IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v28y2020i1d10.1007_s10100-018-0527-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing decisions in marketing channels in the presence of optional contingent products

Author

Listed:
  • Peter M. Kort

    (Tilburg University
    University of Antwerp)

  • Sihem Taboubi

    (GERAD, HEC Montréal)

  • Georges Zaccour

    (GERAD, HEC Montréal)

Abstract

The technological developments observed in the last two decades contributed to the digitalization of products and the introduction of various mobile devices designed for the consumption of this digital content. Many online retailers launched their own mobile devices, which had a direct effect on their multi-product pricing strategies, but also an effect on the other channel members’ pricing decisions (i.e., digital-content providers). In many industries, these developments resulted in switching from traditional wholesale pricing to Revenue-Sharing Contracts (RSC), involving a shift of control over retail prices in the channel, a situation that was not always easily accepted by channel members. We examine a manufacturer-retailer framework where the manufacturer sells a base product in two formats: a tangible product sold directly to consumers and a digital format sold via an online retailer. The latter also sells an optional contingent product, a device used to consume the digital product. We investigate two questions: The first one pertains to the contingent product’s impact on firms’ pricing strategies. The second question investigates whether the manufacturer is interested in the implementation of an RSC and then looks at whether this pricing model suits the retailer and consumers. Our main results are as follows: (1) The presence of the contingent product leads to a higher retail price for the digital base product and negatively affects the demand for the tangible product format. (2) The manufacturer is interested in an RSC only if it receives a sufficiently large part of the digital-product revenue, but the retailer is almost always interested by this pricing model. (3) The double marginalization effect could benefit the manufacturer.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter M. Kort & Sihem Taboubi & Georges Zaccour, 2020. "Pricing decisions in marketing channels in the presence of optional contingent products," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 167-192, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:28:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0527-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-018-0527-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-018-0527-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-018-0527-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Strategic Decentralization in Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 335-355.
    2. Dantas, Danilo C. & Taboubi, Sihem & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "Which business model for e-book pricing?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 126-129.
    3. Gangshu (George) Cai & Yue Dai & Sean X. Zhou, 2012. "Exclusive Channels and Revenue Sharing in a Complementary Goods Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 172-187, January.
    4. Grewal, Dhruv & Janakiraman, Ramkumar & Kalyanam, Kirthi & Kannan, P.K. & Ratchford, Brian & Song, Reo & Tolerico, Stephen, 2010. "Strategic Online and Offline Retail Pricing: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 138-154.
    5. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    6. Ingene, Charles A. & Taboubi, Sihem & Zaccour, Georges, 2012. "Game-Theoretic Coordination Mechanisms in Distribution Channels: Integration and Extensions for Models Without Competition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 476-496.
    7. Peter M. Noble & Thomas S. Gruca, 1999. "Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 435-454.
    8. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    9. Peter M. Noble & Thomas S. Gruca, 1999. "Response to the Comments on “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 458-459.
    10. Lingxiu Dong & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Kaijie Zhu, 2009. "Product Line Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1704-1717, October.
    11. Yunzeng Wang, 2006. "Joint Pricing-Production Decisions in Supply Chains of Complementary Products with Uncertain Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1110-1127, December.
    12. P. K. Kannan & Barbara Kline Pope & Sanjay Jain, 2009. "—Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 620-636, 07-08.
    13. Gaudin, Germain & White, Alexander, 2014. "On the antitrust economics of the electronic books industry," DICE Discussion Papers 147 [rev.], Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Zhang & Sisi Ju & Hongfu Huang, 2022. "Can a Restaurant Benefit from Joining an Online Take-Out Platform?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Yingge Zhang & Zhihu Xia & Yanni Li & Anmai Dai & Jie Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Digital Marketing Model of Geoenergy Resources under Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Shi-Woei Lin & Januardi Januardi, 2023. "Two-period pricing and utilization decisions in a dual-channel service-only supply chain," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 605-635, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kittaka, Yuta & Matsushima, Noriaki & Saruta, Fuyuki, 2022. "Negative effect of price-matching policy on traditional retailers in a dual-channel supply chain with different content formats," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Cruijssen, F. & Borm, P.E.M. & Fleuren, H.A. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2005. "Insinking : A Methodology to Exploit Synergy in Transportation," Other publications TiSEM 958be918-e7b4-4e46-9cbe-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    4. Yang, Shilei & Shi, Victor & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2015. "Manufacturers׳ channel structures when selling asymmetric competing products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 641-651.
    5. Xiaojing Li & Xingzheng Ai, 2021. "A choice of selling format in the online marketplace with cross-sales supply chain: Platform selling or traditional reselling?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 393-422, June.
    6. Yun Fong Lim & Yunzeng Wang & Yue Wu, 2015. "Consignment Contracts with Revenue Sharing for a Capacitated Retailer and Multiple Manufacturers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 527-537, October.
    7. Hu, Benyong & Xu, Dong & Meng, Chao, 2017. "Inconsistency of a retailer's optimal policies and channel performance under revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 53-65.
    8. Cruijssen, F., 2006. "Horizontal cooperation in transport and logistics," Other publications TiSEM ab6dbe68-aebc-4b03-8eea-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Cruijssen, Frans & Borm, Peter & Fleuren, Hein & Hamers, Herbert, 2010. "Supplier-initiated outsourcing: A methodology to exploit synergy in transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 763-774, December.
    10. Yao, Fanjun & Parilina, Elena & Zaccour, Georges & Gao, Hongwei, 2022. "Accounting for consumers’ environmental concern in supply chain contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 987-1006.
    11. Honggang Hu & Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2022. "Agency or Wholesale? The Role of Retail Pass-Through," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7538-7554, October.
    12. Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Channel efficiency and retailer tier dominance in a supply chain with a common manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 100-121.
    13. Yuta Kittaka & Noriaki Matsushima & Fuyuki Saruta, 2021. "Competition between physical and electronic content retailers," ISER Discussion Paper 1123, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    14. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & Kyung Sung Jung & Young Kwark & Jingchuan Pu, 2023. "Impact of Own Brand Product Introduction on Optimal Pricing Models for Platform and Incumbent Sellers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1131-1147, September.
    15. Yuhong He & Shuya Yin, 2015. "Joint Selling of Complementary Components Under Brand and Retail Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 470-479, October.
    16. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2020. "The strategic analysis of logistics service sharing in an e-commerce platform," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Feng, Lipan & Jin, Minyue, 2022. "Platform vs. Manufacturer: Who should implement innovation in e-commerce supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Mai, Fengxia & Zhang, Jianxiong & Sun, Xiaojie, 2021. "Dynamic analysis of pricing model in a book supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    19. Niu, Baozhuang & Yu, Xinhu & Li, Qiyang & Wang, Yulan, 2023. "Gains and Losses of Key Opinion Leaders’ Product Promotion in Livestream E-commerce," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Pietro De Giovanni, 2016. "Coordination in a distribution channel with decisions on the nature of incentives and share-dependency on pricing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(8), pages 1034-1049, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:28:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0527-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.