IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v23y2023i3d10.1007_s10660-021-09519-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A product strategy for daily deal campaigns utilizing demand expansion and consumer leakage

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Tang

    (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)

Abstract

Daily deal campaigns help local service merchants expand their market demand, which also result in consumer leakage concerns. This paper investigates how to exercise product strategies, i.e., price and quality decisions, for daily deal campaigns through a systematic exploration of demand expansion and consumer leakage. We consider a local service merchant who currently sells a product in his or her local market and who might contract with a platform to introduce daily deal campaigns. We document how the demand expansion and consumer leakage effects jointly affect a merchant’s product strategy. Particularly, we find it not always profitable to introduce daily deal campaigns amid relatively low levels of the demand expansion effect. Moreover, a merchant should adopt the product strategy of overlooking (inhibiting) consumer leakage amid relatively low (high) levels of the consumer leakage effect. In addition, we discuss the strategic role of a platform’s agency fees on leveraging a merchant’s product strategy. Based on this, we take a platform’s perspective to examine how to establish optimal agency fees amid various market conditions. Our results provide useful insights for firms in the daily deal business on how to carry out more intelligent marketing strategies. Our conclusions also cater to other businesses, wherein offline merchants could adopt online platforms to expand their demand while addressing the issue of consumer leakage.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Tang, 2023. "A product strategy for daily deal campaigns utilizing demand expansion and consumer leakage," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1861-1883, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09519-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-021-09519-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-021-09519-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-021-09519-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Upender Subramanian & Ram C. Rao, 2016. "Leveraging Experienced Consumers to Attract New Consumers: An Equilibrium Analysis of Displaying Deal Sales by Daily Deal Websites," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3555-3575, December.
    2. Mantian (Mandy) Hu & Chu (Ivy) Dang & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2019. "Search and Learning at a Daily Deals Website," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 609-642, July.
    3. Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Xia, Lan, 2017. "The effectiveness of number of deals purchased in influencing consumers' response to daily deal promotions: A cue utilization approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 189-197.
    4. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2004. "Communication Strategies and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 304-316, January.
    5. (Catherine) Zhang, Jie & Savage, Scott J. & Chen, Yongmin, 2015. "Consumer uncertainty and price discrimination through online coupons: An empirical study of restaurants in Shanghai," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Liang Guo & Juanjuan Zhang, 2012. "Consumer Deliberation and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 995-1007, November.
    7. Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Scheinbaum, Angeline Close & Schaefers, Tobias, 2016. "Compulsive buying in online daily deal settings: An investigation of motivations and contextual elements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 691-699.
    8. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    9. Zike Cao & Kai-Lung Hui & Hong Xu, 2018. "When Discounts Hurt Sales: The Case of Daily-Deal Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 567-591, September.
    10. Ming Zhao & Yulan Wang & Xianghua Gan, 2016. "Signalling effect of daily deal promotion for a start-up service provider," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(2), pages 280-293, February.
    11. Chakravarthi Narasimhan, 1984. "A Price Discrimination Theory of Coupons," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 128-147.
    12. Serguei Netessine & Terry A. Taylor, 2007. "Product Line Design and Production Technology," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 101-117, 01-02.
    13. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 1998. "Product Line Design for a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 156-169.
    14. Tang, Yao & Chen, Rachel R. & Guan, Xu, 2021. "Daily-deal market with consumer retention: Price discrimination or quality differentiation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Chenxu Ke & Bo Yan & Ruofan Xu, 2017. "A group-buying mechanism for considering strategic consumer behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 721-752, December.
    16. Tong Che & Zeyu Peng & Zhongsheng Hua, 2016. "Characteristics of online group-buying website and consumers intention to revisit: the moderating effects of visit channels," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 171-188, June.
    17. Ming Hu & Xi Li & Mengze Shi, 2015. "Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 331-345, May.
    18. Lingling Zhang & Doug J. Chung, 2020. "Price Bargaining and Competition in Online Platforms: An Empirical Analysis of the Daily Deal Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 687-706, July.
    19. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1984. "Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 288-307.
    20. Song, Minjae & Park, Eunho & Yoo, Byungjoon & Jeon, Seongmin, 2016. "Is the Daily Deal Social Shopping?: An Empirical Analysis of Customer Panel Data," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 57-76.
    21. Simone Marinesi & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2018. "The Operational Advantages of Threshold Discounting Offers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2690-2708, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Yao & Chen, Rachel R. & Guan, Xu, 2021. "Daily-deal market with consumer retention: Price discrimination or quality differentiation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Yao Tang & Xu Guan, 2022. "Seller Organization and Percentage Fee Design in the Daily Deal Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1287-1302, December.
    3. Ioannis Stamatopoulos & Christos Tzamos, 2019. "Design and Dynamic Pricing of Vertically Differentiated Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4222-4241, September.
    4. Xiao Huang & Dan Zhang, 2020. "Service Product Design and Consumer Refund Policies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 366-381, March.
    5. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D. & Tirupati, Devanath & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Product line design and positioning using add-on services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 16-33.
    6. Xiao, Tiaojun & Xu, Tiantian, 2014. "Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 305-315.
    7. Zhang, Yu & Huang, Min & Tian, Lin & Cai, Gangshu George & Jin, Delong & Fan, Zhiping, 2023. "Manufacturer’s product line selling strategy and add-on policy in product sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1332-1343.
    8. Yunchuan Liu & Tony Haitao Cui, 2010. "The Length of Product Line in Distribution Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 474-482, 05-06.
    9. Yan, Xiaoming & Zhao, Wenhan & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Optimal product line design with reference price effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1045-1062.
    10. Kinshuk Jerath & Sang-Hyun Kim & Robert Swinney, 2017. "Product Quality in a Distribution Channel with Inventory Risk," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 747-761, September.
    11. Terrence August & Duy Dao & Kihoon Kim, 2019. "Market Segmentation and Software Security: Pricing Patching Rights," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4575-4597, October.
    12. Wong, Hartanto & Kim, Kilsun & Chhajed, Dilip, 2021. "Reducing channel inefficiency in product line design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Serguei Netessine & Terry A. Taylor, 2007. "Product Line Design and Production Technology," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 101-117, 01-02.
    14. Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & Feng, Guangqi & Yi, Zelong & Lu, Weida, 2022. "Raising funds through crowdfunding for a capital-constrained servicing manufacturer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Wenbo Cai & Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "Channel management and product design with consumers’ probabilistic choices," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 904-923, February.
    16. Tao Lu & Ying-Ju Chen & Jan C. Fransoo & Chung-Yee Lee, 2020. "Shipping to Heterogeneous Customers with Competing Carriers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 850-867, July.
    17. Anderson, Simon P. & Celik, Levent, 2015. "Product line design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 517-526.
    18. Bing Jing, 2006. "On the Profitability of Firms in a Differentiated Industry," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 248-259, 05-06.
    19. Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2018. "The impacts of public sustainability concerns on length of product line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 16-23.
    20. Maher Agi & Xinghao Yan, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," Post-Print hal-02898158, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09519-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.