IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i11d10.1007_s10668-021-01982-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State actions and the environment: examining the concept of ecological security in China

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Joseph

    (Hindustan Institute of Technology and Sciences (HITS))

  • Joe Thomas Karackattu

    (Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT-M))

Abstract

Modern China is a country that witnesses complex interactions of economic development and sustainability. Based on fieldwork in China, this study applies the Copenhagen School framework to examine the actors, processes and outcomes in prioritizing the environmental sector in China. The study aims specifically to unravel the peculiarities of behavioural changes of the state and society in ecological concerns that lead to the securitization process. It also reappraises the emerging trends in state-society relations in the context of prioritizing ecological security in the country. The study finds that the government under Xi Jinping in China has adopted a number of extra-ordinary measures in terms of legal frameworks and enforcement initiatives, in order to address public concerns emerging from the environmental sector. Major policy shifts towards environmental security include; assigning new functions for conventional security apparatus, prioritizing and elevating environmental institutions, improving top-level design of the environment management system and most significantly, promoting public participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Joseph & Joe Thomas Karackattu, 2022. "State actions and the environment: examining the concept of ecological security in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13057-13082, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01982-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01982-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01982-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01982-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shui-Yan Tang & Xueyong Zhan, 2008. "Civic Environmental NGOs, Civil Society, and Democratisation in China," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 425-448.
    2. Jin Ai, 2006. "Guanxi Networks in China: Its Importance and Future Trends," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 14(5), pages 105-118, September.
    3. Anjan Kumar Sahu, 2021. "From the Climate Change Threat to the Securitisation of Development: An Analysis of China," China Report, , vol. 57(2), pages 192-209, May.
    4. Ruxu Sheng & Rong Zhou & Ying Zhang & Zidi Wang, 2021. "Green Investment Changes in China: A Shift-Share Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Jonna Nyman & Jinghan Zeng, 2016. "Securitization in Chinese climate and energy politics," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 301-313, March.
    6. Sang Weiguo & Jan C. Axmacher, 2016. "China draws lines to green future," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7594), pages 305-305, March.
    7. Qidong Huang & Jiajun Xu, 2019. "Rethinking Environmental Bureaucracies in River Chiefs System (RCS) in China: A Critical Literature Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung, Ngo Thai, 2023. "Green investment, financial development, digitalization and economic sustainability in Vietnam: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression and wavelet coherence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    2. Yinghong Li & Jiaxin Tong & Longfei Wang, 2020. "Full Implementation of the River Chief System in China: Outcome and Weakness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Shiwang Yu & Jianxia Bao & Wen Ding & Xue Chen & Xiaonan Tang & Jianli Hao & Wei Zhang & Prateek Singh, 2021. "Investigating the Relationship between Public Satisfaction and Public Environmental Participation during Government Treatment of Urban Malodorous Black River in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Huijie Li & Ru Jia & Ortwin Renn & Tianjiao Xu, 2022. "Managing Risks Arising from Conservation Complexities of Forests: Insights from China’s “Chief Scheme” Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Jiankun LU & Pi-Han Tsai, 2017. "Signal and Political Accountability: Environmental Petitions in China," Economic Growth Centre Working Paper Series 1711, Nanyang Technological University, School of Social Sciences, Economic Growth Centre.
    6. Cho, Kang Rae & Huang, Chia-Hsing & Padmanabhan, Prasad, 2014. "Foreign ownership mode, executive compensation structure, and corporate governance: Has the literature missed an important link? Evidence from Taiwanese firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 371-380.
    7. Ramdani, Rijal & Lounela, Anu K., 2020. "Palm oil expansion in tropical peatland: Distrust between advocacy and service environmental NGOs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2021. "Economic Growth And Human Networking," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 5-25.
    9. Tebogo Rahaba Ngoma, 2016. "It is not whom you know, it is how well you know them: Foreign entrepreneurs building close guanxi relationships [Es geht nicht darum, wen du kennst, sondern wie gut du sie kennst: Wie ausländische," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 239-258, June.
    10. Jiankun Lu & Pi-Han Tsai, 2017. "Signal and political accountability: environmental petitions in China," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 391-418, November.
    11. Emina Popović, 2017. "Lobbying Practices of Citizens’ Groups in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    12. Siyu Fu & Kristian H. Nielsen, 2023. "Reviving natural history, building ecological civilisation: the philosophy and social significance of the Natural History Revival Movement in contemporary China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Karoliina Isoaho & Alexandra Goritz & Nicolai Schulz, 2016. "Governing clean energy transitions in China and India: A comparative political economy analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series 028, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Yi Liu & Cecil Pearson, 2011. "The Determining Factors of Western Australia’s (WA) Foreign Investment in China," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Le Tang & Fengqin Zhou & Xueliang Feng & Yali Luo, 2018. "Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Pattarin Adithipyangkul & Ilan Alon & Tianyu Zhang, 2011. "Executive perks: Compensation and corporate performance in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 401-425, June.
    17. He Chang & Huimin Liu & Shuai Jin, 2023. "Design of a river chief incentive mechanism based on blockchain: A principal–agent model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1534-1546, April.
    18. Susanne Rühle, 2011. "A Different Capitalism for China? The Role of Guanxi and the Family for Chinese Economic Development," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Hsieh, Chu-Chien & Yen, Liang-Kung, 2023. "Examining the cross-sector impact of NGOs' roles on forest-certification policy: An empirical study in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Linda K Westman & Vanesa Castán Broto, 2019. "Techno-economic rationalities as a political practice in urban environmental politics in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(2), pages 277-297, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01982-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.