IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v19y2021i3d10.1007_s40258-020-00604-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Reduction of Anticancer Drugs from 2007 to 2019 in South Korea: The Impact of Pharmaceutical Cost-Containment Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Sun-Hong Kwon

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Hea-Sun Park

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Young-Jin Na

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Chul Park

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Ju-Young Shin

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

  • Hye-Lin Kim

    (Sahmyook University)

Abstract

Objectives To assess price reductions of anticancer drugs in South Korea over 12 years and analyze the association between price reduction, drug characteristics, and repricing mechanisms. Methods We constructed a dataset based on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) price log of anticancer drugs from January 2007 to June 2019. We investigated each mechanism that resulted in a price reduction, including actual transaction price (ATP), voluntary reduction by a manufacturer, price-volume agreement, expansion of indication or reimbursement scope, price cut at generic entry, lump price cut in April 2012, and re-evaluation. The price reduction rate per year was estimated by dividing the total number of price reduction events by the total period for which the products were on the market. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the characteristics-adjusted incidence rate ratio of the price reduction. Price reduction per event was also determined across originator and generic products. Data analysis was performed using R (version 3.5.1). Results Five hundred price reductions occurred in 439 new anticancer drugs, with a reduction rate per 100 product-years of 23. ATP was the most frequent cause (39.2%) but had minimal impact (average reduction per event of 3%), followed by lump price cut (19.2%) and voluntary reduction (10.2%). Generic entries and lump price cut had the greatest impact (16–29% reduction per event). ATP was the most frequently occurring mechanism, followed by generic entry, voluntary reduction, and the lump price-cut in April 2012. Conclusions The incidence of price reduction of anticancer drugs increased gradually due to various repricing mechanisms. Although these mechanisms are effective, improvements can be made. Well-designed mechanisms that actively regulate price adjustment are needed to establish repricing policies that adequately reflect changes in the value of drugs over their entire life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun-Hong Kwon & Hea-Sun Park & Young-Jin Na & Chul Park & Ju-Young Shin & Hye-Lin Kim, 2021. "Price Reduction of Anticancer Drugs from 2007 to 2019 in South Korea: The Impact of Pharmaceutical Cost-Containment Policies," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 439-450, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00604-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00604-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-020-00604-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-020-00604-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valérie Paris & Annalisa Belloni, 2013. "Value in Pharmaceutical Pricing," OECD Health Working Papers 63, OECD Publishing.
    2. Patricia Danzon;Li-Wei Chao, 2000. "Prices, Competition and Regulation in Pharmaceuticals: A Cross-National Comparison," Monograph 000462, Office of Health Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William C. N. Dunlop & C. Daniel Mullins & Olaf Pirk & Ron Goeree & Maarten J. Postma & Ashley Enstone & Louise Heron, 2016. "BEACON: A Summary Framework to Overcome Potential Reimbursement Hurdles," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(10), pages 1051-1065, October.
    2. Frances Ruane & Xiaoheng Zhang, 2007. "Where do MNEs Expand Production: Location Choices of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Europe after 1992," Papers WP211, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    3. Vogler, Sabine & Zimmermann, Nina & de Joncheere, Kees, 2016. "Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010–2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1363-1377.
    4. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2019. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 130-139.
    5. Afschin Gandjour, 2016. "Limiting Free Pricing of New Innovative Drugs After Launch: A Necessity for Payers?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 507-509, October.
    6. Maynou, Laia & Cairns, John, 2018. "What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90877, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Salas-Vega, Sebastian & Bertling, Annika & Mossialos, Elias, 2016. "A comparative study of drug listing recommendations and the decision-making process in Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1104-1114.
    8. Anna Hobbins & Luke Barry & Dan Kelleher & Koonal Shah & Nancy Devlin & Juan Manuel Ramos Goni & Ciaran O’Neill, 2018. "Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(11), pages 1345-1353, November.
    9. David Epstein & Leticia García-Mochón & Stephen Kaptoge & Simon G. Thompson, 2016. "Modeling the costs and long-term health benefits of screening the general population for risks of cardiovascular disease: a review of methods used in the literature," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 1041-1053, November.
    10. Dominik J. Wettstein & Stefan Boes, 2020. "The impact of reimbursement negotiations on cost and availability of new pharmaceuticals: evidence from an online experiment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. A. Carletto & A. Cicchetti & S. Coretti & V. Moramarco & M. Ruggeri, 2019. "Money back guarantee? A cost–benefit framework of performance-based agreements (PBAs) for the reimbursement of pharmaceuticals," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 89-101, March.
    12. Afschin Gandjour, 2023. "A Model-Based Estimate of the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold in Germany," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 627-635, July.
    13. García-Collado, Carlos Gustavo & Martínez-de-la-Plata, Juan Enrique & Montoro, María del Mar Maldonado & Morales, Alberto Jiménez & Hernández, Miguel Ángel Calleja & Martínez, Fernando Martínez, 2021. "Impact of a risk-sharing agreement in rheumatoid arthritis in Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 335-340.
    14. Jennifer Gill & Anna-Maria Fontrier & Dionysis Kyriopoulos & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1375-1397, December.
    15. Alexandru Burcea & Ioana Boeraş & Claudia-Maria Mihuţ & Doru Bănăduc & Claudiu Matei & Angela Curtean-Bănăduc, 2020. "Adding the Mureş River Basin (Transylvania, Romania) to the List of Hotspots with High Contamination with Pharmaceuticals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Anthony Harris & Jing Jing Li & Karen Yong, 2016. "What Can We Expect from Value-Based Funding of Medicines? A Retrospective Study," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 393-402, April.
    17. García-Mochón, Leticia & Espín Balbino, Jaime & Olry de Labry Lima, Antonio & Caro Martinez, Araceli & Martin Ruiz, Eva & Pérez Velasco, Román, 2019. "HTA and decision-making processes in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe: Results from a survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 182-190.
    18. Kleijnen, Sarah & Toenders, Wil & de Groot, Folkert & Huic, Mirjana & George, Elisabeth & Wieseler, Beate & Pavlovic, Mira & Bucsics, Anna & Siviero, Paolo D. & van der Graaff, Martin & Rdzany, Rafał , 2015. "European collaboration on relative effectiveness assessments: What is needed to be successful?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 569-576.
    19. Wettstein, Dominik J. & Boes, Stefan, 2022. "How value-based policy interventions influence price negotiations for new medicines: An experimental approach and initial evidence," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 112-121.
    20. Melanie Büssgen & Tom Stargardt, 2023. "10 Years of AMNOG: What is the Willingness-to-Pay for Pharmaceuticals in Germany?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 751-759, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-020-00604-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.