IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v60y2012icp89-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology to optimally site and design municipal solid waste transfer stations using binary programming

Author

Listed:
  • Chatzouridis, Constantinos
  • Komilis, Dimitrios

Abstract

Mathematical programming has been often used to optimize municipal solid waste management and transfer systems. The objective of this work was to develop a practical methodology to aid in the optimal design of a solid waste collection network in regions with well-specified boundaries. The objective function was a non-linear equation that minimized total collection cost. The cost comprised the capital and operating costs of: (i) the waste transfer stations, (ii) the waste collection vehicles, (iii) the semitrailers and tractors as well as the waste collection within a community, and the cost to haul the wastes to the transfer stations or to the landfills. The adjustable (decision) variables were binary variables that designated whether a path between two nodes is valid or not. Binary variables were also used to designate whether a transfer station should be constructed or not. In this methodology, the waste production nodes and their waste production rates were specified. The locations of all candidate waste transfer stations were designated using two alternative GIS-based siting methodologies; the locations of the final nodes (landfills) were precisely specified too. The actual travel distances and times among all nodes were the main input variables. The model was developed in an Excel® spreadsheet and was applied to a Hellenic region that has 53 municipalities. The candidate transfer stations sited in the region were 47 and one or two landfills were present in the system. The optimal solution suggested that 47 and 6 municipalities should direct their wastes to 12 transfer stations and to 2 landfills, respectively. The 12 transfer stations should then transfer their wastes to their adjacent landfills. The optimal collection cost was €42.4t−1. A sensitivity analysis concluded that fuel cost was the most sensitive parameter in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatzouridis, Constantinos & Komilis, Dimitrios, 2012. "A methodology to optimally site and design municipal solid waste transfer stations using binary programming," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 89-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:60:y:2012:i:c:p:89-98
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344911002515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulcar, Thierry, 1996. "Optimizing solid waste collection in Brussels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 71-77, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minoglou, Minas & Komilis, Dimitrios, 2013. "Optimizing the treatment and disposal of municipal solid wastes using mathematical programming—A case study in a Greek region," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 46-57.
    2. Feng Dai & Yi Chen, 2023. "Integrated dynamic municipal solid waste transfer station location decision study based on the dynamic MSW generation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6033-6047, July.
    3. Sandra L. Cobos-Mora & José Guamán-Aucapiña & Jonathan Zúñiga-Ruiz, 2023. "Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1944-1977, February.
    4. Radovan Šomplák & Jiří Kropáč & Jaroslav Pluskal & Martin Pavlas & Boris Urbánek & Petra Vítková, 2022. "A Multi-Commodity Mathematical Modelling Approach—Hazardous Waste Treatment Infrastructure Planning in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E D Adamides & P Mitropoulos & I Giannikos & I Mitropoulos, 2009. "A multi-methodological approach to the development of a regional solid waste management system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 758-770, June.
    2. Sahar Validi & Arijit Bhattacharya & P. J. Byrne, 2020. "Sustainable distribution system design: a two-phase DoE-guided meta-heuristic solution approach for a three-echelon bi-objective AHP-integrated location-routing model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 191-222, July.
    3. Roberto Baldacci & Aristide Mingozzi & Roberto Wolfler Calvo, 2011. "An Exact Method for the Capacitated Location-Routing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1284-1296, October.
    4. Maqsood, Imran & Huang, Guo H. & Scott Yeomans, Julian, 2005. "An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 208-225, November.
    5. Nagy, Gabor & Salhi, Said, 2007. "Location-routing: Issues, models and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 649-672, March.
    6. ReVelle, C. S. & Eiselt, H. A., 2005. "Location analysis: A synthesis and survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Validi, Sahar & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Byrne, P.J., 2014. "A case analysis of a sustainable food supply chain distribution system—A multi-objective approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-87.
    8. Wang, Yong & Peng, Shouguo & Zhou, Xuesong & Mahmoudi, Monirehalsadat & Zhen, Lu, 2020. "Green logistics location-routing problem with eco-packages," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Mahdi Bashiri & Zeinab Rasoulinejad & Ehsan Fallahzade, 2016. "A new approach on auxiliary vehicle assignment in capacitated location routing problem," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 886-902, March.
    10. Rieck, Julia & Ehrenberg, Carsten & Zimmermann, Jürgen, 2014. "Many-to-many location-routing with inter-hub transport and multi-commodity pickup-and-delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 863-878.
    11. Wy, Juyoung & Kim, Byung-In & Kim, Seongbae, 2013. "The rollon–rolloff waste collection vehicle routing problem with time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 466-476.
    12. Shmelev, S.E. & Powell, J.R., 2006. "Ecological-economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 115-130, August.
    13. Li, Jing-Quan & Borenstein, Denis & Mirchandani, Pitu B., 2008. "Truck scheduling for solid waste collection in the City of Porto Alegre, Brazil," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1133-1149, December.
    14. Bogh, Morten Bie & Mikkelsen, Hardy & Wøhlk, Sanne, 2014. "Collection of recyclables from cubes – A case study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 127-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:60:y:2012:i:c:p:89-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.