IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/demogr/v37y2000i3p285-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial differences in birth health risk: A quantitative genetic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin Oord
  • David Rowe

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin Oord & David Rowe, 2000. "Racial differences in birth health risk: A quantitative genetic approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(3), pages 285-298, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:285-298
    DOI: 10.2307/2648042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2648042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2648042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Kallan, 1993. "Race, intervening variables, and two components of low birth weight," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 30(3), pages 489-506, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reanne Frank, 2001. "The misuse of biology in demographic research on racial/ethnic differences: A reply to van den oord and rowe," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(4), pages 563-567, November.
    2. Voigt, Manfred & Heineck, Guido & Hesse, Volker, 2004. "The relationship between maternal characteristics, birth weight and pre-term delivery: evidence from Germany at the end of the 20th century," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 265-280, June.
    3. Tukufu Zuberi, 2001. "One step back in understanding racial differences in birth weight," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(4), pages 569-571, November.
    4. Jason Boardman & Benjamin Domingue & Casey Blalock & Brett Haberstick & Kathleen Harris & Matthew McQueen, 2014. "Is the Gene-Environment Interaction Paradigm Relevant to Genome-Wide Studies? The Case of Education and Body Mass Index," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(1), pages 119-139, February.
    5. Edwin Oord & David Rowe, 2001. "A step in another direction: Looking for maternal genetic and environmental effects on racial differences in birth weight," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(4), pages 573-576, November.
    6. Timothy Gage & Fu Fang & Erin O’Neill & Greg DiRienzo, 2013. "Maternal Education, Birth Weight, and Infant Mortality in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 615-635, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jitka Rychtaříková & George J. Demko, 2001. "Inequalities in Infant Survival: An Analysis of Czech Linked Records," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 323-342, December.
    2. Conley, Dalton & Strully, Kate W. & Bennett, Neil G., 2006. "Twin differences in birth weight: The effects of genotype and prenatal environment on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 151-183, June.
    3. Padilla, Yolanda C. & Reichman, Nancy E., 2001. "Low birthweight: Do unwed fathers help?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4-5), pages 427-452.
    4. Daniel A. Powers & W. Parker Frisbie & Robert A. Hummer & Starling G. Pullum & Patricio Solis, 2006. "Race/Ethnic differences and age-variation in the effects of birth outcomes on infant mortality in the U.S," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 14(10), pages 179-216.
    5. W. Frisbie & Douglas Forbes & Robert Hummer & Starling Pullum, 1998. "Birth outcome, not pregnancy process: Reply to van der Veen," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 35(4), pages 519-527, November.
    6. Willem Veen, 1998. "Comment on “compromised birth outcomes and infant mortality among racial and ethnic groups”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 35(4), pages 509-517, November.
    7. Patricio Solís & Starling G. Pullum & W. Frisbie, 2000. "Demographic models of birth outcomes and infant mortality: An alternative measurement approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(4), pages 489-498, November.
    8. Hideko Matsuo, 2006. "The Postponement of Motherhood and its Child Health Consequences: Birth Weight and Weight Gain during the First Year of Life," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 4(1), pages 91-114.
    9. W. Frisbie & Seung-eun Song & Daniel Powers & Julie Street, 2004. "The increasing racial disparity in infant mortality: Respiratory distress syndrome and other causes," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 41(4), pages 773-800, November.
    10. Jason Boardman & Daniel Powers & Yolanda Padilla & Robert Hummer, 2002. "Low birth weight, social factors, and developmental outcomes among children in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(2), pages 353-368, May.
    11. W. Frisbie & Douglas Forbes & Starling Pullum, 1996. "Compromised birth outcomes and infant mortality among racial and ethnic groups," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 33(4), pages 469-481, November.
    12. Timothy Gage & Fu Fang & Erin O’Neill & Greg DiRienzo, 2013. "Maternal Education, Birth Weight, and Infant Mortality in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 615-635, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:285-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.