IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i3d10.1007_s00180-020-00997-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for continuous distributions against a known alternative

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Rolke

    (University of Puerto Rico)

  • Cristian Gutierrez Gongora

    (University of Puerto Rico)

Abstract

The chi square goodness-of-fit test is among the oldest known statistical tests, first proposed by Pearson in 1900 for the multinomial distribution. It has been in use in many fields ever since. However, various studies have shown that when applied to data from a continuous distribution it is generally inferior to other methods such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Anderson-Darling tests. However, the performance, that is the power, of the chi square test depends crucially on the way the data is binned. In this paper we describe a method that automatically finds a binning that is very good against a specific alternative. We show that then the chi square test is generally competitive and sometimes even superior to other standard tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Rolke & Cristian Gutierrez Gongora, 2021. "A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for continuous distributions against a known alternative," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1885-1900, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-020-00997-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-00997-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-020-00997-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-020-00997-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Zhang, 2002. "Powerful goodness‐of‐fit tests based on the likelihood ratio," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 281-294, May.
    2. J. Oosterhoff, 1985. "The Choice Of Cells In Chi–Square Tests," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 39(2), pages 115-128, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vexler, Albert & Gurevich, Gregory, 2010. "Empirical likelihood ratios applied to goodness-of-fit tests based on sample entropy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 531-545, February.
    2. Meintanis, S.G. & Milošević, B. & Jiménez–Gamero, M.D., 2024. "Goodness–of–fit tests based on the min–characteristic function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. L. Ndwandwe & J. S. Allison & L. Santana & I. J. H. Visagie, 2023. "Testing for the Pareto type I distribution: a comparative study," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(2), pages 215-256, August.
    4. Zhang, Jin & Wu, Yuehua, 2007. "k-Sample tests based on the likelihood ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4682-4691, May.
    5. J. I. Beltrán-Beltrán & F. J. O’Reilly, 2019. "On goodness of fit tests for the Poisson, negative binomial and binomial distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Jesse Frey, 2008. "An exact distribution-free one-sample test for equivalence," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 739-750.
    7. Coin, Daniele, 2008. "A goodness-of-fit test for normality based on polynomial regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2185-2198, January.
    8. J. S. Allison & L. Santana & N. Smit & I. J. H. Visagie, 2017. "An ‘apples to apples’ comparison of various tests for exponentiality," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1241-1283, December.
    9. Jingjing Qu & Hon Keung Tony Ng & Chul Moon, 2024. "Empirical likelihood ratio tests for homogeneity of component lifetime distributions based on system lifetime data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 3007-3029, September.
    10. Lykou, R. & Tsaklidis, G. & Papadimitriou, E., 2020. "Change point analysis on the Corinth Gulf (Greece) seismicity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    11. M. Cockeran & S. G. Meintanis & L. Santana & J. S. Allison, 2021. "Goodness-of-fit testing of survival models in the presence of Type–II right censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 977-1010, June.
    12. Zhang, Jin & Wu, Yuehua, 2005. "Likelihood-ratio tests for normality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 709-721, June.
    13. Xu, Xingzhong & Ding, Xiaobo & Zhao, Shuran, 2009. "New goodness-of-fit tests based on fiducial empirical distribution function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1132-1141, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-020-00997-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.