IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v322y2023i2d10.1007_s10479-019-03341-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Anshu Gupta

    (Delhi Technological University)

  • Pallavi Sharma

    (M.D. University)

  • Akansha Jain

    (University of Delhi)

  • Hongbo Xue

    (Nankai University)

  • S. C. Malik

    (M.D. University)

  • P. C. Jha

    (University of Delhi)

Abstract

Six Sigma is a widely practiced, systematic, and structured methodology embedded with statistical methods and managerial philosophies for quality improvement by large firms along with small firms in the industrialized economies. Application of Six Sigma in Micro Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in developing economies is limited due to several barriers these firms face. In academic literature, there is unavailability of sufficient evidence of successful implementation of the practice in these firms to encourage and provide a roadmap for its implementation. Thus, there is a need for studies that presents frameworks with illustrative case studies demonstrating the implementation of Six Sigma in MSMEs. In the present times, MSME firms in developing economies are facing competition from world leaders, and thus it has become essential for them to focus on the quality of their manufacturing products and at the same time being productive and efficient. Moreover, in the literature, it is observed that the potential of operations research (OR) methods is not sufficiently explored in Six Sigma studies. OR-based methods and tools should be integrated into Six Sigma implementation frameworks as these methods expand the application portfolio and tackle some of the barriers that limit the application of Six Sigma in small-scale firms. In this paper, a Six Sigma implementation framework for an MSME organization is developed incorporating Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, apart from other conventional tools like cause and effect analysis, benefit effort analysis, Pareto analysis, control charts, etc. The proposed framework is illustrated in detail with the help of a real-life case study of an MSME in India. The results obtained after the implementation of this framework signify that the incorporation of MCDM in Six Sigma lead to a significant improvement in the sigma level of the firm despite of unavailability of sufficient resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Anshu Gupta & Pallavi Sharma & Akansha Jain & Hongbo Xue & S. C. Malik & P. C. Jha, 2023. "An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 713-753, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:322:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03341-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiju Antony, 2008. "Can Six Sigma be effectively implemented in SMEs?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 420-423, June.
    2. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    3. Jiju Antony, 2008. "Can Six Sigma be effectively implemented in SMEs?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 420-423, June.
    4. Tejaskumar S. Parsana & Darshak A. Desai, 2016. "A case study: to reduce process variability of valve seat depth in cylinder head using Six Sigma methodology," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 474-506.
    5. Anass Cherrafi & Said Elfezazi & Kannan Govindan & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes & Khalid Benhida & Ahmed Mokhlis, 2017. "A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4481-4515, August.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:02686900410557908 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Somayeh Soheilirad & Kannan Govindan & Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Norhayati Zakuan, 2018. "Application of data envelopment analysis models in supply chain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 915-969, December.
    8. Jin, Tongdan & Janamanchi, Balaji & Feng, Qianmei, 2011. "Reliability deployment in distributed manufacturing chains via closed-loop Six Sigma methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 96-103, March.
    9. Bin Zhou, 2016. "Lean principles, practices, and impacts: a study on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 241(1), pages 457-474, June.
    10. Kumari Amrita Tripathi & Saumya Singh, 2018. "Analysis of barriers to women entrepreneurship through ISM and MICMAC," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 346-373, July.
    11. Van der Duyn Schouten, Frank A. & Tapiero, Charles S., 1995. "OR Models for Maintenance Management and Quality Control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 211-213, April.
    12. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Chi-Yo Huang, 2012. "Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 159-190, August.
    13. Xinyi Zhou & Yong Hu & Yong Deng & Felix T. S. Chan & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1045-1066, December.
    14. S.V. Deshmukh & R.R. Lakhe, 2010. "Six Sigma awareness in Central Indian SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 200-212.
    15. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    16. Rana Basu & Prabha Bhola, 2015. "Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in Indian Service SMEs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 199-235, June.
    17. T.R. Veena & G.V. Prabhushankar, 2019. "A literature review on lean, Six Sigma and ISO 9001:2015 in manufacturing industry to improve process performance," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 162-180.
    18. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    19. Kumar, U. Dinesh & Nowicki, David & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Verma, Dinesh, 2008. "On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 456-467, February.
    20. Vernika Agarwal & Kannan Govindan & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & P. C. Jha, 2016. "An optimization model for sustainable solutions towards implementation of reverse logistics under collaborative framework," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(4), pages 480-487, December.
    21. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.
    22. Jiju Antony, 2004. "Six Sigma in the UK service organisations: results from a pilot survey," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(8), pages 1006-1013, October.
    23. Douglas C. Montgomery & William H. Woodall, 2008. "An Overview of Six Sigma," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 76(3), pages 329-346, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanif Malekpoor & Nishikant Mishra & Sameer Kumar, 2022. "A novel TOPSIS–CBR goal programming approach to sustainable healthcare treatment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1403-1425, May.
    2. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2020. "A new soft computing approach for analyzing the influential relationships of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    4. Patanjal Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "A decision framework for incorporating the coordination and behavioural issues in sustainable supply chains in digital economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 721-749, July.
    5. Chao Fu & Weiyong Liu & Wenjun Chang, 2020. "Data-driven multiple criteria decision making for diagnosis of thyroid cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 833-862, October.
    6. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    7. Ruben Heradio & David Fernandez-Amoros & Cristina Cerrada & Manuel J. Cobo, 2020. "Group Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Ji Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Chonghui Zhang, 2018. "An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Xiaojun Wang & Xu Chen & Christopher Durugbo & Ziming Cai, 2020. "Manage risk of sustainable product–service systems: a case-based operations research approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 897-920, August.
    10. Fuzhen Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Wei Cai, 2021. "Responsible Production for Sustainability: Concept Analysis and Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    11. Jafar Rezaei & Miłosz Kadziński & Chrysoula Vana & Lori Tavasszy, 2022. "Embedding carbon impact assessment in multi-criteria supplier segmentation using ELECTRE TRI-rC," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1445-1467, May.
    12. Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & D. Jinil Persis & Raiswa Saha & Murugan Pattusamy & V. Raja Sreedharan, 2023. "Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 249-281, May.
    13. A. Mohammed, 2020. "Towards a sustainable assessment of suppliers: an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 639-668, October.
    14. Hadi Mokhtari & Mohammad Taghi Rezvan, 2020. "A single-supplier, multi-buyer, multi-product VMI production-inventory system under partial backordering," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-57, March.
    15. Kellner, Florian & Lienland, Bernhard & Utz, Sebastian, 2019. "An a posteriori decision support methodology for solving the multi-criteria supplier selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 505-522.
    16. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao, 2022. "A gained and lost dominance score method with conflict analysis for green economy development evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 623-655, September.
    17. Hayk Manucharyan, 2020. "Dealing with uncertainties of green supplier selection: a fuzzy approach," Working Papers 2020-13, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    18. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Zahra Dashtian & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Hana Tomaskova & Mehdi Soltani & Nasim Sadat Mousavi, 2021. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Supply Chain: Threshold of Robustness Worthiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-30, June.
    19. Abid Haleem & Shahbaz Khan & Sunil Luthra & Harshit Varshney & Musaib Alam & Mohd Imran Khan, 2021. "Supplier evaluation in the context of circular economy: A forward step for resilient business and environment concern," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2119-2146, May.
    20. Yadavalli, Venkata SS & Darbari, Jyoti Dhingra & Bhayana, Nidhi & Jha, P.C. & Agarwal, Vernika, 2019. "An integrated optimization model for selection of sustainable suppliers based on customers’ expectations," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:322:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03341-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.