IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/demogr/v12y1975i4p573-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The yield of the imperfect: The 1970 national fertility study

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Westoff

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Westoff, 1975. "The yield of the imperfect: The 1970 national fertility study," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 12(4), pages 573-580, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:12:y:1975:i:4:p:573-580
    DOI: 10.2307/2060714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2060714
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2060714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry Bumpass & Harriet Presser, 1972. "Contraceptive sterilization in the U. S.: 1965 and 1970," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 9(4), pages 531-548, November.
    2. Ronald Rindfuss & Charles Westoff, 1974. "The initiation of contraception," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(1), pages 75-87, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evelyn Kitagawa, 1977. "On Mortallty," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 14(4), pages 381-389, November.
    2. William Mosher & David Johnson & Marjorie Horn, 1986. "Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and hispanic origin," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 23(3), pages 367-379, August.
    3. Martha J. Bailey & Melanie Guldi & Brad J. Hershbein, 2014. "Is There a Case for a "Second Demographic Transition?" Three Distinctive Features of the Post-1960 Fertility Decline," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Leah Boustan & Carola Frydman & Robert Margo (ed.),Human Capital in History: The American Record, pages 273-312, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    4. Michael Hout, 1977. "Family planning program activity and patient enrollment rates in the United States, 1969 and 1971," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 14(2), pages 213-222, May.
    5. Martha J. Bailey & Jason M. Lindo, 2017. "Access and Use of Contraception and Its Effects on Women’s Outcomes in the U.S," NBER Working Papers 23465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karl Bauman & J. Udry, 1973. "The difference in unwanted births between blacks and whites," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 10(3), pages 315-328, August.
    2. Elizabeth Thomson, 1997. "Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 34(3), pages 343-354, August.
    3. C. Swicegood & S. Morgan & Ronald Rindfuss, 1984. "Measurement and Replication: Evaluating the Consistency of Eight U. S. Fertility Surveys," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 21(1), pages 19-33, February.
    4. Barbara Janowitz, 1976. "An analysis of the impact of education on family size," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(2), pages 189-198, May.
    5. Bryan Boulier & Mark Rosenzweig, 1978. "Age, biological factors, and socioeconomic determinants of fertility: A new measure of cumulative fertility for use in the empirical analysis of family size," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(4), pages 487-497, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:12:y:1975:i:4:p:573-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.