IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v20y2022i5d10.1007_s40258-022-00747-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing a 'Soft Opt-Out' System for Kidney Donation in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Sameera Senanayake

    (Queensland University of Technology (QUT))

  • Helen Healy

    (Royal Brisbane Hospital for Women
    University of Queensland)

  • Steven M. McPhail

    (Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
    Metro South Health)

  • Keshwar Baboolal

    (Royal Brisbane Hospital for Women
    University of Queensland)

  • Sanjeewa Kularatna

    (Queensland University of Technology (QUT))

Abstract

Introduction There is a severe shortage of donor organs globally. There is growing interest in understanding how a 'soft opt-out' organ donation system could help bridge the supply and demand gap for donor organs. This research aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of implementing a 'soft opt-out' organ donation system for kidney donation. Methods A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the incremental costs from a health system’s perspective, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and death averted of people who have kidney failure, comparing a ‘soft opt-out’ organ donation system to an 'opt-in' system. This study analysed three scenarios where the 'soft opt-out' system generated a 20%, 30%, and 40% increase in deceased organ donation rates over 20 years. A 5-year time horizon was adopted for the budget impact analysis. Results A 20% increase in organ donation rates could have a cost saving of 650 million Australian dollars (A$) and a 10,400-QALY gain. A 20% increase would avert more than 1500 deaths, while a 40% increase would avert 3200 deaths over a time horizon of 20 years. Over the first 5 years, a 20% increase would have a net saving of A$53 million, increasing to A$106 million if the donation rate increases by 40%. Conclusion A 'soft opt-out' organ donation system would return a cost saving for the healthcare system, a net gain in QALYs, and prevention of a significant number of deaths. Advantageous budgetary impact is important, but understanding the aversion for a ‘soft opt-out’ system in Australia is also important and remains a priority for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sameera Senanayake & Helen Healy & Steven M. McPhail & Keshwar Baboolal & Sanjeewa Kularatna, 2022. "Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing a 'Soft Opt-Out' System for Kidney Donation in Australia," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 769-779, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:20:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-022-00747-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00747-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-022-00747-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-022-00747-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeynep Burcu Ugur, 2015. "Does Presumed Consent Save Lives? Evidence from Europe," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(12), pages 1560-1572, December.
    2. Sameera Senanayake & Nicholas Graves & Helen Healy & Keshwar Baboolal & Adrian Barnett & Sanjeewa Kularatna, 2021. "Time-to-event analysis in economic evaluations: a comparison of modelling methods to assess the cost-effectiveness of transplanting a marginal quality kidney," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joan Costa-Font & Caroline Rudisill & Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, 2021. "‘Relative Consent’ or ‘Presumed Consent’? Organ donation attitudes and behaviour," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 5-16, February.
    2. Selina Schulze Spüntrup, 2023. "Does Implementing Opt-Out Solve The Organ Shortage Problem? Evidence from a Synthetic Control Approach," ifo Working Paper Series 403, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Keser, Claudia & Späth, Maximilian, 2021. "Charitable giving: Framing and the role of information," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 424, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    4. Claudia Keser & Maximilian Späth, 2021. "Charitable Giving: Framing and the Role of Information," CIRANO Working Papers 2021s-23, CIRANO.
    5. Ugur, Zeynep B & Molina Pérez, Alberto, 2023. "The toll of COVID-19 on organ donation and kidney transplantation in Europe: Do legislative defaults matter?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Selina Schulze Spüntrup, 2020. "Widerspruch oder Zustimmung? Wodurch mehr Menschen zu Organspendern werden," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(04), pages 11-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:20:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-022-00747-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.