IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v14y2016i4d10.1007_s40258-016-0243-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Eliazar Sabater

    (Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia)

  • Armando López-Guillermo

    (Hospital Clinic)

  • Antonio Rueda

    (Hospital Costa del Sol)

  • Antonio Salar

    (Hospital del Mar)

  • Itziar Oyagüez

    (Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia)

  • Juan Manuel Collar

    (Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals)

Abstract

Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab–bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain. Methods A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab–bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness. Results Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab–bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab–bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab–bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab–bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations. Conclusion First-line therapy with rituximab–bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliazar Sabater & Armando López-Guillermo & Antonio Rueda & Antonio Salar & Itziar Oyagüez & Juan Manuel Collar, 2016. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 465-477, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:14:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0243-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julio López-Bastida & Juan Oliva & Fernando Antoñanzas & Anna García-Altés & Ramón Gisbert & Javier Mar & Jaume Puig-Junoy, 2010. "Spanish recommendations on economic evaluation of health technologies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(5), pages 513-520, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parastu Kasaie & Matthew Radford & Sunaina Kapoor & Younghee Jung & Beatriz Hernandez Novoa & David Dowdy & Maunank Shah, 2018. "Economic and epidemiologic impact of guidelines for early ART initiation irrespective of CD4 count in Spain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Barbieri & H. Weatherly & R. Ara & H. Basarir & M. Sculpher & R. Adams & H. Ahmed & C. Coles & T. Guerrero-Urbano & C. Nutting & M. Powell, 2014. "What is the Quality of Economic Evaluations of Non-Drug Therapies? A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Economic Evaluations of Radiotherapy for Cancer," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 497-510, October.
    2. Rivero-Santana, Amado & Cuéllar-Pompa, Leticia & Sánchez-Gómez, Luis M. & Perestelo-Pérez, Lilisbeth & Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro, 2014. "Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different immunization strategies against whooping cough to reduce child morbidity and mortality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 82-91.
    3. B. Rodríguez-Sánchez & S. Daugbjerg & L. M. Peña-Longobardo & J. Oliva-Moreno & I. Aranda-Reneo & A. Cicchetti & J. López-Bastida, 2023. "Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 247-277, March.
    4. Ralph Schmidt & Istvan Majer & Natalia García Román & Alejandra Rivas Basterra & ElizaBeth Grubb & Constancio Medrano López, 2017. "Palivizumab in the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children with congenital heart disease; a novel cost-utility modeling study reflecting evidence-based clinical pathways," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Ali Tafazzoli & Odette S. Reifsnider & Leana Bellanca & Jack Ishak & Marc Carrasco & Pal Rakonczai & Matthew Stargardter & Stephan Linden, 2023. "A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(9), pages 1441-1454, December.
    6. Kobelt, G., 2013. "Health Economics: An Introduction to Economic Evaluation," Monographs, Office of Health Economics, number 000004.
    7. Yumi Asukai & Andrew Briggs & Louis P. Garrison & Benjamin P. Geisler & Peter J. Neumann & Daniel A. Ollendorf, 2021. "Principles of Economic Evaluation in a Pandemic Setting: An Expert Panel Discussion on Value Assessment During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(11), pages 1201-1208, November.
    8. Puig-Junoy, Jaume & López-Valcárcel, Beatriz González, 2014. "Launch prices for new pharmaceuticals in the heavily regulated and subsidized Spanish market, 1995–2007," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 170-181.
    9. Bengt Jönsson & Grace Hampson & Jonathan Michaels & Adrian Towse & J.-Matthias Graf Schulenburg & Olivier Wong, 2019. "Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(3), pages 427-438, April.
    10. Leticia García-Mochón & Zuzana Špacírová & Jaime Espín, 2022. "Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 979-991, August.
    11. SeungJin Bae & SooOk Lee & Eun Bae & Sunmee Jang, 2013. "Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (Second and Updated Version)," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 257-267, April.
    12. Antonio García-Ruiz & Lucía Pérez-Costillas & Ana Montesinos & Javier Alcalde & Itziar Oyagüez & Miguel Casado, 2012. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of antipsychotics in reducing schizophrenia relapses," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio & Jesús Molina & Iñigo Ojanguren & Ana Viejo Casas & Alicia Huerta & Henrik Svedsater, 2020. "Cost–consequence analysis of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol for asthma management in Spain: an analysis based on the Salford Lung Study in asthma," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 7-17, February.
    14. Santiago Grau & Rafael Cámara & Manuel Jurado & Jaime Sanz & Belén Aragón & Irmina Gozalbo, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole tablets versus fluconazole as prophylaxis for invasive fungal diseases in patients with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(4), pages 627-636, May.
    15. Erik Nord, 2011. "Discounting future health benefits: the poverty of consistency arguments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 16-26, January.
    16. Lisanne I. Lier & Judith E. Bosmans & Hein P. J. Hout & Lidwine B. Mokkink & Wilbert B. Hout & G. Ardine Wit & Carmen D. Dirksen & Henk L. G. R. Nies & Cees M. P. M. Hertogh & Henriëtte G. Roest, 2018. "Consensus-based cross-European recommendations for the identification, measurement and valuation of costs in health economic evaluations: a European Delphi study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(7), pages 993-1008, September.
    17. José Rodríguez Barrios & Ferran Pérez Alcántara & Carlos Crespo Palomo & Paloma González García & Enrique Antón De Las Heras & Max Brosa Riestra, 2012. "The use of cost per life year gained as a measurement of cost-effectiveness in Spain: a systematic review of recent publications," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(6), pages 723-740, December.
    18. Blanca Gros & Antonio Galán & Emilio González-Parra & Jose Herrero & Maria Echave & Stefan Vegter & Keith Tolley & Itziar Oyagüez, 2015. "Cost effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients in Spain before and during dialysis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Pascal Crépey & Esther Redondo & Javier Díez-Domingo & Raúl Ortiz de Lejarazu & Federico Martinón-Torres & Ángel Gil de Miguel & Juan Luis López-Belmonte & Fabián P Alvarez & Hélène Bricout & Míriam S, 2020. "From trivalent to quadrivalent influenza vaccines: Public health and economic burden for different immunization strategies in Spain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Maria-Florencia Hutter & Roberto Rodríguez-Ibeas & Fernando Antonanzas, 2014. "Methodological reviews of economic evaluations in health care: what do they target?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 829-840, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:14:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s40258-016-0243-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.