IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v342y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05616-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated MCDM framework for evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable business performance

Author

Listed:
  • Kerui Yu

    (Duke University)

  • Qun Wu

    (Anhui University
    Anhui University)

  • Xiaoqing Chen

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Weizhong Wang

    (Anhui Normal University)

  • Abbas Mardani

    (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)

Abstract

As a responsible business philosophy, sustainable management is becoming a widely accepted management mode among managers, practitioners, stakeholders, and customers. The sustainable development of business management calls for the practice of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principle. Companies that neglect ESG criteria in their business operations may face unexpected consequences. Therefore, the ESG sustainable performance of the company is becoming a benchmark to evaluate environmental and social responsibility of companies worldwide. This paper proposes an integrated MCDM framework combining the interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IT2FAHP) and the interval type-2 fuzzy combined compromise solution (IT2F-CoCoSo) method for evaluating the ESG sustainable performance of listed companies. In the integrated MCDM framework, the interval type-2 fuzzy sets serve as an effective tool to transform qualitative linguistic evaluation into quantitative expression, the criteria weights are obtained using the IT2FAHP, and the rankings of alternatives are determined by the IT2F-CoCoSo method. The proposed method is applied in a case study on the ESG sustainable performance evaluation of five medical listed companies, which are evaluated based on three aspects: E, S, and G and further divided into 14 criteria. Results reveal that the most important criterion in the E, S, and G aspects are pollution treatment, health and safety, and risk management. It suggests that the Pfizer biopharmaceutical company has the best ESG sustainable performance among the five alternative medical listed companies. We perform a sensitivity analysis with random criteria weights and different parameter values to show the stability of the proposed approach. A comparison is also performed between our approach and some existing methods for validating the proposed approach. This analysis shows that the proposed approach is efficient and well-consistent with the other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerui Yu & Qun Wu & Xiaoqing Chen & Weizhong Wang & Abbas Mardani, 2024. "An integrated MCDM framework for evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable business performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 987-1018, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05616-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05616-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05616-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05616-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2021. "Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1426-1445, September.
    2. Cerqueti, Roy & Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Nicolosi, Marco, 2021. "ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Buchanan, Bonnie & Cao, Cathy Xuying & Chen, Chongyang, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 73-95.
    4. Lööf, Hans & Sahamkhadam, Maziar & Stephan, Andreas, 2022. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    5. Chiara Mio & Antonio Costantini & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 367-384, March.
    6. Nadezhda I. Nedashkovskaya, 2018. "Investigation of methods for improving consistency of a pairwise comparison matrix," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(12), pages 1947-1956, December.
    7. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Di Giuli, Alberta & Kostovetsky, Leonard, 2014. "Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 158-180.
    9. Nisar Ahmad & Asma Mobarek & Naheed Nawazesh Roni, 2021. "Revisiting the impact of ESG on financial performance of FTSE350 UK firms: Static and dynamic panel data analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1900500-190, January.
    10. Rajesh Kr Singh & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Manjot Singh Bhatia & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Integration of green and lean practices for sustainable business management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 353-370, January.
    11. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    12. Deveci, Muhammet & Pamucar, Dragan & Gokasar, Ilgin & Delen, Dursun & Wu, Qun & Simic, Vladimir, 2022. "An analytics approach to decision alternative prioritization for zero-emission zone logistics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 554-570.
    13. Jeremy Galbreath, 2013. "ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 529-541, December.
    14. Siraj, Sajid & Mikhailov, Ludmil & Keane, John, 2012. "A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 420-428.
    15. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    16. Mahsa Fatemi & Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam & Ezatollah Karami & Dariush Hayati & Mathis Wackernagel, 2021. "An integrated approach of Ecological Footprint (EF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in human ecology: A base for planning toward sustainability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    17. Humphrey, Jacquelyn E. & Lee, Darren D. & Shen, Yaokan, 2012. "Does it cost to be sustainable?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 626-639.
    18. Michael V. Russo, 2009. "Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 307-319, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    2. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Burger, Eric & Grba, Fabian & Heidorn, Thomas, 2022. "The impact of ESG ratings on implied and historical volatility," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 230, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    4. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2024. "Causal complexity analysis of ESG performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Qin, Jindong & Zhou, Ligang & Mardani, Abbas & Deveci, Muhammet, 2022. "An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Zhihong Mao & Siyang Wang & Yu‐En Lin, 2024. "ESG, ESG rating divergence and earnings management: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3328-3347, July.
    7. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    8. Luo, Di, 2022. "ESG, liquidity, and stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Wu, Yanran & Zhou, Riwang & Zhang, Chao, 2024. "Size and ESG premiums: Evidence from Chinese A-share market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Ann Susan Thomas & Ambili Jayachandran & Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, 2024. "Strategic mapping of the environmental social governance landscape in finance – A bibliometric exploration through concepts and themes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4428-4453, September.
    11. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Curcio, Domenico & Gianfrancesco, Igor & Onorato, Grazia & Vioto, Davide, 2024. "Do ESG scores affect financial systemic risk? Evidence from European banks and insurers," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Liu, Xianda & Hou, Wenxuan & Main, Brian G.M., 2022. "Anti-market sentiment and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from anti-Jewish pogroms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Ved Dilip Beloskar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao, 2024. "Screening activity matters: Evidence from ESG portfolio performance from an emerging market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2593-2619, July.
    16. Chen, Zhixiong & Sugiyama, Kohei & Tasaka, Kazuyuki & Kito, Tomomi & Yasuda, Yukihiro, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social and governance initiatives on firm value: Analysis using AI-based ESG scores for Japanese listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    17. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Li, Yunzhong & Zhao, Yu & Ye, Chengfang & Li, Xiaofan & Tao, Yunqing, 2024. "ESG ratings and the cost of equity capital in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    20. Xue, Qinyuan & Jin, Yifei & Zhang, Cheng, 2024. "ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05616-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.