IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aodasc/v9y2022i4d10.1007_s40745-020-00279-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preserving Privacy in Ethereum Blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • E. Sandeep Kumar

    (M.S Ramaiah Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Data transparency is one of the prime essence of Ethereum, because of which users cannot fake the transactions, a similar strategy that even Bitcoin follows. However, this very nature of Ethereum has made the blockchain vulnerable to security threats and attacks, this is due to the fact that transparency comes in a trade off with privacy. Lack of sophisticated privacy preservation techniques in Ethereum might eventually pave a way to attacks on the users and the blockchain itself. In this paper, we use the Ethereum blockchain transaction data of the January-2019 from Etherscan, constructed a graph/network and extracted informations using network measures like degree centrality, betweenness centrality, Eigen centrality, Page rank centrality, Minimum spanning tree and it’s associated node degrees, and prove that application of these kinds of network measures breaches the privacy of the Ethereum transactions (blockchains) while putting few active participants of the Ethereum blockchain under the risk of attack. In this context, two algorithms are proposed, one based on the chaotic maps and the other on the differential privacy to encrypt the edge weights of the transaction network which in turn leads to addition of the noise into the data set before release to the public. In specific, noise is added to the transacted amount information. A third party without the knowledge of the algorithm gets a false information due to the noisy data set. The whole process of privacy preservation is looked after by set of dedicated distributed servers which includes adding noise for privacy preservation and retrieving the original data back from noisy version when authenticated requests are made.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Preserving Privacy in Ethereum Blockchain," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 675-693, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aodasc:v:9:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s40745-020-00279-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40745-020-00279-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40745-020-00279-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40745-020-00279-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu Wang & Guohua Gan & Ling-Yun Wu, 2020. "Framework and algorithms for identifying honest blocks in blockchain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    2. Witold Nowiński & Miklós Kozma, 2017. "How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 173-188.
    3. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Tanković Ana Čuić & Prodan Marina Perišić & Benazić Dragan, 2023. "Consumer Segments in Blockchain Technology Adoption," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 162-172, December.
    5. Jiang, Rong & Kang, Yuanjie & Liu, Yongsong & Liang, Zhihong & Duan, Yunlong & Sun, Yani & Liu, Jialan, 2022. "A trust transitivity model of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises under blockchain-based supply chain finance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Lee, Jei Young, 2019. "A decentralized token economy: How blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 773-784.
    7. Sun, Yi & Jiang, Shiqing & Jia, Wanjiao & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Blockchain as a cutting-edge technology impacting business: A systematic literature review perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    8. Lambert Kofi Osei & Yuliya Cherkasova & Kofi Mintah Oware, 2023. "Unlocking the full potential of digital transformation in banking: a bibliometric review and emerging trend," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Riya Sapra & Parneeta Dhaliwal, 2021. "Blockchain: The Perspective Future of Technology," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Luis Lorenzo & Javier Arroyo, 2023. "Online risk-based portfolio allocation on subsets of crypto assets applying a prototype-based clustering algorithm," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-40, December.
    11. Wei Xu & Daning Hu & Karl Reiner Lang & J. Leon Zhao, 2022. "Blockchain and digital finance," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    12. Qilei Ren & Ka Lok Man & Muqing Li & Bingjie Gao & Jieming Ma, 2019. "Intelligent design and implementation of blockchain and Internet of things–based traffic system," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(8), pages 15501477198, August.
    13. Monika Mačiulienė & Aelita Skaržauskienė, 2021. "Conceptualizing blockchain‐based value co‐creation: A service science perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 330-341, May.
    14. Walsh, Clara & O’Reilly, Philip & Gleasure, Rob & McAvoy, John & O’Leary, Kevin, 2021. "Understanding manager resistance to blockchain systems," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 353-365.
    15. Oguntegbe, Kunle Francis & Di Paola, Nadia & Vona, Roberto, 2022. "Behavioural antecedents to blockchain implementation in agrifood supply chain management: A thematic analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Jonathan Jan Pieters & Alinda Kokkinou & Ton Kollenburg, 2022. "Understanding Blockchain Technology Adoption by Non-experts: an Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Ana Čuić Tanković & Marina Perišić Prodan, 2024. "Digital Natives' Attitudes towards Blockchain Technology Usage," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(3), pages 75-93.
    19. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    20. Catarina Lemos & Ricardo F. Ramos & Sérgio Moro & Pedro Miguel Oliveira, 2022. "Stick or Twist—The Rise of Blockchain Applications in Marketing Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aodasc:v:9:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s40745-020-00279-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.