IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/circec/v2y2022i4d10.1007_s43615-022-00160-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity and Sustainability Indicators—Part II: Experimentations

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Saidani

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Université Paris-Saclay)

  • François Cluzel

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Yann Leroy

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Daniela Pigosso

    (Technical University of Denmark)

  • Mariia Kravchenko

    (Technical University of Denmark)

  • Harrison Kim

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

Considering the growing number of metrics and indicators to assess the circular economy transition, it is paramount to shed light on how they complement and differ from traditional approaches, such as life cycle assessment or sustainability performance indicators. This study provides new empirical insights on the correlation between life cycle assessment, circularity, and sustainability indicator-based approaches to design circular and sustainable products. Specifically, the importance lies in analyzing how the results generated by these different approaches can be used to support the design of products that are not only circular but also sustainable. A practice-based project, involving over 175 engineering students over two consecutive academic years, is conducted with the purpose of comparing and improving the circularity and sustainability performance of three product alternatives of lawn mowing systems (gasoline, electric, autonomous). Notably, the following resources are deployed: 18 midpoints environmental indicators calculated by life cycle assessment, nine product circularity indicators, and numerous leading sustainability indicators. Critical analyses on the usability, time efficiency, scientific soundness, and robustness of each approach are drawn, combining quantitative results generated by each group with the feedback of future engineers. Last but not least, the developed workshop could be reused or adapted to train further the designers, engineers, and managers of tomorrow in deploying life cycle, circularity, and/or sustainability-indicator-based approaches to make more informed and sustainable decisions, e.g., between design trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Saidani & François Cluzel & Yann Leroy & Daniela Pigosso & Mariia Kravchenko & Harrison Kim, 2022. "Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity and Sustainability Indicators—Part II: Experimentations," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1399-1424, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-022-00160-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-022-00160-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-022-00160-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-022-00160-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgios Lanaras-Mamounis & Anastasios Kipritsis & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos Ι. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2022. "A Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Firms to Circular Economy: a Triple-Level Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 883-902, September.
    2. Mariana Oliveira & Mécia Miguel & Sven Kevin Langen & Amos Ncube & Amalia Zucaro & Gabriella Fiorentino & Renato Passaro & Remo Santagata & Nick Coleman & Benjamin H. Lowe & Sergio Ulgiati & Andrea Ge, 2021. "Circular Economy and the Transition to a Sustainable Society: Integrated Assessment Methods for a New Paradigm," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 99-113, June.
    3. Jeremy Faludi & Steven Hoffenson & Sze Yin Kwok & Michael Saidani & Sophie I. Hallstedt & Cassandra Telenko & Victor Martinez, 2020. "A Research Roadmap for Sustainable Design Methods and Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Mariia Kravchenko & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Tim C. McAloone, 2020. "A Procedure to Support Systematic Selection of Leading Indicators for Sustainability Performance Measurement of Circular Economy Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Saidani & Harrison Kim, 2022. "Nexus Between Life Cycle Assessment, Circularity, and Sustainability Indicators—Part I: a Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1143-1156, September.
    2. Seeram Ramakrishna & Wayne Hu & Rajan Jose, 2023. "Sustainability in Numbers by Data Analytics," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 643-655, June.
    3. Maione, A. & Massarotti, N. & Santagata, R. & Ulgiati, S. & Vanoli, L., 2023. "Integrated environmental accounting of a geothermal grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Dennis Vegter & Jos van Hillegersberg & Matthias Olthaar, 2021. "Performance Measurement Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: Current State of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mariia Kravchenko & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Tim C. McAloone, 2020. "A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Purvis, Ben & Genovese, Andrea, 2023. "Better or different? A reflection on the suitability of indicator methods for a just transition to a circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Parolin, Giácomo & McAloone, Tim C. & Pigosso, Daniela C.A., 2024. "How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Umberto Lucia & Debora Fino & Giulia Grisolia, 2022. "A thermoeconomic indicator for the sustainable development with social considerations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2022-2036, February.
    10. Marina I. Baumer-Cardoso & Weslynne S. Ashton & Lucila M. S. Campos, 2023. "Measuring the Adoption of Circular Economy in Manufacturing Companies: the Proposal of the Overall Circularity Effectiveness (OCE) Index," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 511-534, March.
    11. Anna M. Walker & Katelin Opferkuch & Erik Roos Lindgreen & Andrea Raggi & Alberto Simboli & Walter J.V. Vermeulen & Sandra Caeiro & Roberta Salomone, 2022. "What Is the Relation between Circular Economy and Sustainability? Answers from Frontrunner Companies Engaged with Circular Economy Practices," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 731-758, June.
    12. Eirini Kaminioti & Constantina Kottaridi & Claire Economidou, 2022. "Bioeconomy and Corporate GRI Reporting: a Case Study Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 383-399, March.
    13. Julie Kamp Albæk & Sasha Shahbazi & Tim C. McAloone & Daniela C. A. Pigosso, 2020. "Circularity Evaluation of Alternative Concepts During Early Product Design and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Patricia Lagun Mesquita & Merlina Missimer, 2021. "Social Sustainability Work in Product Development Organizations: An Empirical Study of Three Sweden-Based Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. S. Karagianni & M. Pempetzoglou, 2022. "The Income Distribution Impact of Decarbonization in Greece: an Initial Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 557-567, June.
    16. José Miguel Rodríguez-Antón & Luis Rubio-Andrada & María Soledad Celemín-Pedroche & Soraya María Ruíz-Peñalver, 2022. "From the circular economy to the sustainable development goals in the European Union: an empirical comparison," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 67-95, March.
    17. Svein Gunnar Kjøde & Maja van der Velden & Mahsa Motevallian, 2021. "Sustainability Concepts in Nordic Business Research: A Critical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Erik Roos Lindgreen & Katelin Opferkuch & Anna M. Walker & Roberta Salomone & Tatiana Reyes & Andrea Raggi & Alberto Simboli & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Sandra Caeiro, 2022. "Exploring assessment practices of companies actively engaged with circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1414-1438, May.
    19. Pinaki Dasgupta & Vivek Kumar & Anushree Malik & Madan Kumar, 2023. "Wastewater Treatment Systems for City-Based Municipal Drains for Achieving Sustainability," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 585-606, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-022-00160-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.