IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/bioerq/v3y2018i2d10.1007_s41247-018-0039-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment of Biodiesel Supply Chain from Various Biomasses and Conversion Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Sahar Safarian

    (Scientific and Technological Department of Presidential Office)

  • Sorena Sattari

    (Sharif University of Technology)

  • Zeinab Hamidzadeh

    (Scientific and Technological Department of Presidential Office)

Abstract

This paper develops a comprehensive sustainability assessment of producing biodiesel from five different types of feedstocks and totally 15 biomasses in Iran: (i) edible oil seeds (canola, soybean, olive, walnut, hazelnut, almond, sunflower, corn, and peanut), (ii) nonedible oil seeds (cotton and jatropha), (iii) waste cooking oil (WCO), (iv) animal fat (tallow and poultry), and (v) microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris). This assessment integrates the most significant economic, energy, environmental, and social aspects to compare and rank 15 biodiesel systems. The results show that WCO with production cost of 600$/tonbd, EUE of 2.8 and GHG emission of 0.35 ton CO2eq/tonbd is the top rank system from economic, energy and environmental perspectives, followed by tallow by having 876$/tonbd, 1.76 and 0.45 ton CO2eq/tonbd for production cost, EUE and GHG emission, respectively. Jatropha has also dominant statues socially and economic by having 7910 h/tonbd and 755$/tonbd for labor required and production cost, respectively but not suggested for Iran due to high water consumption (1053 m3/tonbd) and land use (10.9 ha/tonbd). Although algae takes up the top rank environmentally, it is not proposed because it has the highest production cost (5800$/tonbd) and very low job opportunity (65 h/tonbd). Finally, under different assessments, walnut and hazelnut have the higher ranks over the first-generation systems; however, in social aspect, cotton is in the high position.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahar Safarian & Sorena Sattari & Zeinab Hamidzadeh, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Biodiesel Supply Chain from Various Biomasses and Conversion Technologies," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:3:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s41247-018-0039-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41247-018-0039-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41247-018-0039-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41247-018-0039-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Tiwari,Ujjal, 2015. "The economic viability of jatropha biodiesel in Nepal," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7295, The World Bank.
    2. Xue, Xiaobo & Collinge, William O. & Shrake, Scott O. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2012. "Regional life cycle assessment of soybean derived biodiesel for transportation fleets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 295-303.
    3. Tsai, Wen-Tien, 2010. "Energy sustainability from analysis of sustainable development indicators: A case study in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2131-2138, September.
    4. Ou, Xunmin & Zhang, Xiliang & Chang, Shiyan & Guo, Qingfang, 2009. "Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People's Republic of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 197-208, November.
    5. Santagata, R. & Ripa, M. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "An environmental assessment of electricity production from slaughterhouse residues. Linking urban, industrial and waste management systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 175-188.
    6. Safieddin Ardebili, M. & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Chegeni, A., 2011. "Biodiesel production potential from edible oil seeds in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3041-3044, August.
    7. Gnansounou, Edgard & Kenthorai Raman, Jegannathan, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 300-308.
    8. Atapour, Mehdi & Kariminia, Hamid-Reza, 2011. "Characterization and transesterification of Iranian bitter almond oil for biodiesel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2377-2381, July.
    9. Safarian, Sahar & Saboohi, Yadollah & Kateb, Movaffaq, 2013. "Evaluation of energy recovery and potential of hydrogen production in Iranian natural gas transmission network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 65-77.
    10. Escobar, José C. & Lora, Electo S. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Yáñez, Edgar E. & Castillo, Edgar F. & Almazan, Oscar, 2009. "Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1275-1287, August.
    11. James W. Murray, 2016. "Limitations of Oil Production to the IPCC Scenarios: The New Realities of US and Global Oil Production," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Akram, Asadolah & Ghobadian, Barat & Rafiee, Shahin & Heijungs, Reinout & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2016. "Environmental impact assessment of olive pomace oil biodiesel production and consumption: A comparative lifecycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 87-102.
    13. Hou, Jian & Zhang, Peidong & Yuan, Xianzheng & Zheng, Yonghong, 2011. "Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean, jatropha and microalgae in China conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 5081-5091.
    14. Azadeh, Ali & Vafa Arani, Hamed & Dashti, Hossein, 2014. "A stochastic programming approach towards optimization of biofuel supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 513-525.
    15. Xiangzheng Deng & Jianzhi Han & Fang Yin, 2012. "Net Energy, CO 2 Emission and Land-Based Cost-Benefit Analyses of Jatropha Biodiesel: A Case Study of the Panzhihua Region of Sichuan Province in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Keyhani, Alireza & Mostofi-Sarkari, Mohammad Reza & Jafari, Ali, 2012. "Energy and economic analysis of different seed corn harvesting systems in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 469-476.
    17. Ghobadian, Barat, 2012. "Liquid biofuels potential and outlook in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4379-4384.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Safarian, Sahar & Ebrahimi Saryazdi, Seyed Mohammad & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Sahar Safarian & Sorena Sattari & Runar Unnthorsson & Zeinab Hamidzadeh, 2019. "Prioritization of Bioethanol Production Systems from Agricultural and Waste Agricultural Biomass Using Multi-criteria Decision Making," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    5. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2020. "A deep learning approach for prediction of syngas lower heating value from CFB gasifier in Aspen plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Sahar Safarian & Runar Unnthorsson & Christiaan Richter, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Power Supply Chain by Using Waste Biomass Gasification in Iceland," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Sahar Safarian & Runar Unnthorsson, 2018. "An Assessment of the Sustainability of Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Production from Wastes in Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Sahar Safarian & Seyed Mohammad Ebrahimi Saryazdi & Runar Unnthorsson & Christiaan Richter, 2021. "Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Bioethanol Production Via Syngas Fermentation," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Abdi, Reza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2017. "Expanded polystyrene waste application for improving biodiesel environmental performance parameters from life cycle assessment point of view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 278-298.
    2. Hasan, Atiye Haj & Avami, Akram, 2018. "Water and emissions nexus for biodiesel in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 354-363.
    3. Sahar Safarian & Sorena Sattari & Runar Unnthorsson & Zeinab Hamidzadeh, 2019. "Prioritization of Bioethanol Production Systems from Agricultural and Waste Agricultural Biomass Using Multi-criteria Decision Making," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Akram, Asadolah & Ghobadian, Barat & Rafiee, Shahin & Heijungs, Reinout & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2016. "Environmental impact assessment of olive pomace oil biodiesel production and consumption: A comparative lifecycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 87-102.
    5. Sahar Safarian & Runar Unnthorsson, 2018. "An Assessment of the Sustainability of Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Production from Wastes in Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Milazzo, M.F. & Spina, F. & Primerano, P. & Bart, J.C.J., 2013. "Soy biodiesel pathways: Global prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 579-624.
    7. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Gasparatos, A. & von Maltitz, G.P. & Johnson, F.X. & Lee, L. & Mathai, M. & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. & Willis, K.J., 2015. "Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: Drivers, impacts and priority policy areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 879-901.
    9. Liu, Huacai & Huang, Yanqin & Yuan, Hongyou & Yin, Xiuli & Wu, Chuangzhi, 2018. "Life cycle assessment of biofuels in China: Status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 301-322.
    10. Sehatpour, Mohammad-Hadi & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Sehatpour, Hesam-eddin, 2017. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles in Iran using a multi-criteria approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 295-310.
    11. Khishtandar, Soheila & Zandieh, Mostafa & Dorri, Behrouz, 2017. "A multi criteria decision making framework for sustainability assessment of bioenergy production technologies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: The case of Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1130-1145.
    12. Farzad Jaliliantabar & Barat Ghobadian & Gholamhassan Najafi & Talal Yusaf, 2018. "Artificial Neural Network Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Performance and Emissions in a Compression Ignition Engine Using Biodiesel Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Xunmin Ou & Xiaoyu Yan & Xu Zhang & Xiliang Zhang, 2013. "Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis for Bio-Liquid Jet Fuel from Open Pond-Based Micro-Algae under China Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Zhao, Yuanhao & Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Hao, Yan, 2021. "Converting waste cooking oil to biodiesel in China: Environmental impacts and economic feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    15. Seber, Gonca & Escobar, Neus & Valin, Hugo & Malina, Robert, 2022. "Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable aviation fuels from vegetable oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Mollahosseini, Arash & Hosseini, Seyed Amid & Jabbari, Mostafa & Figoli, Alberto & Rahimpour, Ahmad, 2017. "Renewable energy management and market in Iran: A holistic review on current state and future demands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 774-788.
    17. Behdad Shadidi & Gholamhassan Najafi & Mohammad Ali Zolfigol, 2022. "A Review of the Existing Potentials in Biodiesel Production in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Andwari, Amin Mahmoudzadeh & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul & Bagheri, Ghobad, 2013. "A review on green energy potentials in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 533-545.
    19. Avinash, A. & Subramaniam, D. & Murugesan, A., 2014. "Bio-diesel—A global scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 517-527.
    20. Živković, Snežana B. & Veljković, Milan V. & Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Krstić, Ivan M. & Konstantinović, Sandra S. & Ilić, Slavica B. & Avramović, Jelena M. & Stamenković, Olivera S. & Veljković, Vlad, 2017. "Technological, technical, economic, environmental, social, human health risk, toxicological and policy considerations of biodiesel production and use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 222-247.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:3:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s41247-018-0039-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.