IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v15y2009i2d10.1007_s10588-008-9052-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the evolution of social structure

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Edmonds

    (Manchester Metropolitan University)

  • Emma Norling

    (Manchester Metropolitan University)

  • David Hales

    (The University of Bologna)

Abstract

To what extent can social structure result from evolutionary processes as popposed to being deliberately organised? To begin to answer this questions five different but releated social simulations are reviewed, and a map of which mechanisms might results in what structures under what conditions being started. These show that different structures can be brought about by evolutionary processes based on the abilities and propensities of the individuals. The article ends with some challenges—to construct a credible simulations of more sophisticated structures: social group selection and self-organised value chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Edmonds & Emma Norling & David Hales, 2009. "Towards the evolution of social structure," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 78-94, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:15:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-008-9052-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-008-9052-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-008-9052-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-008-9052-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick L. Riolo & Michael D. Cohen & Robert Axelrod, 2001. "Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 441-443, November.
    2. Bruce Edmonds & David Hales, 2003. "Replication, Replication and Replication: Some Hard Lessons from Model Alignmen," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11.
    3. Bruce Edmonds, 2006. "The Emergence of Symbiotic Groups Resulting from Skill-Differentiation and Tags," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingguang Chen & Zhentao Zhu, 2019. "Interactional Effects Between Individual Heterogeneity and Collective Behavior in Complex Organizational Systems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 289-313, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Gareth Polhill & Dawn C. Parker & Daniel Brown & Volker Grimm, 2008. "Using the ODD Protocol for Describing Three Agent-Based Social Simulation Models of Land-Use Change," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(2), pages 1-3.
    2. Caterina Cruciani & Anna Moretti & Paolo Pellizzari, 2012. "Does sharing values lead to cooperation? A similarity-based investigation," Working Papers 1, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    3. José Manuel Galán & Luis R. Izquierdo & Segismundo S. Izquierdo & José Ignacio Santos & Ricardo del Olmo & Adolfo López-Paredes & Bruce Edmonds, 2009. "Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1.
    4. Marco A. Janssen, 2009. "Understanding Artificial Anasazi," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13.
    5. Caterina Cruciani & Anna Moretti & Paolo Pellizzari, 2017. "Dynamic patterns in similarity-based cooperation: an agent-based investigation," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(1), pages 121-141, April.
    6. Happe, K. & Kellermann, K., 2008. "Diese Modelle sind zu komplex! – oder doch nicht?: Experimentelles Design und Metamodellierung als möglicher Weg, das Kommunikationsproblem agentenbasierter Modelle in der Politikanalyse zu lösen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    7. Cohen, Michael D. & Axelrod, Robert & Riolo, Rick, 2004. "Must there be human genes specific to prosocial behavior?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 49-51, January.
    8. Bowling Jeremy, 2017. "International Cooperation: Testing Evolution of Cooperation Theories," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 1-35, January.
    9. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    10. Tetsushi Ohdaira & Takao Terano, 2011. "Scale-Free Relationships Facilitate Cooperation in Spatial Games with Sequential Strategy," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14(3), pages 1-3.
    11. Dimitris Iliopoulos & Arend Hintze & Christoph Adami, 2010. "Critical Dynamics in the Evolution of Stochastic Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    12. J. Gareth Polhill & Bruce Edmonds, 2007. "Open Access for Social Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10.
    13. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Robert Axtell, 2007. "What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 105-122, September.
    15. Mayuko Nakamaru & Akira Yokoyama, 2014. "The Effect of Ostracism and Optional Participation on the Evolution of Cooperation in the Voluntary Public Goods Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    16. Happe, Kathrin & Kellermann, Konrad, 2007. "DIESE MODELLE SIND ZU KOMPLEX!-ODER DOCH NICHT?: EXPERIMENTELLES DESIGN UND METAMODELLIERUNG ALS MOGLICHER WEG, DAS KOMMUNIKATIONSPROBLEM AGENTENBASIERTER MODELLE IN DER POLITIKANALYSE ZU LOSEN (Germa," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7613, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    17. Yutaka Nakai, 2014. "In-group favoritism due to friend selection strategies based on fixed tag and within-group reputation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 320-354, August.
    18. Julian Zappala & Brian Logan, 2010. "Effects of resource availability on consensus decision making in primates," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 400-415, December.
    19. Nathan Berg & Jeong-Yoo Kim & Kyu Min Lee, 2021. "Why is parochialism prevalent?: an evolutionary approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(4), pages 769-796, October.
    20. Peter Andras & John Lazarus & Gilbert Roberts & Steven J Lynden, 2005. "Uncertainty and Cooperation: Analytical Results and a Simulated Agent Society," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:15:y:2009:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-008-9052-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.