IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/apjors/v7y2023i2d10.1007_s41685-023-00292-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erosion vulnerable area assessment of Jamuna River system in Bangladesh using a multi-criteria-based geospatial fuzzy expert system and remote sensing

Author

Listed:
  • Kazi Faiz Alam

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Tofael Ahamed

    (University of Tsukuba
    University of Tsukuba)

Abstract

Jamuna, a dynamic and unstable braided river system in Bangladesh, is approximately 240 km long and becomes extremely unstable during the rainy season resulting in serious bank erosion. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the erosion-prone areas adjacent to the Jamuna River system. Change detection analysis was carried out using Landsat 8 (OLI) images captured in 2020 by multi-criteria analysis using a geospatial fuzzy expert system and state-of-the-art remote sensing technology. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), normalized difference water index (NDWI), distance from the river, land use and land cover (LULC), and slope and elevation were selected as criteria for this analysis. All criteria maps were standardized using fuzzy membership functions and reclassification of each criteria performed. Furthermore, expert judgments were included to rank the criteria influencing vulnerable areas based on an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Finally, a weighted overlay map was prepared for erosion vulnerability assessment from the reclassified maps. From these analyses, we found that water bodies covered 1003 km2 (10.94%), high-to-moderate erosion-prone areas were 7401.21 km2 (77.39%), marginal erosion-prone areas 1065 km2 (11.61%) and nonerosion-prone areas only 5.9 km2 (0.06%), respectively. To verify the vulnerable areas, 150 reference points of water bodies from the mainstream of the Jamuna River were taken using Google Earth Pro images captured in 2020. These points were plotted on the NDWI maps of 2020 and 1990 to verify the detection of changes in the riverbank shifts for 30-year intervals. This confirmed the bank shifted from 3 to 4 km in more than 20 points during this span of time. Our analysis also confirmed that high-to-moderately erosion-vulnerable areas fall between 3 and 7 km. Therefore, we recommend the adoption of new agricultural land use planning, considering erosion venerable areas to ensure agricultural production and livelihood security.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazi Faiz Alam & Tofael Ahamed, 2023. "Erosion vulnerable area assessment of Jamuna River system in Bangladesh using a multi-criteria-based geospatial fuzzy expert system and remote sensing," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 433-454, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:7:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s41685-023-00292-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41685-023-00292-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41685-023-00292-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41685-023-00292-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Valentina Ferretti & Silvia Pomarico, 2012. "Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 843-867, October.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    4. Nazia Muhsin & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "GIS-based multi-criteria analysis modeling used to locate suitable sites for industries in suburban areas in Bangladesh to ensure the sustainability of agricultural lands," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 35-64, April.
    5. Saaty, Thomas L & Vargas, Luis G, 1984. "The legitimacy of rank reversal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 513-516.
    6. Khabat Khosravi & Ebrahim Nohani & Edris Maroufinia & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2016. "A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making techn," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 947-987, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tofael Ahamed, 2023. "Special issue on the assessment of climate change impacts on regional economics in South Asia," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 323-328, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazia Muhsin & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi, 2018. "GIS-based multi-criteria analysis modeling used to locate suitable sites for industries in suburban areas in Bangladesh to ensure the sustainability of agricultural lands," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 35-64, April.
    2. Manuel Casal-Guisande & Alberto Comesaña-Campos & Alejandro Pereira & José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez & Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño, 2022. "A Decision-Making Methodology Based on Expert Systems Applied to Machining Tools Condition Monitoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & José M. Merigó, 2018. "Subjective stakeholder dynamics relationships treatment: a methodological approach using fuzzy decision-making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 441-472, December.
    4. Cheng-Ru Wu & Che-Wei Chang & Hung-Lung Lin, 2008. "FAHP Sensitivity Analysis for Measurement Nonprofit Organizational Performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 283-302, June.
    5. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mar Arenas-Parra & Raquel Quiroga-García & Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2022. "An extended best–worst multiple reference point method: application in the assessment of non-life insurance companies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5323-5362, November.
    6. Johanna Vásquez & Sergio Botero, 2020. "Hybrid Methodology to Improve Health Status Utility Values Derivation Using EQ-5D-5L and Advanced Multi-Criteria Techniques," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Amit Kumar Gupta & Harshit Goyal, 2021. "Framework for implementing big data analytics in Indian manufacturing: ISM-MICMAC and Fuzzy-AHP approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 207-229, September.
    8. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    9. Caprioli, Caterina & Bottero, Marta, 2021. "Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: A fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    11. Kuang-Sheng Liu & Sung-Lin Hsueh & Wen-Chen Wu & Yu-Lung Chen, 2012. "A DFuzzy-DAHP Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Energy-Saving Design Strategies for Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Billal Hossen & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2021. "Land Suitability Assessment for Pulse (Green Gram) Production through Remote Sensing, GIS and Multicriteria Analysis in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Emrah Önder & Ali Hepşen, 2013. "Combining Time Series Analysis and Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques for Forecasting Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 3(3), pages 530-530.
    14. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    17. Pathiraja, Erandathie & Griffith, Garry & Farquharson, Robert & Faggia, Rob, 2019. "The Cost of Climate Change to Agricultural Industries: Coconuts in Sri Lanka," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(05), December.
    18. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    19. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:7:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s41685-023-00292-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.