IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v215y2014i1p269-28310.1007-s10479-013-1468-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biproportional scaling of matrices and the iterative proportional fitting procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Pukelsheim

Abstract

A short proof is given of the necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of the Iterative Proportional Fitting procedure. The input consists of a nonnegative matrix and of positive target marginals for row sums and for column sums. The output is a sequence of scaled matrices to approximate the biproportional fit, that is, the scaling of the input matrix by means of row and column divisors in order to fit row and column sums to target marginals. Generally it is shown that certain structural properties of a biproportional scaling do not depend on the particular sequence used to approximate it. Specifically, the sequence that emerges from the Iterative Proportional Fitting procedure is analyzed by means of the L 1 -error that measures how current row and column sums compare to their target marginals. As a new result a formula for the limiting L 1 -error is obtained. The formula is in terms of partial sums of the target marginals, and easily yields the other well-known convergence characterizations. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Pukelsheim, 2014. "Biproportional scaling of matrices and the iterative proportional fitting procedure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 269-283, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:215:y:2014:i:1:p:269-283:10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabrielle Demange & Michel L. Balinski, 1989. "An Axiomatic Approach to Proportionality between Matrices," Post-Print halshs-00670952, HAL.
    2. M. L. Balinski & G. Demange, 1989. "An Axiomatic Approach to Proportionality Between Matrices," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 700-719, November.
    3. Sebastian Maier & Petur Zachariassen & Martin Zachariasen, 2010. "Divisor-Based Biproportional Apportionment in Electoral Systems: A Real-Life Benchmark Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 373-387, February.
    4. S M Macgill, 1977. "Theoretical Properties of Biproportional Matrix Adjustments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(6), pages 687-701, June.
    5. N. Gaffke & F. Pukelsheim, 2008. "Vector and matrix apportionment problems and separable convex integer optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(1), pages 133-159, February.
    6. Rüschendorf, L. & Thomsen, W., 1993. "Note on the Schrödinger equation and I-projections," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 369-375, August.
    7. Christoph Gietl & Fabian Reffel, 2013. "Accumulation points of the iterative proportional fitting procedure," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(6), pages 783-798, August.
    8. Aline Pennisi, 2006. "The Italian Bug: A Flawed Procedure for Bi-Proportional Seat Allocation," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Bruno Simeone & Friedrich Pukelsheim (ed.), Mathematics and Democracy, pages 151-165, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaonan Qu & Alfred Galichon & Johan Ugander, 2023. "On Sinkhorn's Algorithm and Choice Modeling," Papers 2310.00260, arXiv.org.
    2. Hong Chen & Tan Wang & David D. Yao, 2021. "Financial Network and Systemic Risk—A Dynamic Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2441-2466, August.
    3. Paul Glasserman & Linan Yang, 2015. "Bounding Wrong-Way Risk in Measuring Counterparty Risk," Working Papers 15-16, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    4. Kerem Akartunalı & Philip A. Knight, 2017. "Network models and biproportional rounding for fair seat allocations in the UK elections," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Johannes M. Schumacher, 2018. "A Multi-Objective Interpretation of Optimal Transport," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 94-119, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Serafini, 2015. "Certificates of optimality for minimum norm biproportional apportionments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Demange, Gabrielle, 2012. "On party-proportional representation under district distortions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 181-191.
    3. Oelbermann, Kai-Friederike, 2016. "Alternate Scaling algorithm for biproportional divisor methods," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 25-32.
    4. Gabrielle Demange, 2013. "On Allocating Seats To Parties And Districts: Apportionments," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-14.
    5. Victoriano Ramírez-González & Blanca Delgado-Márquez & Antonio Palomares & Adolfo López-Carmona, 2014. "Evaluation and possible improvements of the Swedish electoral system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 285-307, April.
    6. Gaffke, Norbert & Pukelsheim, Friedrich, 2008. "Divisor methods for proportional representation systems: An optimization approach to vector and matrix apportionment problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 166-184, September.
    7. Gabrielle Demange, 2021. "On the resolution of cross-liabilities," PSE Working Papers halshs-03151128, HAL.
    8. Michel Balinski, 2007. "Equitable representation and recruitment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 27-36, February.
    9. Demange, Gabrielle, 2017. "Mutual rankings," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 35-42.
    10. Kerem Akartunalı & Philip A. Knight, 2017. "Network models and biproportional rounding for fair seat allocations in the UK elections," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Marjorie B. Gassner, 1991. "Biproportional Delegations," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 321-342, July.
    12. Michel L. Balinski & Gabrielle Demange, 1989. "Algorithm for Proportional Matrices in Reals and Integers," Post-Print halshs-00585327, HAL.
    13. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "New electoral systems and old referendums," PSE Working Papers hal-01852206, HAL.
    14. MESNARD, Louis de, 1999. "Interpretation of the RAS method : absorption and fabrication effects are incorrect," LATEC - Document de travail - Economie (1991-2003) 9907, LATEC, Laboratoire d'Analyse et des Techniques EConomiques, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    15. Attila Tasnádi, 2008. "The extent of the population paradox in the Hungarian electoral system," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 293-305, March.
    16. Isabella Lari & Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari, 2014. "Bidimensional allocation of seats via zero-one matrices with given line sums," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 165-181, April.
    17. Moulin, Herve, 2017. "Consistent bilateral assignment," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 43-55.
    18. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "Mechanisms in a Digitalized World," CESifo Working Paper Series 6984, CESifo.
    19. Moulin, Hervé, 2016. "Entropy, desegregation, and proportional rationing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-20.
    20. Paolo Serafini & Bruno Simeone, 2012. "Certificates of optimality: the third way to biproportional apportionment," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 247-268, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:215:y:2014:i:1:p:269-283:10.1007/s10479-013-1468-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.