IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v4y2024i4d10.1007_s43615-024-00402-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy for Circularity Enhancement in Bioeconomy Sector: A Case Study from Biogas Sector of Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Navin Kumar Jha

    (Tribhuvan University
    Kathmandu University)

  • Brijesh Mainali

    (Linnaeus University)

  • Sunil Prasad Lohani

    (Kathmandu University)

Abstract

The circular bioeconomy (CBE) aims to enhance the value of renewable biowaste by recovering resources, and the biogas sector, in particular, is a promising area within CBE. Despite the availability of diverse waste types, developing countries have mainly focused on circulating domestic waste. This study aims to formulate a strategy to enhance Nepal’s biogas-based circular bioeconomy (BGCBE) using the widely employed PEST-SWOT methodology. The biogas sector was analyzed from political, economic, social, and technical (PEST) perspectives, drawing from relevant literature, primary and secondary data, and international practices observed within the BGCBE. Key drivers and barriers in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) were identified to enhance circularity within the sector. Key drivers supporting the BGCBE include a state-sponsored regulatory body promoting the biogas sector through financial incentives, the availability of various waste resources, and the involvement of local elected bodies as facilitators for municipal solid waste (MSW)-based biogas plants. However, several barriers were identified, such as a lack of community awareness about the importance of waste segregation and the environmental benefits of BGCBE, limited technical skills among household biodigester (HBD) users, the unavailability of technically skilled manpower, and the underutilization of waste resources for valorization. Stakeholder perspectives were integrated to validate the SWOT analysis and develop comprehensive strategies. Key proposed strategies include incentivizing bio-based product competitiveness through premium pricing policies, extending carbon trading opportunities, and raising community awareness about the ecological benefits of waste-based products. Policy interventions such as mobilizing unused waste resources, strategically locating biogas plants, and fostering stakeholder collaboration are recommended to advance the BGCBE in Nepal.

Suggested Citation

  • Navin Kumar Jha & Brijesh Mainali & Sunil Prasad Lohani, 2024. "Strategy for Circularity Enhancement in Bioeconomy Sector: A Case Study from Biogas Sector of Nepal," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 2531-2557, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00402-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-024-00402-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-024-00402-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-024-00402-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lis J. Suarez-Visbal & Jesús Rosales Carreón & Blanca Corona & Ernst Worrell, 2023. "Correction to: The Social Impacts of Circular Strategies in the Apparel Value Chain; a Comparative Study Between Three Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1155-1155, June.
    2. Lis J. Suarez-Visbal & Jesús Rosales Carreón & Blanca Corona & Ernst Worrell, 2023. "The Social Impacts of Circular Strategies in the Apparel Value Chain; a Comparative Study Between Three Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 757-790, June.
    3. Davide Viaggi & Matteo Zavalloni, 2021. "Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: Implications for Economic Evaluation in the Post-COVID Era," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1257-1269, December.
    4. Dhakal, Shobhakar & Raut, Anil K., 2010. "Potential and bottlenecks of the carbon market: The case of a developing country, Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3781-3789, July.
    5. Kala, Kaveri & Bolia, Nomesh B. & Sushil,, 2020. "Waste management communication policy for effective citizen awareness," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 661-678.
    6. Wisdom Kanda & Martin Geissdoerfer & Olof Hjelm, 2021. "From circular business models to circular business ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2814-2829, September.
    7. Skovsgaard, Lise & Jensen, Ida Græsted, 2018. "Recent trends in biogas value chains explained using cooperative game theory," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 503-522.
    8. Li, Zifu & Yin, Fubin & Li, Haoyuan & Wang, Xiaoxi & Lian, Jing, 2013. "A novel test method for evaluating the methane gas permeability of biogas storage membrane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 572-577.
    9. Giampietro, Mario, 2019. "On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 143-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Lang & Giulia Minnucci & Matthias Mueller & Michael P. Schlaile, 2023. "The Role of Consumers in Business Model Innovations for a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Grouiez, Pascal & Debref, Romain & Vivien, Franck-Dominique & Befort, Nicolas, 2023. "The complex relationships between non-food agriculture and the sustainable bioeconomy: The French case," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Suzana Matoh & Sally V. Russell & Katy Roelich & Sally Randles, 2024. "Circular business model innovation and cognitive framing: Addressing the “missing micro”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8656-8667, December.
    6. Thapa, Samir & Morrison, Mark & Parton, Kevin A, 2021. "Willingness to pay for domestic biogas plants and distributing carbon revenues to influence their purchase: A case study in Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Jun Hou & Weifeng Zhang & Pei Wang & Zhengxia Dou & Liwei Gao & David Styles, 2017. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation of Rural Household Biogas Systems in China: A Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Carlos Humberto González Escobar & Juan Carlos Granobles Torres & Abel Osvaldo Villa Rodríguez, 2024. "A Critical Analysis of the Dynamics of Stakeholders for Bioeconomy Innovation: The Case of Caldas, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Luca Fraccascia & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Abhishek Agarwal & Erik G. Hansen, 2021. "Business models for the circular economy: Empirical advances and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2741-2744, September.
    11. Kęstutis Venslauskas & Kęstutis Navickas & Marja Nappa & Petteri Kangas & Revilija Mozūraitytė & Rasa Šližytė & Vidmantas Župerka, 2021. "Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Angélica Ochoa-Díaz, 2022. "What Are the Topics That Business Ecosystems Navigate? Updating of Scientific Activity and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Thayla Zomer & Tim McAloone & Daniela Pigosso, 2024. "Categorization of manufacturing companies’ readiness profiles for the transition to the circular economy: A multidimensional cluster analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 277-288, April.
    14. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura À. & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2022. "Factors and actions for the sustainability of the residential sector. The nexus of energy, materials, space, and time use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Benoit Mougenot & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin, 2022. "Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1031-1047, January.
    18. Yadira Mori Clement & Birgit Bednar-Friedl, 2017. "Do Clean Development Mechanism projects generate local employment? Testing for sectoral effects across Brazilian municipalities," Graz Economics Papers 2017-05, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    19. Aliyu, Abubakar Sadiq & Dada, Joseph O. & Adam, Ibrahim Khalil, 2015. "Current status and future prospects of renewable energy in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 336-346.
    20. Qinglan Liu & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Miying Yang & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: Digital functions and mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2171-2192, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00402-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.