IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ariqol/v15y2020i4d10.1007_s11482-019-09732-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Quality of Life Perception Gap in Prison Health Care Settings: Rater Disparities among Incarcerated Patients and Peer Caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Grace Prost

    (University of Louisville)

  • Stephen J. Tripodi

    (Florida State University)

  • Jeffrey R. Lacasse

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

Peer caregivers are specially-trained incarcerated persons who support the needs of patients in correctional health care settings. Their role is of particular importance in light of the growing population of older adult prisoners with complex health problems in U.S. prisons. The purpose of the current study was to examine the disparity between patient and peer caregiver ratings of patient quality of life (QoL) in a sample of correctional health dyads (n = 52) in a state prison system. The current study also aimed to identify which patient and caregiver characteristics were most closely associated with emerging disparities. The sample and measures were described using frequencies and descriptive statistics. Patient QoL was measured using the McGill Quality of Life Scale-Cardiff Short Form and rater disparity was calculated at the individual- and group-level. Potential correlates were identified using bivariate statistics. Main results indicate group-level disparities were smallest among psychological and physical QoL (d = .06), and largest regarding existential QoL (d = .22). Few bivariate relationships were meaningful in effect, though patient characteristics accounted for 79% of emerging associations (viz. primary diagnosis). Though disparities emerged, peer caregivers in correctional health settings have unique strengths regarding assessment of patient QoL. Implications related to reducing dyadic disparities and targeting caregiver training regarding the importance of patient existential QoL are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Grace Prost & Stephen J. Tripodi & Jeffrey R. Lacasse, 2020. "The Quality of Life Perception Gap in Prison Health Care Settings: Rater Disparities among Incarcerated Patients and Peer Caregivers," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(4), pages 1223-1240, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09732-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11482-019-09732-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-019-09732-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11482-019-09732-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Novisky, Meghan A. & Narvey, Chelsey S. & Prost, Stephanie Grace, 2022. "Older Adults' perspectives on death and dying in prison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09732-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.