IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v257y2017i1d10.1007_s10479-015-1838-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint procurement and demand-side bidding strategies under price volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofeng Nie

    (Nanyang Technological University)

  • Tamer Boyacı

    (McGill University)

  • Mehmet Gümüş

    (McGill University)

  • Saibal Ray

    (McGill University)

  • Dan Zhang

    (University of Colorado at Boulder)

Abstract

We consider a firm buying a commodity from a spot market as raw material and selling a final product by submitting bids. Bidding opportunities (i.e., demand arrivals) are random, and the likelihood of winning bids (i.e., selling the product) depends on the bid price. The price of the commodity raw material is also stochastic. The objective of the firm is to jointly decide on the procurement and bidding strategies to maximize its expected total discounted profit in the face of this demand and supply randomness. We model the commodity prices in the spot market as a Markov chain and the bidding opportunities as a Poisson process. Subsequently, we formulate the decision-making problem of the firm as an infinite-horizon stochastic dynamic program and analytically characterize its structural properties. We prove that the optimal procurement strategy follows a price-dependent base-stock policy and the optimal bidding price is decreasing with respect to the inventory level. We also formulate and analyze three intuitively appealing heuristic strategies, which either do not allow for carrying inventory or adopt simpler bidding policies (e.g., a constant bid price or myopically set bid prices). Using historical daily prices of several commodities, we then calibrate our models and conduct an extensive numerical study to compare the performances of the different strategies. Our study reveals the importance of adopting the optimal integrative procurement and bidding strategy, which is particularly rewarding when the raw material prices are more volatile and/or when there is significant competition on the demand side (the probability of winning is much smaller when submitting the same bid price). We establish that the relative performances of the three heuristic strategies depend critically on the holding cost of raw material inventory and the competitive environment, and identify conditions under which the shortfalls in profits from adopting such strategies are relatively less significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofeng Nie & Tamer Boyacı & Mehmet Gümüş & Saibal Ray & Dan Zhang, 2017. "Joint procurement and demand-side bidding strategies under price volatility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 121-165, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:257:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-1838-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-1838-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-015-1838-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-015-1838-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awi Federgruen & Aliza Heching, 1999. "Combined Pricing and Inventory Control Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 454-475, June.
    2. Peter Berling & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2011. "Optimal Inventory Policies when Purchase Price and Demand Are Stochastic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 109-124, February.
    3. T. Fabian & J. L. Fisher & M. W. Sasieni & A. Yardeni, 1959. "Purchasing Raw Material on a Fluctuating Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 107-122, February.
    4. X. Guo & P. Kaminsky & P. Tomecek & M. Yuen, 2011. "Optimal spot market inventory strategies in the presence of cost and price risk," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 73(1), pages 109-137, February.
    5. Basil A. Kalymon, 1971. "Stochastic Prices in a Single-Item Inventory Purchasing Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 1434-1458, October.
    6. Vakharia, Asoo J. & Yenipazarli, Arda, 2009. "Managing Supply Chain Disruptions," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 2(4), pages 243-325, October.
    7. Ç Haksöz & S Seshadri, 2007. "Supply chain operations in the presence of a spot market: a review with discussion," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1412-1429, November.
    8. Schwartz, Eduardo S, 1997. "The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(3), pages 923-973, July.
    9. Kamal Golabi, 1985. "Optimal Inventory Policies When Ordering Prices are Random," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 575-588, June.
    10. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    11. Seifert, Ralf W. & Thonemann, Ulrich W. & Hausman, Warren H., 2004. "Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 781-799, February.
    12. Wang, Yunzeng, 2001. "The optimality of myopic stocking policies for systems with decreasing purchasing prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 153-159, August.
    13. Albert Y. Ha, 1997. "Inventory Rationing in a Make-to-Stock Production System with Several Demand Classes and Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1093-1103, August.
    14. Mogens Bladt & Michael SØrensen, 2009. "Efficient estimation of transition rates between credit ratings from observations at discrete time points," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 147-160.
    15. Mehmet Gümüş & Saibal Ray & Haresh Gurnani, 2012. "Supply-Side Story: Risks, Guarantees, Competition, and Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1694-1714, September.
    16. S. Özekici & M. Parlar, 1999. "Inventory models with unreliable suppliersin a random environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 91(0), pages 123-136, January.
    17. Jean-Philippe Gayon & Saif Benjaafar & Francis de Véricourt, 2009. "Using Imperfect Advance Demand Information in Production-Inventory Systems with Multiple Customer Classes," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 128-143, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duong An & Duy Tran Le Anh & Huong Le Thi Cam & Rajkishore Nayak & Majo George & Loan Bui Thi Cam & Nhu-Y Ngoc Hoang & Duy Tan Nguyen & Huy Truong Quang, 2024. "Navigating global supply networks: a strategic framework for resilience in the apparel industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 523-543, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canyakmaz, Caner & Özekici, Süleyman & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2019. "An inventory model where customer demand is dependent on a stochastic price process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 139-152.
    2. Güllü, Refik & Erkip, Nesim, 2024. "Risk pooling under demand and price uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 120-129.
    3. Alon Dourban & Liron Yedidsion, 2017. "Optimal Purchasing Policy For Mean-Reverting Items in a Finite Horizon," Papers 1711.03188, arXiv.org.
    4. Peter Berling & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2011. "Optimal Inventory Policies when Purchase Price and Demand Are Stochastic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 109-124, February.
    5. Xiong, Xing & Li, Yanzhi & Yang, Wenguo & Shen, Huaxiao, 2022. "Data-driven robust dual-sourcing inventory management under purchase price and demand uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Gürel, Yücel & Güllü, Refik, 2019. "Effect of a secondary market on a system with random demand and uncertain costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 112-120.
    7. Liu, Yifeng & Yang, Jian, 2015. "Joint pricing-procurement control under fluctuating raw material costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 91-104.
    8. Hall, George & Rust, John, 2021. "Estimation of endogenously sampled time series: The case of commodity price speculation in the steel market," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 219-243.
    9. Youhua (Frank) Chen & Weili Xue & Jian Yang, 2013. "Technical Note---Optimal Inventory Policy in the Presence of a Long-Term Supplier and a Spot Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 88-97, February.
    10. X. Guo & P. Kaminsky & P. Tomecek & M. Yuen, 2011. "Optimal spot market inventory strategies in the presence of cost and price risk," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 73(1), pages 109-137, February.
    11. Ankur Goel & Genaro J. Gutierrez, 2011. "Multiechelon Procurement and Distribution Policies for Traded Commodities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2228-2244, December.
    12. Karl Inderfurth & Peter Kelle & Rainer Kleber, 2014. "The Effect of Material Price and Product Demand Correlations on Combined Sourcing and Inventory Management," FEMM Working Papers 140013, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    13. Canyakmaz, Caner & Özekici, Süleyman & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2022. "A newsvendor problem with markup pricing in the presence of within-period price fluctuations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 153-162.
    14. Guang Xiao & Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2015. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Management Under Fluctuating Procurement Costs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 321-334, July.
    15. Karl Inderfurth & Peter Kelle & Rainer Kleber, 2018. "Inventory control in dual sourcing commodity procurement with price correlation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 93-119, March.
    16. Nicola Secomandi & Sunder Kekre, 2014. "Optimal Energy Procurement in Spot and Forward Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 270-282, May.
    17. Xing, Wei & Liu, Liming & Wang, Shouyang, 2014. "More than a second channel? Supply chain strategies in B2B spot markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 699-710.
    18. Inderfurth, Karl & Kelle, Peter & Kleber, Rainer, 2013. "Dual sourcing using capacity reservation and spot market: Optimal procurement policy and heuristic parameter determination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 298-309.
    19. Ben A. Chaouch, 2007. "Inventory control and periodic price discounting campaigns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 94-108, February.
    20. Li, Gang & Huang, Feng Feng & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zheng, Quan & Ji, Ping, 2014. "Make-or-buy service capacity decision in a supply chain providing after-sales service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 377-388.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:257:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-015-1838-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.