IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v83y2022ics0047235222000502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Older Adults' perspectives on death and dying in prison

Author

Listed:
  • Novisky, Meghan A.
  • Narvey, Chelsey S.
  • Prost, Stephanie Grace

Abstract

Incarcerated people often have extensive health needs compared to their community-dwelling peers. This is especially the case among older adults, who represent a sizeable and growing portion of the U.S. prison population with a concomitant health burden. While research has expanded in recent years regarding health-related experiences among older adults in prisons, research surrounding their perceptions of death and dying in these settings remains limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Novisky, Meghan A. & Narvey, Chelsey S. & Prost, Stephanie Grace, 2022. "Older Adults' perspectives on death and dying in prison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222000502
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235222000502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Grace Prost & Stephen J. Tripodi & Jeffrey R. Lacasse, 2020. "The Quality of Life Perception Gap in Prison Health Care Settings: Rater Disparities among Incarcerated Patients and Peer Caregivers," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(4), pages 1223-1240, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222000502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.