IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i2d10.1007_s10668-022-02134-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra L. Cobos-Mora

    (Universidad Católica de Cuenca
    University of Sevilla)

  • José Guamán-Aucapiña

    (Universidad Católica de Cuenca)

  • Jonathan Zúñiga-Ruiz

    (Universidad Católica de Cuenca)

Abstract

To guarantee a dignified life in low-incoming countries where socio-environmental negative implications derived from the municipal solid waste (MSW) by its excessive generation, lack of governance, and financial resources, sustainable and integrated solutions are required. From this perspective, well-located transfer stations (TSs) are conceived as an alternative to improve MSW management quality in municipalities that generate little MSW and have long transportation distances. Consequently, this research aims to find optimum areas to locate TSs in the province of Azuay-Ecuador as a commonwealth proposal. It applies a multi-criteria decision analysis based on geographic information systems with the analytical hierarchical process technique: a heuristic and scalable method that simultaneously evaluates subjective and non-monetized inputs. The authors faced it from a holistic perspective in a three-level hierarchical structure; starting from categories: technical, environmental, economic, and social; then criteria: rivers, protected areas, populated areas, land use, educational centers, health centers, tourist sites, basic services, roads, gravity centers, geology, power grid, and slopes; and finally, sub-criteria defined by criteria´s measurable attributes. This research provides local decision-makers with middle-scale tools and a first diagnosis to focus later efforts in local studios over potential sites. The results showed that 79.12% of the study area was restrictive to place a TS. The remaining territory suitability index values between 13 and 89% were found, with possible TSs at Paute, Sigsig, and Nabón to serve nine from fifteen cantons.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra L. Cobos-Mora & José Guamán-Aucapiña & Jonathan Zúñiga-Ruiz, 2023. "Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1944-1977, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02134-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02134-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02134-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02134-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasser Ebrahimian Ghajari & Ali Asghar Alesheikh & Mahdi Modiri & Reza Hosnavi & Morteza Abbasi, 2017. "Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Chatzouridis, Constantinos & Komilis, Dimitrios, 2012. "A methodology to optimally site and design municipal solid waste transfer stations using binary programming," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 89-98.
    3. Claudia Marcela Betancourt Morales & Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa, 2020. "Circular economy in Latin America: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2479-2497, September.
    4. Parviz Mohamadzadeh & Samereh Pourmoradian & Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi & Mathias Vogdrup-Schmidt, 2020. "A GIS-Based Approach for Spatially-Explicit Sustainable Development Assessments in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Yasir Ahmed Solangi & Qingmei Tan & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Ifzal Ahmed, 2018. "The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Eiselt, H.A. & Marianov, Vladimir, 2014. "A bi-objective model for the location of landfills for municipal solid waste," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 187-194.
    7. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    8. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Fallah, Samira & Ruiz, Rubén & Hosseini, Sara & Asgari, Nasrin, 2019. "OR models in urban service facility location: A critical review of applications and future developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 1-27.
    9. Hao Yu & Wei Deng Solvang, 2017. "A multi-objective location-allocation optimization for sustainable management of municipal solid waste," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 289-308, September.
    10. Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Jinyun & Yang, Zhifeng & Li, Juan, 2012. "Analysis of the distribution and evolution of energy supply and demand centers of gravity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 695-706.
    11. Ali Azadeh & Kimia Ahmadzadeh & Hossein Eslami, 2019. "Location optimization of municipal solid waste considering health, safety, environmental, and economic factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(7), pages 1185-1204, June.
    12. Kirca, Omer & Erkip, Nesim, 1988. "Selecting transfer station locations for large solid waste systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 339-349, June.
    13. Jeffrey C. Cegan & Ashley M. Filion & Jeffrey M. Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 123-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Dai & Yi Chen, 2023. "Integrated dynamic municipal solid waste transfer station location decision study based on the dynamic MSW generation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6033-6047, July.
    2. Jing Liang & Ming Liu, 2018. "Network Design for Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A Case Study of the Nanjing Jiangbei New Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Milad Zamanifar & Timo Hartmann, 2021. "A prescriptive framework for recommending decision attributes of infrastructure disaster recovery problems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 633-650, December.
    4. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    6. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2021. "Evaluating Decision Making in Sustainable Project Selection Between Literature and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Laura Tupenaite & Irene Lill & Ineta Geipele & Jurga Naimaviciene, 2017. "Ranking of Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the New Housing Development Projects: Case of the Baltic States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, October.
    8. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    9. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    10. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    11. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    13. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    14. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.
    15. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Nora Mzavanadze, 2009. "Building A Framework For National Sustainable Development Assessment And Application For Lithuania: Sustainability In Transition," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 97-130.
    17. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    18. Isin Ceti̇n, 2017. "Accounting Requirements And Records On Bank Subscribed Capital Compliance With European Directives," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 52-68, February.
    19. Jean-Michel Sahuta & Sandrine Boulerne & Medhi Mili & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. "What Relation Exists Between Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) And Longevity Of Firms?," Working Papers 2014-248, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    20. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02134-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.