IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v65y2023i5d10.1007_s12599-023-00816-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reference System Architecture with Data Sovereignty for Human-Centric Data Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Scheider

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering
    Technical University Dortmund)

  • Florian Lauf

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering)

  • Frederik Möller

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering
    Chair for Information Systems and Data-Driven Enterprise, TU Braunschweig)

  • Boris Otto

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Software and Systems Engineering
    Technical University Dortmund)

Abstract

Since the European information economy faces insufficient access to and joint utilization of data, data ecosystems increasingly emerge as economical solutions in B2B environments. Contrarily, in B2C ambits, concepts for sharing and monetizing personal data have not yet prevailed, impeding growth and innovation. Their major pitfall is European data protection law that merely ascribes human data subjects a need for data privacy while widely neglecting their economic participatory claims to data. The study reports on a design science research (DSR) approach addressing this gap and proposes an abstract reference system architecture for an ecosystem centered on humans with personal data. In this DSR approach, multiple methods are embedded to iteratively build and evaluate the artifact, i.e., structured literature reviews, design recovery, prototyping, and expert interviews. Managerial contributions embody novel design knowledge about the conceptual development of human-centric B2C data ecosystems, considering their legal, ethical, economic, and technical constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Scheider & Florian Lauf & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2023. "A Reference System Architecture with Data Sovereignty for Human-Centric Data Ecosystems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 577-595, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:65:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00816-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-023-00816-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-023-00816-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-023-00816-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohendet, Patrick & Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder, 2001. "The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1563-1591, December.
    2. Andreas Oehler, 2016. "Chancen der selbstbestimmten Datennutzung?! [Chances for the Self-Determined Use of Data?!]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 96(11), pages 830-832, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonia Meythaler & Annika Baumann & Hanna Krasnova & Oliver Hinz & Sarah Spiekermann, 2023. "Technology for Humanity," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 487-496, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bekkers, Rudi & Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria, 2008. "Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1837-1853, December.
    2. Consoli, Davide & Elche-Hortelano, Dioni, 2010. "Variety in the knowledge base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1303-1310, December.
    3. Antonio Prencipe & Luciano D'Amico & Danilo Boffa & Christian Corsi, 2024. "The effect of output additionality of public funding support on firm innovation. Evidence from firms of different sizes," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2278-2299, April.
    4. Denicolai, Stefano & Zucchella, Antonella & Strange, Roger, 2014. "Knowledge assets and firm international performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 55-62.
    5. Subtil Lacerda, Juliana & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2020. "Effectiveness of an ‘open innovation’ approach in renewable energy: Empirical evidence from a survey on solar and wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. van Wijk, J.C.A.C., 2002. "Dealing With Piracy. Intellectual Asset Management In Music And Software," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-86-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas, 2007. "New instruments in innovation policy: The case of the Department of Trade and Industry in the UK," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(9), pages 644-656, November.
    8. Sam Ransbotham & Eric M. Overby & Michael C. Jernigan, 2021. "Electronic Trace Data and Legal Outcomes: The Effect of Electronic Medical Records on Malpractice Claim Resolution Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4341-4361, July.
    9. Roberto Ganau & Roberto Grandinetti, 2022. "La capacit? innovativa delle regioni: riflessioni sul nuovo "triangolo industriale"," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 105-125.
    10. Kuok Kei Law & Youngjae Koh, 2023. "What Is Next? The Longer-Term Managerial Challenges following COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Bleda, Mercedes & Chicot, Julien, 2020. "The role of public procurement in the formation of markets for innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 186-196.
    12. Rudi Bekkers & Bodas Freitas, 2008. "Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Post-Print hal-01487467, HAL.
    13. Venturini, Roberto & Ceccagnoli, Marco & van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, 2019. "Knowledge integration in the shadow of tacit spillovers: Empirical evidence from U.S. R&D labs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 180-205.
    14. Marco MC Ceccagnoli & Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Roberto Venturini, 2013. "Cross-Functional Knowledge Integration, Patenting and Firm Performance," Working Papers TIMES² 2286693, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Manuel Acosta & Joaqu�n M. Azagra-Caro & Daniel Coronado, 2016. "Access to Universities' Public Knowledge: Who is More Regionalist?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 446-459, March.
    16. Hoyssa, Maria & Bruun, Henrik & Hukkinen, Janne, 2004. "The co-evolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 769-785, July.
    17. Paul H. Jensen & Elizabeth Webster, 2006. "Managing Knowledge Flows through Appropriation and Learning Strategies," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2006n06, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    18. Wadhwa, Anu & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2016. "Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 95-112.
    19. Benjamin Cabanes & Pascal Le Masson & Benoît Weil, 2020. "Organiser la création de connaissance pour l’innovation de rupture. Des communautés aux sociétés proto-épistémiques d’experts," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 35-60.
    20. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Degischer, Daniel, 2022. "Contextualizing deliberate learning from acquisitions: The role of organizational and target contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 194-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:65:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00816-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.