IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v211y2013i1p103-13610.1007-s10479-013-1427-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic bidding strategies in search-based advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Savas Dayanik
  • Mahmut Parlar

Abstract

Search-based advertising allows the advertisers to run special campaigns targeted to different groups of potential consumers at low costs. Google, Yahoo and Microsoft advertising programs allow the advertisers to bid for an ad position on the result page of a user’s query when the user searches for a keyword that the advertiser relates to its products or services. The expected revenue generated by the ad depends on the ad position, and the ad positions of the advertisers are concurrently determined after an instantaneous auction based on the bids of the advertisers. The advertisers are charged only when their ads are clicked by the users. To avoid excessive ad expenditures due to sudden surges in the keyword-search activities, each advertiser reserves a fixed finite daily budget, and the ads are not shown in the remainder of the day when the budget is depleted. Arrival times of keyword-search instances, ad positions, ad selections, and sales generated by the ads are random. Therefore, an advertiser faces a dynamic stochastic total net revenue optimization problem subject to a strict budget constraint. Here we formulate and solve this problem using dynamic programming. We show that there is always an optimal dynamic bidding policy. We describe an iterative numerical approximation algorithm that uniformly converges to the optimal solution at an exponential rate of the number of iterations. We illustrate the algorithm on numerical examples. Because dynamic programing calculations of the optimal bidding policies are computationally demanding, we also propose both static and dynamic alternative bidding policies. We numerically compare the performances of optimal and alternative bidding policies by systematically changing each input parameter. The relative percentage total net revenue losses of the alternative bidding policies increases with the budget loading, but were never more than 3.5 % of maximum expected total net revenue. The best alternative to the optimal bidding policy turned out to be a static greedy bidding policy. Finally, statistical estimation of the model parameters is visited. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Savas Dayanik & Mahmut Parlar, 2013. "Dynamic bidding strategies in search-based advertising," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 103-136, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:211:y:2013:i:1:p:103-136:10.1007/s10479-013-1427-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1427-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1427-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1427-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernd Skiera & Nadia Abou Nabout, 2013. "Practice Prize Paper ---PROSAD: A Bidding Decision Support System for Profit Optimizing Search Engine Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 213-220, March.
    2. G. E. Fruchter & W. Dou, 2005. "Optimal Budget Allocation over Time for Keyword Ads in Web Portals," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 157-174, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantin Kogan & Avi Herbon & Beatrice Venturi, 2020. "Direct marketing of an event under hazards of customer saturation and forgetting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 207-227, December.
    2. Savas Dayanik & Semih O. Sezer, 2023. "Optimal dynamic multi-keyword bidding policy of an advertiser in search-based advertising," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(1), pages 25-56, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bayer, Emanuel & Srinivasan, Shuba & Riedl, Edward J. & Skiera, Bernd, 2020. "The impact of online display advertising and paid search advertising relative to offline advertising on firm performance and firm value," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 789-804.
    2. Francisco-Javier Arroyo-Cañada & Jaime Gil-Lafuente, 2019. "A fuzzy asymmetric TOPSIS model for optimizing investment in online advertising campaigns," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 701-716, September.
    3. Klapdor, Sebastian & Anderl, Eva M. & von Wangenheim, Florian & Schumann, Jan H., 2014. "Finding the Right Words: The Influence of Keyword Characteristics on Performance of Paid Search Campaigns," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 285-301.
    4. Duncan Simester & Artem Timoshenko & Spyros I. Zoumpoulis, 2020. "Efficiently Evaluating Targeting Policies: Improving on Champion vs. Challenger Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3412-3424, August.
    5. Abou Nabout, Nadia & Lilienthal, Markus & Skiera, Bernd, 2014. "Empirical Generalizations in Search Engine Advertising," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 206-216.
    6. Simone Guercini, 2022. "Scope of heuristics and digitalization: the case of marketing automation," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 21(2), pages 151-164, November.
    7. D Laffey & C Hunka & J A Sharp & Z Zeng, 2009. "Estimating advertisers' values for paid search clickthroughs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(3), pages 411-418, March.
    8. Susan Cholette & Özgür Özlük & Mahmut Parlar, 2012. "Optimal Keyword Bids in Search-Based Advertising with Stochastic Advertisement Positions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 225-244, January.
    9. Yang, Chaolin & Xiong, Yi, 2020. "Nonparametric advertising budget allocation with inventory constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 631-641.
    10. Carsten D. Schultz, 2020. "The impact of ad positioning in search engine advertising: a multifaceted decision problem," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 945-968, December.
    11. Anoek Castelein & Dennis Fok & Richard Paap, 2019. "Dynamics in clickthrough and conversion probabilities of paid search advertisements," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-056/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. de Haan, Evert & Wiesel, Thorsten & Pauwels, Koen, 2016. "The effectiveness of different forms of online advertising for purchase conversion in a multiple-channel attribution framework," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 491-507.
    13. Yanwu Yang & Daniel Zeng & Yinghui Yang & Jie Zhang, 2015. "Optimal Budget Allocation Across Search Advertising Markets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 285-300, May.
    14. Lukas Jurgensmeier & Bernd Skiera, 2023. "Measuring Self-Preferencing on Digital Platforms," Papers 2303.14947, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    15. Savas Dayanik & Semih O. Sezer, 2023. "Optimal dynamic multi-keyword bidding policy of an advertiser in search-based advertising," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(1), pages 25-56, February.
    16. Kannan, P.K. & Li, Hongshuang “Alice”, 2017. "Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-45.
    17. Yanwu Yang & Baozhu Feng & Joni Salminen & Bernard J. Jansen, 2022. "Optimal advertising for a generalized Vidale–Wolfe response model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1275-1305, December.
    18. Nagpal, Mayank & Petersen, J. Andrew, 2021. "Keyword Selection Strategies in Search Engine Optimization: How Relevant is Relevance?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 746-763.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:211:y:2013:i:1:p:103-136:10.1007/s10479-013-1427-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.