IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v324y2023i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04073-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A competitive pharmaceutical supply chain under the marketing mix strategies and product life cycle with a fuzzy stochastic demand

Author

Listed:
  • F. Shakouhi

    (University of Tehran)

  • R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

    (University of Tehran)

  • A. Baboli

    (CNRS, INSA of Lyon)

  • A. Bozorgi-Amiri

    (University of Tehran)

Abstract

This paper addresses a competition problem in two Pharmaceutical Supply Chains (PSCs) with their exclusive retailer and manufacturer. However, the key to successful manufacturing is not just understanding a Product Life Cycle (PLC), but also proactively managing products throughout their lifetime, applying the appropriate resources and sales and marketing strategies, depending on what stage products are at in the cycle. Providing a competitive pharmaceutical supply chain under a product life cycle and offering Nash and Stackelberg games under the marketing mix strategies (i.e., price, product quality, location, and advertising) and product life cycle (i.e., introduction, growth, and maturity) is a novel idea that needs to be studied. So, a demand function depends on the marketing mix strategies. The competition between PSCs is considered based on the levels of price, quality, access, and promotion (i.e., marketing mix) across different stages of their PLC. Concerning the PLC and the position of a supply chain in a specific period of their PLC, the considered competitions are Nash and Stackelberg. The results of the level of the marketing mix, demand, and profit for each supply chain are obtained by given different games in line with the stage of their PLC. Furthermore, based on investigating the previous annual data, the sensitivity coefficients of the marketing mix of PSCs in the demand function, these coefficients are considered as stochastic fuzzy parameters. Based on the obtained results, the average total profit of the two supply chains in the product life cycle, at Nash equilibrium, is 6.5 times that of Stackelberg. The average total profit of the first supply chain in the product life cycle, at Stackelberg, is 10% higher than Nash equilibrium. Moreover, the average total profit of the second supply chain in the product life cycle, at Nash equilibrium, is 19 times that of Stackelberg.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Shakouhi & R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & A. Baboli & A. Bozorgi-Amiri, 2023. "A competitive pharmaceutical supply chain under the marketing mix strategies and product life cycle with a fuzzy stochastic demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1369-1397, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:324:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04073-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04073-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04073-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04073-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keyuan Cai & Zhen He & Yaqi Lou & Shuguang He, 2020. "Risk-aversion information in a supply chain with price and warranty competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 61-107, April.
    2. Kumar Jena, Sarat & Sarmah, S.P, 2014. "Price competition and co-operation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 346-360.
    3. Anderson, Edward J. & Bao, Yong, 2010. "Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 227-234, January.
    4. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Koert van Ittersum, 2015. "Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 60-72, January.
    5. Andy A. Tsay & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Channel Dynamics Under Price and Service Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 372-391, August.
    6. Razieh Sadeghi & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Felix T. S. Chan & Jafar Heydari, 2019. "Coordinating and pricing decisions in two competitive reverse supply chains with different channel structures," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2601-2625, May.
    7. Yunlong Yu & Tiaojun Xiao & Zhangwei Feng, 2020. "Price and cold-chain service decisions versus integration in a fresh agri-product supply chain with competing retailers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 465-493, April.
    8. Fernando Bernstein & Awi Federgruen, 2005. "Decentralized Supply Chains with Competing Retailers Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 18-29, January.
    9. Jie Wei & Jing Zhao, 2015. "Pricing and remanufacturing decisions in two competing supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 258-278, January.
    10. Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Johari, Maryam & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2018. "A collaborative model for coordination of monopolistic manufacturer's promotional efforts and competing duopolistic retailers' trade credits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 108-122.
    11. Mohammad Mahdi Nasiri & Farzaneh Shakouhi & Fariborz Jolai, 2019. "A fuzzy robust stochastic mathematical programming approach for multi-objective scheduling of the surgical cases," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 890-910, September.
    12. Huang, Yongxi & Chen, Yihsu, 2014. "Analysis of an imperfectly competitive cellulosic biofuel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yang, Danqin, 2008. "Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 187-200, July.
    14. Shamekhi Amiri, A. & Torabi, S. Ali & Ghodsi, R., 2018. "An iterative approach for a bi-level competitive supply chain network design problem under foresight competition and variable coverage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 99-114.
    15. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    16. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    17. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2012. "Price and service competition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 496-507.
    18. Yu, Min & Nagurney, Anna, 2013. "Competitive food supply chain networks with application to fresh produce," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 273-282.
    19. Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Pourakbar, Morteza, 2017. "Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1017-1035.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    2. Jena, Sarat Kumar & Sarmah, S.P., 2016. "Price and service co-opetiton under uncertain demand and condition of used items in a remanufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-21.
    3. Hong, Xianpei & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Wang, Wenjuan, 2015. "Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 12-22.
    4. Wang, Nengmin & He, Qidong & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 246-258.
    5. Rezapour, Shabnam & Hassani, Ashkan & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2015. "Concurrent design of product family and supply chain network considering quality and price," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 18-35.
    6. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Ali Ghavamifar & Amir Khosrojerdi, 2022. "Resilient network design of two supply chains under price competition: game theoretic and decomposition algorithm approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 825-857, March.
    7. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    8. Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Hashem Asadi & Ramin Sadeghian & Hadi Sahebi, 2018. "Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Li, Lin & Li, Guo, 2023. "Integrating logistics service or not? The role of platform entry strategy in an online marketplace," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Renbang Shan & Li Luo & Baoli Shi, 2023. "The choice of recycling strategies for decision-makers based on government subsidy and service budget," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1441-1472, February.
    11. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    12. Chen, Xu & Luo, Zheng & Wang, Xiaojun, 2019. "Compete or cooperate: Intensity, dynamics, and optimal strategies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 76-86.
    13. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 228-250.
    14. Biswas, Indranil & Avittathur, Balram & Chatterjee, Ashis K, 2016. "Impact of structure, market share and information asymmetry on supply contracts for a single supplier multiple buyer network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 593-601.
    15. Hua Ke & Yong Wu & Hu Huang, 2018. "Competitive Pricing and Remanufacturing Problem in an Uncertain Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Risk-Sensitive Retailers," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Kurata, Hisashi & Nam, Seong-Hyun, 2013. "After-sales service competition in a supply chain: Does uncertainty affect the conflict between profit maximization and customer satisfaction?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 268-280.
    17. Jena, Sarat Kumar & Meena, Purushottam, 2022. "Competitive sustainable processes and pricing decisions in omnichannel closed-up supply chains under different channel power structures," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Hou, Ruiqi & de Koster, René & Yu, Yugang, 2018. "Service investment for online retailers with social media—Does it pay off?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 606-628.
    19. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Sadeghi, Razieh, 2019. "Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 48-60.
    20. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:324:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04073-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.