IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v342y2024i3d10.1007_s10479-023-05389-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redistribution of judicial resources for improved performance

Author

Listed:
  • Maansi Gupta

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

  • Nomesh B. Bolia

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

Abstract

The purpose of a judicial system is to ensure timely and equitable justice. The Indian judiciary is overburdened with cases and litigation is considered a slow process in the country. However, trading quality at the expense of long case durations is not in the public benefit. The current study develops a framework of mathematical models to determine the optimum judicial strength, and required reallocations and recruitments to maximize the number of cases disposed. The models can help decision makers optimally transfer and recruit judges based on their priorities, especially in the case of scarce resources. The models are empirically tested on a case of district courts in Delhi, India. Various scenarios with different parameters provide clear evidence of better performance. Even with the current judicial strength, the overall performance of the state judiciary can be improved through transfers, and 100% clearance rates can be achieved with recruitments within sanctioned limits. Further, comparisons among different policy scenarios also support implementing the recommendations for optimal disposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Maansi Gupta & Nomesh B. Bolia, 2024. "Redistribution of judicial resources for improved performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 2147-2168, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05389-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05389-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05389-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05389-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chemin, Matthieu, 2009. "Do judiciaries matter for development? Evidence from India," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 230-250, June.
    2. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2013. "An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 485-499.
    3. Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim, 2009. "Investor protections and economic growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-4, April.
    4. Luscombe, Ruth & Kozan, Erhan, 2016. "Dynamic resource allocation to improve emergency department efficiency in real time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 593-603.
    5. Liu, Zhongyi & Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Wang, Guanying, 2019. "Police staffing and workload assignment in law enforcement using multi-server queueing models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 614-625.
    6. Gupta, Maansi & Bolia, Nomesh B., 2020. "Efficiency measurement of Indian high courts using DEA: A policy perspective," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1372-1393.
    7. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2018. "DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 31-43.
    8. Beenstock, Michael & Haitovsky, Yoel, 2004. "Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 351-369, September.
    9. Zhao, Meng & Li, Xiaopeng & Yin, Jiateng & Cui, Jianxun & Yang, Lixing & An, Shi, 2018. "An integrated framework for electric vehicle rebalancing and staff relocation in one-way carsharing systems: Model formulation and Lagrangian relaxation-based solution approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 542-572.
    10. Nemirovski, Arkadi, 2012. "On safe tractable approximations of chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 707-718.
    11. Vieira, Bruno & Demirtas, Derya & van de Kamer, Jeroen B. & Hans, Erwin W. & van Harten, Wim, 2018. "A mathematical programming model for optimizing the staff allocation in radiotherapy under uncertain demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 709-722.
    12. Wenjie Chen & Hainan Guo & Kwok-Leung Tsui, 2020. "A new medical staff allocation via simulation optimisation for an emergency department in Hong Kong," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(19), pages 6004-6023, October.
    13. R. Ippoliti & G. Tria, 2020. "Efficiency of judicial systems: model definition and output estimation," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 385-408, January.
    14. Santosh Adhikari & Michael Alexeev, 2022. "Judicial efficiency and the comparative disadvantage of Indian manufacturing," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 375-404, February.
    15. Fatih Deyneli, 2012. "Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two-stage DEA method," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 477-493, December.
    16. Comi, Simona & Grasseni, Mara & Resmini, Laura, 2021. "Can judicial efficiency improve territorial attractiveness to FDI? The Italian experience," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Maansi & Bolia, Nomesh B., 2024. "Factors affecting efficient discharge of judicial functions: Insights from Indian courts," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Gupta, Maansi & Bolia, Nomesh B., 2020. "Efficiency measurement of Indian high courts using DEA: A policy perspective," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1372-1393.
    3. Falavigna, G. & Ippoliti, R., 2021. "Reform policy to increase the judicial efficiency in Italy: The opportunity offered by EU post-Covid funds," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 923-943.
    4. Stefan Voigt, 2016. "Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 183-208, October.
    5. Giacalone, Massimiliano & Nissi, Eugenia & Cusatelli, Carlo, 2020. "Dynamic efficiency evaluation of Italian judicial system using DEA based Malmquist productivity indexes," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Lopes, Nuno Q.M. & Silva, Maria C.A., 2024. "Scale and scope economies in first-instance courts: Portuguese specialized vs non-specialized courts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Pontus Mattsson & Jonas Månsson & Christian Andersson & Fredrik Bonander, 2018. "A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 109-139, August.
    8. Paolo Mazzocchi & Claudio Quintano & Antonella Rocca, 2024. "Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5621-5654, December.
    9. Jonas Månsson & Christian Andersson & Fredrik Bonander, 2022. "What lessons can be learned from cost efficiency? The case of Swedish district courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 431-451, December.
    10. Sila Mishra, 2023. "‘Cyclic syndrome’ of arrears and efficiency of Indian judiciary," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, January.
    11. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2018. "DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 31-43.
    12. Berlemann, Michael & Christmann, Robin, 2017. "The Role of Precedents on Court Delay - Evidence from a civil law country," MPRA Paper 80057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Panayotis Kapopoulos & Anastasios Rizos, 2024. "Judicial efficiency and economic growth: Evidence based on European Union data," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 71(1), pages 101-131, February.
    14. Eugenia Nissi & Massimiliano Giacalone & Carlo Cusatelli, 2019. "The Efficiency of the Italian Judicial System: A Two Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 395-407, November.
    15. Samantha Bielen & Wim Marneffe & Peter Grajzl & Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl, 2018. "The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(2), pages 303-333, June.
    16. Arnaud Deseau & Adam Levai & Michèle Schmiegelow, 2019. "Access to Justice and Economic Development: Evidence from an International Panel Dataset," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2019009, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    17. Melcarne Alessandro & Ramello Giovanni B., 2015. "Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 149-169, July.
    18. Grajzl, Peter & Silwal, Shikha, 2020. "Multi-court judging and judicial productivity in a career judiciary: Evidence from Nepal," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Samudra Sen, 2020. "Indian Judiciary Imprisoned: An Integrated AHP–TOPSIS Approach to Judicial Productivity," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 586-603, April.
    20. Roberto Ippoliti & Alessandro Melcarne & Giovanni Ramello, 2015. "Judicial efficiency and entrepreneurs’ expectations on the reliability of European legal systems," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 75-94, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Judiciary; Indian courts; Allocation; Judges;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05389-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.