IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v344y2025i1d10.1007_s10479-024-06109-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equal-sharing extra revenues from broadcasting sports leagues

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengxing Zou

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Xuezi Mei

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Abstract

We consider the problem of revenue-sharing from broadcasting sports leagues by focusing on the axiom of equal benefits from additional viewers introduced in Bergantiños and Moreno-Ternero (J Math Econ 90:65–73, 2020a). This axiom states that when only adding audience to a particular game, the involved teams and non-involved teams should be respectively affected by the same amount. We show that this axiom, order preservation, and non-negativity characterize the family of convex combinations of the uniform rule and the equal-split rule. Replacing non-negativity with maximum aspirations yields convex combinations of the equal-split rule and concede-and-divide, whereas replacing it with weak upper bound yields convex combinations of the uniform rule and concede-and-divide. Moreover, by separately considering the impacts on involved and non-involved teams, we decompose equal benefits from additional viewers into two axioms. We then show that replacing either of its decomposition axioms with reallocation proofness maintains the validity of the axiomatizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengxing Zou & Xuezi Mei, 2025. "Equal-sharing extra revenues from broadcasting sports leagues," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 344(1), pages 457-478, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:344:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06109-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06109-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06109-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-06109-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource allocation; Broadcasting problems; Extra revenues; Axiomatization; Fairness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:344:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06109-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.