IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v33y2018i3d10.1007_s00180-017-0758-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of component reliability test plan for a series system having time dependent testing cost with the presence of covariates

Author

Listed:
  • M. Kumar

    (National Institute of Technology Calicut)

  • P. N. Bajeel

    (National Institute of Technology Calicut)

Abstract

Consider a series system with n different components. Assume that the lifetime of $$i\text {-}th$$ i - t h component follows exponential distribution with parameter $$ \lambda _{i}(\mathbf {x}), \ \mathbf {x} \in \mathbb {R}^{k} $$ λ i ( x ) , x ∈ R k is a covariate vector, $$ 1\le i \le n $$ 1 ≤ i ≤ n . For example, $$ \mathbf {x} $$ x may be (temperature, pressure, humidity), so that $$ \mathbf {x} \in \mathbb {R}^{3} $$ x ∈ R 3 represents a three dimensional covariate vector. Assume that each $$ \lambda _{i}(\mathbf {x}),1\le i \le n $$ λ i ( x ) , 1 ≤ i ≤ n , is distinct and depends upon $$ \mathbf {x} $$ x through linear relationship. Prior information available in the form of upper bounds on $$ \lambda _{i}(\mathbf {x}) $$ λ i ( x ) are also incorporated in the design. We propose to obtain optimal reliability test plan based on maximum likelihood estimator of system reliability. A non-linear integer optimization problem is formulated for minimizing the maximum of total expected cost involved in testing satisfying usual probability requirements (Type-I and Type-II error constraints). In addition, it is also established through simulation that the derived sampling plan meets the specified producer’s and consumer’s risks as well. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to study the effect of various input parameters on maximum total expected testing cost. Finally, a qualitative analysis is presented at the end to discuss the nature of sampling plan derived. Several numerical examples are discussed to illustrate our test plan, and it is observed that the proposed plan has significant potential to reduce the total number of components to be tested for failure. It is noted that the number of components to be tested for failure is reduced by about 96% as compared to the existing test plans in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Kumar & P. N. Bajeel, 2018. "Design of component reliability test plan for a series system having time dependent testing cost with the presence of covariates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1267-1292, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0758-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0758-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0758-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-017-0758-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuban Altinel, Ismail, 1994. "The design of optimum component test plans in the demonstration of system reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 318-333, November.
    2. Jayant Rajgopal & Mainak Mazumdar, 1997. "Minimum cost component test plans for evaluating reliability of a highly reliable parallel system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(5), pages 401-418, August.
    3. I. Kuban Altinel & Süleyman Özekici, 1997. "A dynamic model for component testing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 187-197, March.
    4. Kuban Altinel, I. & Ozekici, Suleyman, 1998. "Optimum component test plans for systems with dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 175-186, November.
    5. Altmel, Ismail Kuban, 1992. "The design of optimum component test plans in the demonstration of a series system reliability," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 281-292, October.
    6. Shmuel Gal, 1974. "Optimal Test Design for Reliability Demonstration," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1236-1242, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khalil, Y.F., 2019. "New statistical formulations for determination of qualification test plans of safety instrumented systems (SIS) subject to low/high operational demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 196-209.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabnis S. V. & Agnihothram G., 2007. "Reliability Test Plans for Series Systems in the Presence of Covariates," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 197-209, January.
    2. Sabnis S. V. & Agnihothram G., 2006. "Application of Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality for Construction of Reliability Test Plan for Parallel Systems in the Presence of Covariates," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 219-230, January.
    3. Kuban Altinel, I. & Ozekici, Suleyman, 1998. "Optimum component test plans for systems with dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 175-186, November.
    4. Fernández, Arturo J., 2015. "Optimum attributes component test plans for k-out-of-n:F Weibull systems using prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 688-696.
    5. I. Kuban Altinel & Süleyman Özekici, 1997. "A dynamic model for component testing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 187-197, March.
    6. Khalil, Y.F., 2019. "New statistical formulations for determination of qualification test plans of safety instrumented systems (SIS) subject to low/high operational demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 196-209.
    7. Zhu, Mixin & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2024. "Maintenance modeling of serial-parallel multi-station manufacturing system with failure-induced damage and assembly parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. Feyzioglu, Orhan & Kuban Altinel, I. & Ozekici, Suleyman, 2006. "The design of optimum component test plans for system reliability," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 3099-3112, July.
    9. Feyzioglu, Orhan & Altinel, I. Kuban & Ozekici, Suleyman, 2008. "Optimum component test plans for phased-mission systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 255-265, February.
    10. İ. Altınel & Bora Çekyay & Orhan Feyzioğlu & M. Keskin & Süleyman Özekici, 2011. "Mission-Based Component Testing for Series Systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Qianru Ge & Willem van Jaarsveld & Zümbül Atan, 2020. "Optimal redesign decisions through failure rate estimates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 254-271, June.
    12. Jayant Rajgopal & Mainak Mazumdar, 1997. "Minimum cost component test plans for evaluating reliability of a highly reliable parallel system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(5), pages 401-418, August.
    13. P. Vellaisamy & S. Sankar, 2002. "Two‐stage component test plans for testing the reliability of a series system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 95-116, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0758-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.