IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v42y2019i11d10.1007_s40264-019-00848-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia McGettigan

    (Queen Mary University of London)

  • Carla Alonso Olmo

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Kelly Plueschke

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Mireia Castillon

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Daniel Nogueras Zondag

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Priya Bahri

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Xavier Kurz

    (European Medicines Agency)

  • Peter G. M. Mol

    (University of Groningen
    Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board)

Abstract

Introduction Patient registries, ‘organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time’, are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiative-led multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia McGettigan & Carla Alonso Olmo & Kelly Plueschke & Mireia Castillon & Daniel Nogueras Zondag & Priya Bahri & Xavier Kurz & Peter G. M. Mol, 2019. "Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(11), pages 1343-1351, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00848-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rita Francisco & Sandra Brasil & Carlota Pascoal & Andrew C. Edmondson & Jaak Jaeken & Paula A. Videira & Cláudia de Freitas & Vanessa dos Reis Ferreira & Dorinda Marques-da-Silva, 2022. "A Community-Led Approach as a Guide to Overcome Challenges for Therapy Research in Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Ravi Jandhyala, 2019. "Comment on: “Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation: Operational Proposals for Increasing the Use of Patient Registries in Regulatory Assessments”," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(12), pages 1515-1516, December.
    3. Kamila Sienkiewicz & Monika Burzyńska & Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska & Jacek Sienkiewicz & Ewelina Gaszyńska, 2021. "The Importance of Direct Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Safety Monitoring Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Patricia McGettigan & Carla Alonso Olmo & Kelly Plueschke & Mireia Castillon & Daniel Zondag & Priya Bahri & Xavier Kurz & Peter G. M. Mol, 2019. "Authors’ Reply to Ravi Jandhyala’s Comment on “Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation: Operational Proposals for Increasing the Use of Patient Registries in Regulatory Asse," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(12), pages 1517-1518, December.
    5. Emanuel Raschi & Matteo Bianchin & Milo Gatti & Alessandro Squizzato & Fabrizio De Ponti, 2019. "Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Overview of Systematic Reviews," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 42(12), pages 1409-1422, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:drugsa:v:42:y:2019:i:11:d:10.1007_s40264-019-00848-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40264 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.