IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v90y2025i3d10.1007_s10589-024-00646-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Douglas–Rachford splitting method through the lenses of Moreau-type envelopes

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Atenas

    (The University of Melbourne)

Abstract

We analyze the Douglas–Rachford splitting method for weakly convex optimization problems, by the token of the Douglas–Rachford envelope, a merit function akin to the Moreau envelope. First, we use epi-convergence techniques to show that this artifact approximates the original objective function via epigraphs. Secondly, we present how global convergence and local linear convergence rates for Douglas–Rachford splitting can be obtained using such envelope, under mild regularity assumptions. The keystone of the convergence analysis is the fact that the Douglas–Rachford envelope satisfies a sufficient descent inequality alongside the generated sequence, a feature that allows us to use arguments usually employed for descent methods. We report numerical experiments that use weakly convex penalty functions, which are comparable with the known behavior of the method in the convex case.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Atenas, 2025. "Understanding the Douglas–Rachford splitting method through the lenses of Moreau-type envelopes," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 881-910, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:90:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00646-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-024-00646-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-024-00646-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-024-00646-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:90:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-024-00646-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.