IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v338y2024i2d10.1007_s10479-024-06022-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The all-pairs vitality-maximization (VIMAX) problem

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Paul

    (Brown University)

  • Susan E. Martonosi

    (Harvey Mudd College)

Abstract

Traditional network interdiction problems focus on removing vertices or edges from a network so as to disconnect or lengthen paths in the network; network diversion problems seek to remove vertices or edges to reroute flow through a designated critical vertex or edge. We introduce the all-pairs vitality maximization problem (VIMAX), in which vertex deletion attempts to maximize the amount of flow passing through a critical vertex, measured as the all-pairs vitality of the vertex. The assumption in this problem is that in a network for which the structure is known but the physical locations of vertices may not be known (e.g., a social network), locating a person or asset of interest might require the ability to detect a sufficient amount of flow (e.g., communications or financial transactions) passing through the corresponding vertex in the network. We formulate VIMAX as a mixed integer program, and show that it is NP-Hard. We compare the performance of the MIP and a simulated annealing heuristic on both real and simulated data sets and highlight the potential increase in vitality of key vertices that can be attained by subset removal. We also present graph theoretic results that can be used to narrow the set of vertices to consider for removal.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Paul & Susan E. Martonosi, 2024. "The all-pairs vitality-maximization (VIMAX) problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1019-1048, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06022-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06022-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06022-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-06022-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    2. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2004. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 340(1), pages 388-394.
    3. Johannes O. Royset & R. Kevin Wood, 2007. "Solving the Bi-Objective Maximum-Flow Network-Interdiction Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 175-184, May.
    4. H. Donald Ratliff & G. Thomas Sicilia & S. H. Lubore, 1975. "Finding the n Most Vital Links in Flow Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 531-539, January.
    5. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    6. Tony H. Grubesic & Timothy C. Matisziw & Alan T. Murray & Diane Snediker, 2008. "Comparative Approaches for Assessing Network Vulnerability," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-112, January.
    7. Alan W. McMasters & Thomas M. Mustin, 1970. "Optimal interdiction of a supply network," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 261-268, September.
    8. H. W. Corley, Jr. & Han Chang, 1974. "Finding the n Most Vital Nodes in a Flow Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 362-364, November.
    9. Enayaty-Ahangar, Forough & Rainwater, Chase E. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2019. "A Logic-based Decomposition Approach for Multi-Period Network Interdiction Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 71-85.
    10. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    11. Konrad, Renata A. & Trapp, Andrew C. & Palmbach, Timothy M. & Blom, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Overcoming human trafficking via operations research and analytics: Opportunities for methods, models, and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 733-745.
    12. Kelly J. Cormican & David P. Morton & R. Kevin Wood, 1998. "Stochastic Network Interdiction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 184-197, April.
    13. E. Estrada, 2006. "Network robustness to targeted attacks. The interplay of expansibility and degree distribution," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 563-574, August.
    14. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle, 2015. "Operational Models of Infrastructure Resilience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 562-586, April.
    15. Saeid Rasti & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2019. "A survey of computational methods in protein–protein interaction networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 35-87, May.
    16. Rashid Anzoom & Rakesh Nagi & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2021. "A review of research in illicit supply-chain networks and new directions to thwart them," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 134-158, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    2. Starita, Stefano & Scaparra, Maria Paola, 2016. "Optimizing dynamic investment decisions for railway systems protection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 543-557.
    3. Tony H. Grubesic & Timothy C. Matisziw & Alan T. Murray & Diane Snediker, 2008. "Comparative Approaches for Assessing Network Vulnerability," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-112, January.
    4. Claudio Contardo & Jorge A. Sefair, 2022. "A Progressive Approximation Approach for the Exact Solution of Sparse Large-Scale Binary Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 890-908, March.
    5. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    6. Wei, Ningji & Walteros, Jose L., 2022. "Integer programming methods for solving binary interdiction games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 456-469.
    7. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    8. Shen, Yeming & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Wallace, William (Al), 2021. "Interdicting interdependent contraband smuggling, money and money laundering networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Jabarzare, Ziba & Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Najafi, Mehdi, 2020. "Dynamic interdiction networks with applications in illicit supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2020. "Protection-interdiction-restoration: Tri-level optimization for enhancing interdependent network resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    12. Bloch, Francis & Chatterjee, Kalyan & Dutta, Bhaskar, 2023. "Attack and interception in networks," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(4), November.
    13. Zhang, Dayong & Men, Hao & Zhang, Zhaoxin, 2024. "Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    14. Sohn, Insoo, 2019. "A robust complex network generation method based on neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 593-601.
    15. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Utsav Sadana & Erick Delage, 2023. "The Value of Randomized Strategies in Distributionally Robust Risk-Averse Network Interdiction Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 216-232, January.
    17. Kübra Tanınmış & Markus Sinnl, 2022. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Submodular Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2634-2657, September.
    18. Paola Cappanera & Maria Paola Scaparra, 2011. "Optimal Allocation of Protective Resources in Shortest-Path Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 64-80, February.
    19. Matthew Johnson & Alexander Gutfraind & Kiyan Ahmadizadeh, 2014. "Evader interdiction: algorithms, complexity and collateral damage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 341-359, November.
    20. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali, 2012. "Network interdiction to minimize the maximum probability of evasion with synergy between applied resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 411-442, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06022-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.