IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v94y2000i1p91-10310.1023-a1018941805656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the trade‐offs between farm income and the reduction of erosion and nitrate pollution

Author

Listed:
  • M. Mimouni
  • S. Zekri
  • G. Flichman

Abstract

Water is a very limited resource in Tunisia, both in quantity and in quality. Problems of quality are related to urban, industrial and agricultural activity. Erosion is causing dams to silt up and is leading to phosphorus accumulation in water. The use of agrochemicals, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus, is causing problems of eutrophication. This paper presents the results of a study of sediment and nitrate pollution. The methodology used is based on the EPIC simulation model and a multi‐objective programming model (MOPM). The data generated by EPIC are input for the MOPM together with the economic variables. These tools are applied to a 486 ha farm located in northern Tunisia which includes an irrigated area of 300 ha. The study considers three objectives: maximization of gross margin, minimization of erosion, and minimization of nitrate losses. The non‐inferior set estimation method is implemented to generate the trade‐off curves between the objectives. Results show that nitrate losses are important for both rainfed and irrigated land. The same conclusion is valid for erosion. It is shown that the farmer can reduce the environmental burden without decreasing gross margin, since he is operating below the efficiency curve. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Suggested Citation

  • M. Mimouni & S. Zekri & G. Flichman, 2000. "Modelling the trade‐offs between farm income and the reduction of erosion and nitrate pollution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 91-103, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:91-103:10.1023/a:1018941805656
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018941805656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018941805656
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018941805656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gongbing Bi & Yan Luo & Jingjing Ding & Liang Liang, 2015. "Environmental performance analysis of Chinese industry from a slacks-based perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 228(1), pages 65-80, May.
    2. Çağatay Yıldırım & Hatice Türkten & Vedat Ceyhan & Ela Atış & Mehmet Hasdemir & H. Ece Salalı & Yarkın Akyüz & Figen Güngör, 2021. "Exploring opportunity cost of conversion to eco-friendly farming system: the case of Samsun and Adana provinces of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1447-1460, February.
    3. Guillermo Flichman & Florence Jacquet, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 67, pages 51-69.
    4. Guillermo Flichman & Florence Jacquet, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Post-Print hal-01201042, HAL.
    5. Flichman, Guillermo & Jacquet, Florence, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 67.
    6. J.C.J. Groot & W.H.A. Rossing & M. Tichit & N. Turpin & A. Jellema & J. Baudry & P.H. Verburg & L. Doyen & G.W.J. van de Ven, 2009. "On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: Learning from comparisons," Post-Print hal-00455433, HAL.
    7. Marius Rădulescu & Constanta Rădulescu & Gheorghiţă Zbăganu, 2014. "A portfolio theory approach to crop planning under environmental constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 243-264, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:91-103:10.1023/a:1018941805656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.