IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v321y2023i1d10.1007_s10479-022-04841-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer-to-peer risk sharing with an application to flood risk pooling

Author

Listed:
  • Runhuan Feng

    (University of Illinois)

  • Chongda Liu

    (University of Illinois)

  • Stephen Taylor

    (New Jersey Institute of Technology
    Stevens Institute of Technology)

Abstract

With the rise of decentralized finance and insurance technology, there has been growing interest in the financial industry for risk sharing mechanisms without a central authority or clearing house. In contrast with classic centralized risk sharing, a novel peer-to-peer risk sharing framework is proposed. The presented framework aims to devise a risk allocation mechanism that is structurally decentralized, Pareto optimal, and mathematically fair. An explicit form for the pool allocation ratio matrix is derived, and convex programming techniques are applied to determine the optimal pooling mechanism in a constrained variance reduction setting. A tiered hierarchical generalization is also constructed to improve computational efficiency. As an illustration, these techniques are applied to a flood risk pooling example. Flood risk is known to be difficult to cover in practice, which contributes to the stagnant development for a private insurance market. It is shown in this paper that peer-to-peer risk sharing techniques provide an economically viable alternative to traditional flood insurance policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Runhuan Feng & Chongda Liu & Stephen Taylor, 2023. "Peer-to-peer risk sharing with an application to flood risk pooling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 813-842, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:321:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04841-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04841-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04841-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04841-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Mainik & Georgi Mitov & Ludger Ruschendorf, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Papers 1505.04045, arXiv.org.
    2. Bühlmann, Hans & Jewell, William S., 1979. "Optimal Risk Exchanges," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 243-262, December.
    3. Mainik, Georg & Mitov, Georgi & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-134.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/361 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Guillaume Carlier & Rose-Anne Dana & Alfred Galichon, 2012. "Pareto efficiency for the concave order and multivariate comonotonicity," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01053549, HAL.
    6. Paul Embrechts & Haiyan Liu & Tiantian Mao & Ruodu Wang, 2017. "Quantile-Based Risk Sharing with Heterogeneous Beliefs," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 17-65, Swiss Finance Institute, revised Jan 2018.
    7. Denuit, Michel & Dhaene, Jan, 2012. "Convex order and comonotonic conditional mean risk sharing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 265-270.
    8. Vali Asimit & Liang Peng & Ruodu Wang & Alex Yu, 2019. "An efficient approach to quantile capital allocation and sensitivity analysis," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1131-1156, October.
    9. Guillaume Carlier & Rose-Anne Dana & Alfred Galichon, 2012. "Pareto efficiency for the concave order and multivariate comonotonicity," SciencePo Working papers hal-01053549, HAL.
    10. Carlier, G. & Dana, R.-A. & Galichon, A., 2012. "Pareto efficiency for the concave order and multivariate comonotonicity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 207-229.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9713 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5rkqqmvrn4tl22s9mc0p00hch is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2020. "From risk sharing to risk transfer: the analytics of collaborative insurance," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020017, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. E. Jouini & W. Schachermayer & N. Touzi, 2008. "Optimal Risk Sharing For Law Invariant Monetary Utility Functions," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 269-292, April.
    15. Arthur Charpentier & Lariosse Kouakou & Matthias Lowe & Philipp Ratz & Franck Vermet, 2021. "Collaborative Insurance Sustainability and Network Structure," Papers 2107.02764, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    16. Denuit, Michel, 2019. "Investing in your own and peers' risks: The simple analytics of p2p insurance," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019028, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    17. Furman, Edward & Kuznetsov, Alexey & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2018. "Weighted risk capital allocations in the presence of systematic risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 75-81.
    18. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/5rkqqmvrn4tl22s9mc0p00hch is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Oliver E. J. Wing & Nicholas Pinter & Paul D. Bates & Carolyn Kousky, 2020. "New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Ghossoub & Michael B. Zhu & Wing Fung Chong, 2024. "Pareto-Optimal Peer-to-Peer Risk Sharing with Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.05103, arXiv.org.
    2. Jan Dhaene & Rodrigue Kazzi & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2024. "Axiomatic characterizations of some simple risk-sharing rules," Papers 2411.06240, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Gabriel Lauzier & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2023. "Risk sharing, measuring variability, and distortion riskmetrics," Papers 2302.04034, arXiv.org.
    2. Matteo Burzoni & Alessandro Doldi & Enea Monzio Compagnoni, 2022. "Risk Sharing with Deep Neural Networks," Papers 2212.11752, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    3. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2019. "Multivariate Systemic Optimal Risk Transfer Equilibrium," Papers 1912.12226, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    4. Bernard, C. & De Gennaro Aquino, L. & Vanduffel, S., 2023. "Optimal multivariate financial decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 468-483.
    5. Francesca Biagini & Alessandro Doldi & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Marco Frittelli & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2019. "Systemic Optimal Risk Transfer Equilibrium," Papers 1907.04257, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    6. Zhanyi Jiao & Steven Kou & Yang Liu & Ruodu Wang, 2022. "An axiomatic theory for anonymized risk sharing," Papers 2208.07533, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Mario Ghossoub & Michael B. Zhu & Wing Fung Chong, 2024. "Pareto-Optimal Peer-to-Peer Risk Sharing with Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.05103, arXiv.org.
    8. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Marlon Ruoso Moresco, 2024. "Inf-convolution and optimal risk sharing with countable sets of risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 829-860, May.
    9. Kiesel Swen & Rüschendorf Ludger, 2014. "Optimal risk allocation for convex risk functionals in general risk domains," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(3-4), pages 335-365, December.
    10. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, 2021. "Risk sharing under heterogeneous beliefs without convexity," Papers 2108.05791, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    11. Alfred Galichon & Damien Bosc, 2010. "Extreme dependence for multivariate data," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03588294, HAL.
    12. Damien Bosc & Alfred Galichon, 2014. "Extreme dependence for multivariate data," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03470461, HAL.
    13. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2021. "Real-Valued Systemic Risk Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Mitja Stadje, 2018. "Representation Results for Law Invariant Recursive Dynamic Deviation Measures and Risk Sharing," Papers 1811.09615, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    15. Mario Ghossoub & Giulio Principi & Ruodu Wang, 2024. "Allocation Mechanisms in Decentralized Exchange Markets with Frictions," Papers 2404.10900, arXiv.org.
    16. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "From risk sharing to pure premium for a large number of heterogeneous losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 116-126.
    17. Michail Anthropelos & Constantinos Kardaras, 2014. "Equilibrium in risk-sharing games," Papers 1412.4208, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    18. Chateauneuf, Alain & Mostoufi, Mina & Vyncke, David, 2015. "Multivariate risk sharing and the derivation of individually rational Pareto optima," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 73-78.
    19. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-074 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Fallou Niakh, 2023. "A fixed point approach for computing actuarially fair Pareto optimal risk-sharing rules," Papers 2303.05421, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    21. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Efron’s asymptotic monotonicity property in the Gaussian stable domain of attraction," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:321:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04841-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.