IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v4y2012i5p271-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wand and Weber’s Decomposition Model in the Context of Business Process Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Johannsen
  • Susanne Leist

Abstract

Whereas the benefits of decomposing process models are obvious, the question what actually characterizes a “good” decomposition of a business process model has been given little attention to date. In addition, the process of decomposition itself is considered as being an “art” in literature. Our approach for achieving a “good” decomposition is Wand and Weber’s decomposition model for information systems. As a first step in our investigation we aim to explore in how far the decomposition model can be adapted for business process modeling at all. The potential this model might bear for evaluating decompositions of process models has been promoted in literature quite often, while a corresponding investigation is still missing. We address this gap by the following research. In the long term, we intend to establish guidelines for decomposing business process models in a structured way. Copyright Gabler Verlag 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Johannsen & Susanne Leist, 2012. "Wand and Weber’s Decomposition Model in the Context of Business Process Modeling," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 271-286, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:4:y:2012:i:5:p:271-286
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-012-0229-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12599-012-0229-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-012-0229-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas W. Malone & Kevin Crowston & Jintae Lee & Brian Pentland & Chrysanthos Dellarocas & George Wyner & John Quimby & Charles S. Osborn & Abraham Bernstein & George Herman & Mark Klein & Elissa O'Do, 1999. "Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 425-443, March.
    2. Andrew Burton-Jones & Peter N. Meso, 2006. "Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 38-60, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. vom Brocke, Jan & Braccini, Alessio Maria & Sonnenberg, Christian & Spagnoletti, Paolo, 2014. "Living IT infrastructures — An ontology-based approach to aligning IT infrastructure capacity and business needs," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 246-274.
    2. Fredrik Milani & Marlon Dumas & Raimundas Matulevičius & Naved Ahmed & Silva Kasela, 2016. "Criteria and Heuristics for Business Process Model Decomposition," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 7-17, February.
    3. Fredrik Milani & Marlon Dumas & Raimundas Matulevičius & Naved Ahmed & Silva Kasela, 2016. "Criteria and Heuristics for Business Process Model Decomposition," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 7-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    3. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    4. Koichi Terai & Masahiko Sawai & Naoki Sugiura & Noriaki Izumi & Takahira Yamaguchi, 2002. "Business process semi‐automation based on business model management," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 215-234, October.
    5. Stephen Guisinger, 2001. "From OLI to OLMA: Incorporating Higher Levels of Environmental and Structural Complexity into the Eclectic Paradigm," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 257-272.
    6. Daniel D. Zeng & J. Leon Zhao, 2005. "Effective Role Resolution in Workflow Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 374-387, August.
    7. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Other publications TiSEM 6bbf5984-752c-4760-b899-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Eric Overby, 2008. "Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 277-291, April.
    9. Adhikary, Anirban & Sharma, Amalesh & Diatha, Krishna Sundar & Jayaram, Jayanth, 2020. "Impact of buyer-supplier network complexity on firms’ greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    10. Eric Overby & Sandra A. Slaughter & Benn Konsynski, 2010. "Research Commentary ---The Design, Use, and Consequences of Virtual Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 700-710, December.
    11. Tyson R. Browning, 2018. "Building models of product development processes: An integrative approach to managing organizational knowledge," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 70-87, January.
    12. Jan HRON & Tomas MACAK, 2011. "Adaptive organization design based on system integration," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(12), pages 565-572.
    13. Albert Plugge & Jacques Brook, 2013. "From Fragmented to Integrated IT Service Delivery: Identifying Coordinating Challenges," Working Papers 2013/04, Maastricht School of Management.
    14. Amit Basu & Robert W. Blanning, 2003. "Synthesis and Decomposition of Processes in Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 337-355, December.
    15. Alexander Osterwalder & Yves Pigneur, 2002. "An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business," Industrial Organization 0202004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Tyson R. Browning, 2009. "The many views of a process: Toward a process architecture framework for product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 69-90, March.
    17. Tyson R. Browning & Ernst Fricke & Herbert Negele, 2006. "Key concepts in modeling product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 104-128, June.
    18. Temponi, Cecilia & Bryant, Michael D. & Fernandez, Benito, 2009. "Integration of business function models into an aggregate enterprise systems model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 793-800, December.
    19. Brian T. Pentland, 2003. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Variety in the Execution of Organizational Work Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 857-870, July.
    20. Toshihiro Wakayama, 2008. "Thematic Networks: Structuring the Organization for Strategic Fit," Working Papers EMS_2008_09, Research Institute, International University of Japan.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:4:y:2012:i:5:p:271-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.