IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v27y2021i2d10.1007_s10588-021-09329-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The coronavirus is a bioweapon”: classifying coronavirus stories on fact-checking sites

Author

Listed:
  • Lynnette Hui Xian Ng

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Kathleen M. Carley

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

Abstract

The 2020 coronavirus pandemic has heightened the need to flag coronavirus-related misinformation, and fact-checking groups have taken to verifying misinformation on the Internet. We explore stories reported by fact-checking groups PolitiFact, Poynter and Snopes from January to June 2020. We characterise these stories into six clusters, then analyse temporal trends of story validity and the level of agreement across sites. The sites present the same stories 78% of the time, with the highest agreement between Poynter and PolitiFact. We further break down the story clusters into more granular story types by proposing a unique automated method, which can be used to classify diverse story sources in both fact-checked stories and tweets. Our results show story type classification performs best when trained on the same medium, with contextualised BERT vector representations outperforming a Bag-Of-Words classifier.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynnette Hui Xian Ng & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "“The coronavirus is a bioweapon”: classifying coronavirus stories on fact-checking sites," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 179-194, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:27:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09329-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-021-09329-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-021-09329-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-021-09329-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen M. Carley, 2020. "Social cybersecurity: an emerging science," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 365-381, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Staszak & Julia Maciejowska & Wiktoria Urjasz & Tomasz Misiuro & Andrzej Cudo, 2022. "The Relationship between the Need for Closure and Coronavirus Fear: The Mediating Effect of Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lynnette Hui Xian Ng & Iain J. Cruickshank & Kathleen M. Carley, 2023. "Coordinating Narratives Framework for cross-platform analysis in the 2021 US Capitol riots," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 470-486, September.
    2. Vibha Sharma & Fatema Sultana & Sohaib Alam & Sameena Banu, 2024. "Trolling as a Disruptive Tool for Human Rights Violations: An Exploration of the Challenges Faced by Performance Artists," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(4), pages 411-411, July.
    3. Elie Alhajjar & Taylor Bradley, 2022. "Survival analysis for insider threat," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 335-351, December.
    4. Joshua Uyheng & Lynnette Hui Xian Ng & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "Active, aggressive, but to little avail: characterizing bot activity during the 2020 Singaporean elections," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 324-342, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:27:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-021-09329-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.