding enterprises’ strategies tend to reach the optimal equilibrium the fastest after 10 weeks and 1 week, respectively. (3) Taking Anhua County of Hunan Province as an example, during the period of 2018–2020, the subsidy standard gradually increased from 25 to 45%, and the administrative efficiency increased by 63.3%. The enterprises involved in reconstruction to recycle waste increased by 218.9% and 132.2% in 2018–2019 and 2019–2020, respectively, which verifies the effectiveness of the evolutionary equilibrium results. The conclusions of this study can provide a reference for decision making regarding the fecal waste recycling of breeding enterprises and farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • L. X. Xiong & X. Y. Li & J. J. Ning & Y. R. Dong & Y. Yan, 2023. "The effects of dynamic incentives on the recycling of livestock and poultry manure in a multiscenario evolutionary game," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4301-4333, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02244-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02244-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02244-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02244-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. C. Hadrich & J. J. Jackson, 2014. "Livestock emissions regulation with unknown damages and strategic technology adoption," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(35), pages 4309-4317, December.
    2. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Godefroy Grosjean & Sabine Fuss & Nicolas Koch & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Stéphane De Cara & William Acworth, 2018. "Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 151-169, February.
    4. Mark H. Cooper & Jonathan Boston & John Bright, 2013. "Policy challenges for livestock emissions abatement: lessons from New Zealand," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 110-133, January.
    5. Xi, Xuan & Zhang, Yulin, 2021. "Complexity analysis of production, fertilizer-saving level, and emission reduction efforts decisions in a two-parallel agricultural product supply chain," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Li, Jiangong & Akdeniz, Neslihan & Kim, Harrison Hyung Min & Gates, Richard S. & Wang, Xinlei & Wang, Kaiying, 2021. "Quantification of sustainable animal manure utilization strategies in Hangzhou, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Martey, Edward & Kuwornu, John K.M. & Adjebeng-Danquah, Joseph, 2019. "Estimating the effect of mineral fertilizer use on Land productivity and income: Evidence from Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 463-475.
    8. Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio & Sagebiel, Julian & Rommel, Jens & Olschewski, Roland, 2021. "Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Solinas, Stefania & Tiloca, Maria Teresa & Deligios, Paola A. & Cossu, Marco & Ledda, Luigi, 2021. "Carbon footprints and social carbon cost assessments in a perennial energy crop system: A comparison of fertilizer management practices in a Mediterranean area," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Dai, Xiao-wen & Sun, Zhanli & Müller, Daniel, 2021. "Driving factors of direct greenhouse gas emissions from China’s pig industry from 1976 to 2016," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 319-329.
    11. Ji, Shou-feng & Zhao, Dan & Luo, Rong-juan, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kreft, Cordelia & Huber, Robert & Wuepper, David & Finger, Robert, 2021. "The role of non-cognitive skills in farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Jia Liu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Dynamic Game Analysis on Cooperative Advertising Strategy in a Manufacturer-Led Supply Chain with Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2022. "Risk preferences, intra-household dynamics and spatial effects on chemical inputs use: Case of small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Wenhui Zhao & Yimeng Liu & Jiansheng Hou & Lifang Liu, 2023. "Impact of Carbon Trading Mechanism Considering Blockchain Technology on the Evolution of New Energy Vehicle Industry in the Post-Subsidy Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince Maxwell & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2020. "Welfare impacts of climate-smart agriculture in Ghana: Does row planting and drought-tolerant maize varieties matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Kerstin Jantke & Martina J. Hartmann & Livia Rasche & Benjamin Blanz & Uwe A. Schneider, 2020. "Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Knowledge and Positions of German Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Alisa Spiegel & Claudia Heidecke & Julio G. Fournier Gabela & Davit Stepanyan & Mareike Söder & Florian Freund & Alexander Gocht & Martin Banse & Bernhard Osterburg, 2024. "Climate Change Mitigation in Agriculture beyond 2030: Options for Carbon Pricing and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 23(1), pages 19-27, April.
    10. Qingbo Tan & Zhuning Wang & Wei Fan & Xudong Li & Xiangguang Li & Fanqi Li & Zihao Zhao, 2022. "Development Path and Model Design of a New Energy Vehicle in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2018. "Transaction costs, market structure and efficient coverage of emissions trading scheme: A microlevel study from the pilots in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 657-671.
    12. Tyllianakis, Emmanouil & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Ziv, Guy & Chapman, Pippa J. & Holden, Joseph & Cardwell, Michael & Fyfe, Duncan, 2023. "A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from a post-Brexit analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Dongpu Fu & Jiarui Sun & Cuiyou Yao & Fulei Shi, 2024. "The influence of policy incentives on the diffusion of battery-swapping taxis and stations: a coupled evolutionary game model in complex networks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26945-26969, October.
    14. Zhao, Dan & Ji, Shou-feng & Wang, He-ping & Jiang, Li-wen, 2021. "How do government subsidies promote new energy vehicle diffusion in the complex network context? A three-stage evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Lihua Ma & Jiupai Ni & Luuk Fleskens & Han Wang & Yunqing Xuan, 2021. "Modelling Fertilizer Use in Relation to Farmers’ Household Characteristics in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Anang, Benjamin Tetteh & Kandawini, Naomi Alareba & Fearon, James, 2022. "Effect of Fertilizer Study on Maize Productivity of Peasant Farmers in Northern Ghana," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 43(2), January.
    17. Limei Liu & Zhe Liu & Yi Yang & Biao Shi & Xingbao Liu, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Abandoned-Bike-Sharing Recycling: Impact of Recycling Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Prince Maxwell Etwire & Isaac Koomson & Edward Martey, 2022. "Impact of climate change adaptation on farm productivity and household welfare," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Wang, Yadong & Mao, Jinqi & Chen, Fan & Wang, Delu, 2022. "Uncovering the dynamics and uncertainties of substituting coal power with renewable energy resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 669-686.
    20. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Zheng, 2022. "Dynamic analysis of the decision of authorized remanufacturing supply chain affected by government subsidies under cap-and-trade policies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02244-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.