IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i2d10.1007_s10668-021-02080-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of symbiotic of waste resources ecosystem: a case study of Hunan Miluo Recycling Economy Industrial Park in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuesong Xu

    (Hunan University of Technology and Business
    Hunan Province Engineering Research Center of Ecologic Environment Big Data and Intelligent Decision-Making Technology)

  • Yun Su

    (Hunan University of Technology and Business)

  • Hongyan Shao

    (Hunan University of Technology and Business)

  • Songqiang Huang

    (Hunan University of Technology and Business)

  • Gengchen Liu

    (Hunan University of Technology and Business)

Abstract

China had approved to construct 49 urban mineral industry demonstration bases from 2010 to 2015, which indicated that the Chinese Resource Recycling Industry (RRI) has been transferred into the social circulation patterns process after experiencing a micro-pattern and park-pattern. With the rapid progress of industrial process, the RRI presents some features just like system relationship is increasingly tight coupling, technology integration and innovation are accelerating, affecting factors are more complex, policy response is more sensitive, etc. All these changes have made the research of industry ecosystem symbiosis more complicated. In this paper, we divide the renewable resource recycling system into “management, marketization, supply, recovery, resource” five sub-systems firstly, then analyze the industry ecosystem symbiotic relationship by integrating the use of complex system theory and catastrophe progression model. Secondly, we establish the comprehensive evaluation index system including symbiosis mode, symbiosis environment and symbiosis level. We conduct Catastrophe Progression Method (CPM) into the comprehensive evaluation of the industrial symbiosis ecosystem. By using the control variables and state variables of CPM, the key factors and indexes changes are described. Finally, the model and method are utilized for evaluating Hunan Miluo Recycling Economy Industrial Park development between 2013 and 2018. The results are found to be coincident with a practical situation, which proves that the catastrophe progression method works well. The method is proved to be feasible in practice and has high objectivity and reference value.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuesong Xu & Yun Su & Hongyan Shao & Songqiang Huang & Gengchen Liu, 2023. "Evaluation of symbiotic of waste resources ecosystem: a case study of Hunan Miluo Recycling Economy Industrial Park in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1131-1150, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02080-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-02080-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-02080-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-02080-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fraccascia, Luca & Yazan, Devrim Murat & Albino, Vito & Zijm, Henk, 2020. "The role of redundancy in industrial symbiotic business development: A theoretical framework explored by agent-based simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Parida, Vinit & Burström, Thommie & Visnjic, Ivanka & Wincent, Joakim, 2019. "Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 715-725.
    3. Xue Wan & Xiaoning Yang & Quaner Wen & Jun Gang & Lu Gan, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Industry–Environmental System Based on Resilience Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Lynda Aissani & Antoine Lacassagne & Jean‐Baptiste Bahers & Samuel Le Féon, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of industrial symbiosis: A critical review of relevant reference scenarios," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(4), pages 972-985, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Re, Beatrice & Magnani, Giovanna, 2022. "Value co-creation in circular entrepreneurship: An exploratory study on born circular SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 189-207.
    2. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Gozacan-Chase, Nazlican & Lafci, Cisem & Batista, Luciano, 2022. "Assessing smart circular supply chain readiness and maturity level of small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-392.
    3. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Sun, Qiao & Wang, Chang & Zhou, Yifang & Zuo, Lyushui & Song, Huiling, 2023. "How to build business ecosystems for e-waste online recycling platforms: A comparative study of two typical cases in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Kamalaldin, Anmar & Sjödin, David & Hullova, Dusana & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Configuring ecosystem strategies for digitally enabled process innovation: A framework for equipment suppliers in the process industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Matzner, Martin & Pauli, Tobias & Marx, Emanuel & Anke, Jürgen & Poeppelbuss, Jens & Fielt, Erwin & Gregor, Shirley & Sun, Ruonan & Hydle, Katja Maria & Aas, Tor Helge & Aanestad, Margunn & Gordijn, J, 2021. "Transitioning to Platform-based Services and Business Models in a B2B Environment," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(3), pages 143-162.
    8. Luhas, Jukka & Mikkilä, Mirja & Kylkilahti, Eliisa & Miettinen, Jenni & Malkamäki, Arttu & Pätäri, Satu & Korhonen, Jaana & Pekkanen, Tiia-Lotta & Tuppura, Anni & Lähtinen, Katja & Autio, Minna & Linn, 2021. "Pathways to a forest-based bioeconomy in 2060 within policy targets on climate change mitigation and biodiversity protection," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Jonas Nygaard Uhrenholt & Jesper Hemdrup Kristensen & Maria Camila Rincón & Sofie Adamsen & Steffen Foldager Jensen & Brian Vejrum Waehrens, 2022. "Maturity Model as a Driver for Circular Economy Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Burström, Thommie & Lahti, Tom & Parida, Vinit & Wartiovaara, Markus & Wincent, Joakim, 2023. "A definition, review, and extension of global ecosystems theory: Trends, architecture and orchestration of global VCs and mechanisms behind unicorns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Beatriz de Souza Mello Gonçalves & Flávio Leonel de Carvalho & Paula de Camargo Fiorini, 2022. "Circular Economy and Financial Aspects: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-41, March.
    12. Bonomi Santos, Juliana & Fernandes, Aline Rodrigues & de Oliveira, Pedro Tonhozi & Maia, Laís Moltene & Partyka, Raul Beal, 2023. "Increasing entrepreneurial ecosystem-level outcomes through orchestration: A proposed framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Bressanelli, Gianmarco & Visintin, Filippo & Saccani, Nicola, 2022. "Circular Economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    14. Howard, Mickey & Böhm, Steffen & Eatherley, Dan, 2022. "Systems resilience and SME multilevel challenges: A place-based conceptualization of the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 757-768.
    15. Ranjit Gupta & Cristian Mejia & Shuan Sadreghazi & Yuki Sano & Leticia Sarmento Dos Muchangos & Tomonori Sekiguchi & Hiromi Nakamura & Yuya Kajikawa, 2024. "Traders as ecosystem orchestrators for sustainable foods supply chain transformation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4024-4038, July.
    16. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Sonia Herrero-Luna & Marta Ferrer-Serrano & María Pilar Latorre-Martínez, 2022. "Circular Economy and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 65-84.
    18. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali & Roger Strange, 2022. "Proactive and reactive views in the transition towards circular business models. A grounded study in the plastic packaging industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1073-1102, September.
    19. Patwa, Nitin & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Seetharaman, Arumugam & Sarkar, Sabyasachi & Maiti, Kausik & Hingorani, Kunal, 2021. "Towards a circular economy: An emerging economies context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 725-735.
    20. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02080-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.