IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i2d10.1007_s10668-021-01536-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating impacts of researchers to enable sustainability transition: using urban ecosystem service literature as an exemplary field

Author

Listed:
  • Herlin Chien

    (National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
    United Nations University)

Abstract

The increasing stress of urbanization on ecosystem services has attracted the attention of UN SDG 11 on sustainable cities while alerting other policymakers at the regional and municipality levels. However, the ways in which the scientific community can support or propel cities to make critical future sustainability transitions have remained unclear. To provide partial answers, this study proposed to systematically analyze impacts of researchers in the existing urban ecosystem service (UES) literature as an exemplary field. Methodologically this study first designed a transition management scale and then adopted the scale to assess the existing roles of researchers played within the UES literature. A total of 203 UES journal articles up to 2018 were extracted from two databases as the exemplified literature, and the evaluation process was designed to be two-tiered. First tier of the analysis showed which cities around the world received the most scholarly attention to investigate the issue of urban ecosystem service. The second tier of the evaluation specifically aimed to uncover impacts of researchers to promote process-oriented approach rather than knowledge-first approach to enable urban transition. Asides from the general contribution, four specific impacts of researchers were evaluated: (1) the ability to define the problem of sustainability with other stakeholders (ownership); (2) willingness to negotiate what is sustainable in dialogues (sustainability); (3) capability to balance power dynamics to facilitate societal learning space (power); and (4) interest in making real-world change (action). The overall analysis first revealed the general lack of UES researchers in geographic areas that are urbanizing faster such as Asia and Africa. Then, the work identified two significant deficiencies in impacts of UES researchers to enable urban transition. One deficiency lies in how only 3% of the identified UES studies provided policy recommendations or action to secure science–policy linkage. The other missing part is the comparatively low number of solution-oriented researches with lowest mean value of action among the four variables. In other words, there is currently a shortage of researchers in UES literature to solve the unsustainability of real-world problems with non-academic stakeholders and local communities. The study concluded by arguing that scientists can contribute more to urban sustainability transition if they can be encouraged to play more roles to explore not only what the knowledge “is” but also what “ought to be” and “can be” by engaging in inter-sectoral collaboration and non-scientists.

Suggested Citation

  • Herlin Chien, 2022. "Evaluating impacts of researchers to enable sustainability transition: using urban ecosystem service literature as an exemplary field," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2345-2361, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01536-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01536-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01536-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01536-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:lib:000cis:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:27-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kaczorowska, Anna & Kain, Jaan-Henrik & Kronenberg, Jakub & Haase, Dagmar, 2016. "Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: Integration challenges in complex urban settings—Case of Stockholm," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 204-212.
    3. Rotmans, J., 2005. "Societal Innovation: between dream and reality lies complexity," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management 7293, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    4. Hodson, Mike & Marvin, Simon, 2010. "Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 477-485, May.
    5. Dennis, M. & James, P., 2016. "Site-specific factors in the production of local urban ecosystem services: A case study of community-managed green space," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 208-216.
    6. Iwona Szumacher & Piotr Pabjanek, 2017. "Temporal Changes in Ecosystem Services in European Cities in the Continental Biogeographical Region in the Period from 1990–2012," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Hamid El Bilali, 2020. "Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1693-1728, March.
    8. Peleg Kremer & Neele Larondelle & Yimin Zhang & Elise Pasles & Dagmar Haase, 2018. "Within-Class and Neighborhood Effects on the Relationship between Composite Urban Classes and Surface Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Andrew Almeter & Arik Tashie & Andrew Procter & Tara McAlexander & Douglas Browning & Charles Rudder & Laura Jackson & Rochelle Araujo, 2018. "A Needs-Driven, Multi-Objective Approach to Allocate Urban Ecosystem Services from 10,000 Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuanyuan Li & Zhenmin Ding & Shunbo Yao & Caixia Xue & Yuanjie Deng & Lei Jia & Chaoqing Chai & Xiao Zhang, 2022. "How to Price Ecosystem Water Yield Service and Determine the Amount of Compensation?—The Wei River Basin in China as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heidi M. Peterson & Lawrence A. Baker & Rimjhim M. Aggarwal & Treavor H. Boyer & Neng Iong Chan, 2022. "A transition management framework to stimulate a circular phosphorus system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1713-1737, February.
    2. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    4. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    5. Matthew Dennis & David Barlow & Gina Cavan & Penny A. Cook & Anna Gilchrist & John Handley & Philip James & Jessica Thompson & Konstantinos Tzoulas & C. Philip Wheater & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Mapping Urban Green Infrastructure: A Novel Landscape-Based Approach to Incorporating Land Use and Land Cover in the Mapping of Human-Dominated Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Barbanente, Angela & Grassini, Laura, 2022. "Fostering transitions in landscape policies: A multi-level perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Feltynowski, Marcin, 2023. "Urban green spaces in land-use policy – types of data, sources of data and staff – the case of Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    9. Giorgia Silvestri & Julia M. Wittmayer & Karlijn Schipper & Robinah Kulabako & Sampson Oduro-Kwarteng & Philip Nyenje & Hans Komakech & Roel Van Raak, 2018. "Transition Management for Improving the Sustainability of WASH Services in Informal Settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa—An Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    11. Éric Verdeil, 2014. "The Contested Energy Future of Amman, Jordan: Between Promises of Alternative Energies and a Nuclear Venture," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(7), pages 1520-1536, May.
    12. David Gibbs & Kirstie O'Neill, 2014. "Rethinking Sociotechnical Transitions and Green Entrepreneurship: The Potential for Transformative Change in the Green Building Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(5), pages 1088-1107, May.
    13. Rimjhim M. Aggarwal, 2013. "Strategic Bundling of Development Policies with Adaptation: An Examination of Delhi's Climate Change Action Plan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1902-1915, November.
    14. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Mah, Daphne Ngar-yin & Cheung, Darren Man-wai & Leung, Michael K.H. & Wang, Maggie Yachao & Wong, Mandy Wai-ming & Lo, Kevin & Cheung, Altair T.F., 2021. "Policy mixes and the policy learning process of energy transitions: Insights from the feed-in tariff policy and urban community solar in Hong Kong," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Harry Geerlings & Bart Kuipers, 2013. "Smart governance and the management of sustainable mobility: an illustration of the application of policy integration and transition management in the Port of Rotterdam," Chapters, in: Thomas Vanoutrive & Ann Verhetsel (ed.), Smart Transport Networks, chapter 11, pages 224-247, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Bakel, J.C. & Loorbach, D.A. & Whiteman, G.M. & Rotmans, J., 2007. "Business Strategies for Transitions towards Sustainable Systems," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-094-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Kılkış, Şiir & Kılkış, Birol, 2019. "An urbanization algorithm for districts with minimized emissions based on urban planning and embodied energy towards net-zero exergy targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 392-406.
    19. Huasheng Zhu & Changwei Geng & Yawei Chen, 2024. "Urban–Rural Integration and Agricultural Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-33, October.
    20. Schäffler, Alexis & Swilling, Mark, 2013. "Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure — The Johannesburg case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 246-257.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01536-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.