IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/busres/v12y2019i2d10.1007_s40685-018-0071-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing IT availability risks in smart factory networks

Author

Listed:
  • Björn Häckel

    (University of Applied Sciences Augsburg
    Project Group Business and Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT)

  • Florian Hänsch

    (Finalix Business Consulting)

  • Michael Hertel

    (BMW Financial Services)

  • Jochen Übelhör

    (Project Group Business and Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT
    University of Augsburg)

Abstract

Emerging smart manufacturing technologies combine physical production networks with digital IT systems, resulting in complex smart factory networks, which are especially vulnerable to IT security risks, such as IT component non-availabilities. Companies must employ extensive IT security measures to secure their production facilities. However, complex network structures and inherent dependencies of smart factory networks complicate corresponding investment decisions and increase the need for appropriate decision support. We develop a risk assessment model that supports companies in the investment decision-making process regarding IT security measures by identifying and evaluating the most critical areas of the information network while considering the underlying production network. For this purpose, IT availability risks are quantified by means of graph theory, matrix notation, and value-at-risk. Our model provides a structured approach and considers network structures and interdependencies. The insights gained by our model present a profound economic basis for investment decisions on IT security measures. By applying our model in an exemplary real-world setting, we analyze various IT security measures and their risk reduction effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Björn Häckel & Florian Hänsch & Michael Hertel & Jochen Übelhör, 2019. "Assessing IT availability risks in smart factory networks," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 523-558, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:busres:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40685-018-0071-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40685-018-0071-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40685-018-0071-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40685-018-0071-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernanda Strozzi & Claudia Colicchia & Alessandro Creazza & Carlo Noè, 2017. "Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6572-6591, November.
    2. Anat Hovav & John D'Arcy, 2003. "The Impact of Denial‐of‐Service Attack Announcements on the Market Value of Firms," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 97-121, September.
    3. Ackermann, Tobias & Buxmann, Peter, 2010. "Quantifying Risks in Service Networks: Using Probability Distributions for the Evaluation of Optimal Security Levels," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 46351, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Wagner, Stephan M. & Neshat, Nikrouz, 2010. "Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 121-129, July.
    5. Hallikas, Jukka & Karvonen, Iris & Pulkkinen, Urho & Virolainen, Veli-Matti & Tuominen, Markku, 2004. "Risk management processes in supplier networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 47-58, July.
    6. Sergey V. Buldyrev & Roni Parshani & Gerald Paul & H. Eugene Stanley & Shlomo Havlin, 2010. "Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7291), pages 1025-1028, April.
    7. M Arns & M Fischer & P Kemper & C Tepper, 2002. "Supply chain modelling and its analytical evaluation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(8), pages 885-894, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Miehle & Björn Häckel & Stefan Pfosser & Jochen Übelhör, 2020. "Modeling IT Availability Risks in Smart Factories," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 323-345, August.
    2. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    3. Bier, Vicki & Gutfraind, Alexander, 2019. "Risk analysis beyond vulnerability and resilience – characterizing the defensibility of critical systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 626-636.
    4. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    5. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Wang, Chengjiang & Wang, Li & Wang, Juan & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2017. "Inferring the reputation enhances the cooperation in the public goods game on interdependent lattices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 18-29.
    7. Chen, Lei & Yue, Dong & Dou, Chunxia, 2019. "Optimization on vulnerability analysis and redundancy protection in interdependent networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1216-1226.
    8. Guido Caldarelli & Matthieu Cristelli & Andrea Gabrielli & Luciano Pietronero & Antonio Scala & Andrea Tacchella, 2012. "A Network Analysis of Countries’ Export Flows: Firm Grounds for the Building Blocks of the Economy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    10. Hesping, Frank Henrik & Schiele, Holger, 2016. "Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-117.
    11. Shang, Lihui & Zhao, Mingming & Ai, Jun & Su, Zhan, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the Sznajd model on interdependent chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    12. Doumen, Sjoerd C. & Nguyen, Phuong & Kok, Koen, 2022. "Challenges for large-scale Local Electricity Market implementation reviewed from the stakeholder perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    13. Shogo Mizutaka & Kousuke Yakubo, 2017. "Structural instability of large-scale functional networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, July.
    14. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    15. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    16. Yunsheng Deng & Jihui Zhang, 2022. "The choice-decision based on memory and payoff favors cooperation in stag hunt game on interdependent networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(2), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Dong, Zhengcheng & Tian, Meng & Liang, Jiaqi & Fang, Yanjun & Lu, Yuxin, 2019. "Research on the connection radius of dependency links in interdependent spatial networks against cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 555-564.
    18. Satish Kumar & Filomena Maggino & Raj V. Mahto & Riya Sureka & Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Weng Marc Lim, 2022. "Social Indicators Research: A Retrospective Using Bibliometric Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 413-448, July.
    19. Zsuzsanna Bacsi & Mária Fekete-Farkas & Muhammad Imam Ma’ruf, 2023. "A Graph-Based Network Analysis of Global Coffee Trade—The Impact of COVID-19 on Trade Relations in 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-32, February.
    20. Deng, Ye & Wu, Jun & Tan, Yue-jin, 2016. "Optimal attack strategy of complex networks based on tabu search," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 74-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:busres:v:12:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40685-018-0071-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.