IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v94y2000i1p139-16210.1023-a1018908931155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SHADOC: a multi‐agent model to tackle viability of irrigated systems

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Barreteau
  • François Bousquet

Abstract

The viability of irrigated systems in the Senegal River Valley is being brought into question today due to their under‐utilization. We assume that their viability depends largely on the way their different components behave and interact. We therefore sought to examine in greater depth today's knowledge of the structure of these systems and activities performed within them. This led to the development of a multi‐agent system model, a kind of virtual irrigated system, with a special focus on rules in use for access to credit, water allocation and cropping season assessment as well as organization and coordination of farmers. The purpose of this paper is to show how this kind of tool is relevant to the study of irrigated systems' viability. As an example it is used to examine the influence of existing social networks on the viability of irrigated systems. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Barreteau & François Bousquet, 2000. "SHADOC: a multi‐agent model to tackle viability of irrigated systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 139-162, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:139-162:10.1023/a:1018908931155
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018908931155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018908931155
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018908931155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Elena Orduña Alegría & Niels Schütze & Samuel C. Zipper, 2020. "A Serious Board Game to Analyze Socio-Ecological Dynamics towards Collaboration in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Tesfaye Woldeyohanes & Arnim Kuhn & Thomas Heckelei & Lalisa Duguma, 2021. "Modeling Non-Cooperative Water Use in River Basins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Bell, Andrew & Zhu, Tingju & Xie, Hua & Ringler, Claudia, 2014. "Climate–water interactions—Challenges for improved representation in integrated assessment models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 510-521.
    4. Juan-Camilo Cardenas & Marco Janssen & Francois Bousquet, 2013. "Dynamics of rules and resources: three new field experiments on water, forests and fisheries," Chapters, in: John A. List & Michael K. Price (ed.), Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment, chapter 11, pages 319-345, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. An, Li, 2012. "Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 25-36.
    6. Olivier Barreteau & Patrice Garin & Alexandre Dumontier & Geraldine Abrami & Flavie Cernesson, 2003. "Agent-Based Facilitation of Water Allocation: Case Study in the Drome River Valley," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 441-461, September.
    7. Hare, M & Deadman, P, 2004. "Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 25-40.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:94:y:2000:i:1:p:139-162:10.1023/a:1018908931155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.